Factcheck.org: Obama's Mailings

In a 2002 speech to the Democratic Leadership Council, Senator Clinton said:

"We all know the record of the DLC, the Progressive Policy Institute and, of course, the Clinton-Gore Administration. The economic recovery plan stands first and foremost as a testament to both good ideas and political courage. National service. The Brady Bill. Family Leave. NAFTA. Investment in science and technology. New markets. Charter schools. The Earned Income Tax Credit. The welfare to work partnership. The COPS program. The SAFER program. All of these came out of some very fundamental ideas about what would work.

"The results speak for themselves. Those ideas were converted into policies programs that literally changed millions of lives and, I argue, changed America."

This sounds like an affirmation of NAFTA to me.

http://www.ndol.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=106&subid=122&contentid=250750

The Obama campaign should send a mailer about NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND, which is a disaster in TX. She voted for it and said she knew it would never work.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/01/bill-clinton-fix-bush-ed_n_84516.html

I guess no one is intelligent enough to understand the fact it isn't just the fact that obama LIES it is the fact his mailer for healthcare is the exact same advertisement used in the 90s that defeated Universal Healthcare.

http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein_archive?month=02&year=2008&base_name=health_care_debate_mandates_as

I use to have faith that the American populace could sift through BS over the last 8 years I was definately wrong there is a large population that shows Americans are STUPID!

GO HILLARY, KICK OBAMA'S FAKE BUTT!!

FREE TRADE DOES NOT MEAN NAFTA. THE LAST A IN NAFTA MEANS AGREEMENT. IT IS THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENTS THAT ARE NOT FAIR. HE SAID I SUPPORT FREE TRADE THAT IS FAIR TO THE AMERICAN WORKERS. WE SHOULD HAVE FREE TRADE, WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS REVISIT THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT. THAT IS WHAT BOTH CLINTON AND OBAMA WANT. THE ONLY THING HERE IS THAT SHE IS SAYING SHE NEVER SUPPORTED IT. NOBODY IS PERFECT, OBAMA, SHOULD HE BE PRESIDENT WILL HAVE FAILURES. ITS ABOUT TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR FAILURES WHICH SHE DOES NOT WANT TO DO WITH HER IRAQ VOTE AND DOES NOT WANT TO DO WITH NAFTA

THERE ARE MANY COMPETENT WOMEN WHO CAN AND SHOULD RUN FOR PRESIDENT IN THE FUTURE. WOMAN WHO ARE WHERE THEY ARE ON THEIR OWN MERIT. NOBODY KNOWS WHO THEIR HUSBANDS ARE: CLAIRE McCaskill, Sebelius, NAPOLITANO, PELOSI,FEINSTEIN, ...WHY DO WE HAVE TO GO WITH THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL OF ALL. THE ONE WHO HAS BEEN RIDING ON HER HUSBAND BACK HER ENTIRE LIFE. THIS SHOW TO OUR YOUNG GIRLS THAT THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN GET IT DONE IS TO PLAY SECOND ROLE TO A MAN FOR 35 YEARS, FIRST. THAT IS THE KIND OF EXPERIENCE SHE BRINGS TO THE TABLE! NO THANK YOU!

ONE OF THE STRONGEST STRATEGIES HILLARy CAN IMpLEMET IS ATTACKING THE UNITy factor which is the driving force behind the OBAMA WAVE. WHAT HAppENS IF THERE IS A REpUBLICAN BACK LASH AFTER A NASTy presdential BATTLE. THEN WHAT? WHO WOULD BE THE most effective pRESIDENT in that scenario.

CAN MINORITIES AFFORD TO TAKE THE OBAMA RISK. WE KNOW UNDER THE CLINTON'S MINORITIES WILL pROSpER as they did in the ninety 's. THOSE WERE THE BEST OF TIMES FOR ALL AMERICANS.

LATINO'S ARE Loyal VOTERS. THEy WILL SAVE HILLARy . THERE IS GOING TO BE AN uproar because of the power and influence of the LATINO VOTE. THERE IS NO DOUBT HILLARy WILL WIN TEXAS AND OHIO.

WHEN I THINK OF HILLARy I THINK OF My MOTHER. ROCK SOLID on my side no matter what. SOMEONE WHO KNOWS WHAT IS "GOING ON" AND ALWAyS HAS My BEST INTEREST AT HEART. I IDOLIZE MICHAEL JORDON. HOWEVER I WOULD VOTE FOR My MOM OVER MICHAELJORDON. WHy I KNOW HER. MOST AMERICANS WOULD CHOOSE THEIR MOM OVER JORDON FOR president.

"IN HILLARY WE TRUST" eddiewhere 2008

LATINO'S ARE Loyal VOTERS. THEy WILL SAVE HILLARy . THERE IS GOING TO BE AN uproar because of the power and influence of the LATINO VOTE. THERE IS NO DOUBT HILLARy WILL WIN TEXAS AND OHIO.

WHEN I THINK OF HILLARy I THINK OF My MOTHER. ROCK SOLID on my side no matter what. SOMEONE WHO KNOWS WHAT IS "GOING ON" AND ALWAyS HAS My BEST INTEREST AT HEART. I IDOLIZE MICHAEL JORDON. HOWEVER I WOULD VOTE FOR My MOM OVER MICHAEL JORDON. WHy I KNOW HER. MOST AMERICANS WOULD CHOOSE THEIR MOM OVER JORDON FOR president

WHAT HAS OBAMA DONE IN THE LAST SIX MONTHS to CREATE THIS WAVE.
SIX MONTHS AGO HILLARy WAS IN CHARGE..

SA y LESS DO MORE. GO DOOR TO DOOR. IT IS VERy EFFECTIVE.



HOW HILLARY CAN WIN AND DEFEAT THE GREAT UNITER. IT IS EASY.

"HILLARY, defeating BARAK OBAMA SHOULD HAVE BEEN EASY. UNFORTUNATELY YOU WERE TAKING TOO MUCH ADVISE FROM THOSE IGNORANT RACIST CONSULTANTS OF YOURS.

THE FIRST THING YOU MUST DO IS TRUST YOUR GUT AND DO NOT LISTEN TO ANYONE for the Present MOMENT. TAKE YOUR OWN ADVISE. SOMETIMES A PRESIDENT MUST CEASE THE MOMENT AND TRUST THEMSELVES. YOUR TIME IS NOW.

COMMUNICATION- You HAVE TO MAKE THE AMERICAN voter feel your message.

WHAT MAKES YOU FEEL YOUR OWN MESSAGE. CAN You MAKE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FEEL THAT SAME PASSION FOR YOUR MESSAGE.

YOU HAVE TO RIDE THE OBAMA WAVE AND MAKE IT YOUR OWN. DO NOT FIGHT IT EMBRACE IT AND THEN ENGLULF IT.

CONNECTION WITH THE VOTERS is what You are LACKING. GET PEOPLE EXCITED ABOUT THE CLINTON MESSAGE. WE HAD THE BEST OF TIMES IN THE NINETYS.

TECHNICALLY ATTACK OBAMA ON THE ISSUES. RALPH NADER KNOWS HOW TO ATTACK OBAMA ON THE ISSUES. HE DOES IT SO EFFECTIVELY AND ACCURATELY WITHOUT GETTING MAD AND ENGAGING IN PERSONAL ATTACKS. HE SMOKED OBAMA.

IF YOU could ADOPT the NADER attack Platform on OBAMA and effectively use it in the next DEBATE YOU will have no PROBLEMS winning OHIO and TEXAS.

AMERICA HAS NOT CHANGED MUCH IN OHIO AND TEXAS. VOTERS WILL VOTE FOR YOU IF THEY CAN FEEL YOUR MESSAGE. THAT MESSAGE SHOULD NOT BE CAMAFLOUGED WITH ANGER BUT RATHER THE CALMNESS OF A ROCK HARD LEADER.

HILLARY you MANAGED TO DO THIS AT THE END OF THE LAST DEBATE.

DO NOT FALL INTO THE TRAPS THE OBAMA CAMP HAS SO SKILLFULLY SET FOR YOU. THEY LAUGH EVERy TIME YOU FALL IN. You should have saved the pamphlet and calmly surprised him at the DEBATE ON TUESDAY. THAT WOULD HAVE CHANGED EVERYTHING.

I JUST GAVE You the BLUEPRINT to EASY VictoY. RELAX HILLARY theY want You to Panic and FALL APART. You have to embrace the criticism and smile. GETTING MAD in Public is alwaYs a mistake. VENT Your anger out on BILL. YOUR CONSULTANS MAKE THINGS COMPLlCATED. MAKE YOUR MESSAGE CLEAR. REMEMBER HOW FAR YOU HAVE COME AND LOOK WHERE You are GOING HILLARY. YOU WON NEW YORK, and CALIFORNIA. THERE'S no waY You can lose if You follow this BLUEPRINT.

THE TIME IS NOW

YOUR TIME TO PROVE YOU ARE PRESIDENT HAS COME. TRUST Your GUT AND NEVER show anger" EDDIEWHERE 2008.

OUR TIME IS NOW

© 2008 EDDIEWHERE

Well this is typical politics. Same o same o. Of course Obama lied why shouldn't he? This is politics. Our country, yes this is our country, is becoming more and more divided everyday this campaign goes on.
Lets throw in religion. Tell me if any of Obama's speeches ever end with "God bless America"? I'm not sure if I heard him or not. Maybe that would stop the religious inuendos if he is indeed christian as we know christianity to be. Otherwise havng been a follower of Louis Farakhan, (please forgive me if I spelled his name wrong) who believes in the destruction of the United States, if this is true, isn't that like sending the cows to slaughter?
I know you should never mix religion and politics yet every other candidate has always made referrence to the loyalties of the United States as one nation under God.
I guess like marketingtruth has been trying to tell us, think and look at the facts. Read this read that and when we do it gets scarier and scarier. Where are we heading?

Let me give my two cents worth. True indeed these flyers have been circulating for a while but in the same token, Hillary and her camp contested the fliers when they first came out. They stated then that the fliers were misleading. The media very casually reported that she stated weeks ago that the fliers are not factual. After about 2 days of casually mentioning it, the story was buried.

Now that their is an election in Ohio and alot of factory workers were affected by Nafta, Obama, who has gotten away with absolutely everything thus far, found it necessary to redistrubute the fliers in Ohio. As everyone knows Texas and Ohio are must win states for Hillary and these fliers are misleading---of course she is angry and she is angrily speaking out this time. I find it very interesting that she had to angrily contest the fliers in order for the Media to get serious about this complaint.

I find it even more interesting that now some of the media and Obama have the audacity to say her outrage is tactical!! Give me a break, his actions are tactical and it says alot about him! Didn't he say he was going to bring about new politics and a new Washington. He was going to avoid the pettiness, bickering, underhandedness etc.... Isn't that what his campaign is about and isn't this what his true supporters (not people who are apart of the Anti HIllary Movement) most admire about him? Well guess what---all this man is showing is that he is the SAME as the the rest of the politicians. The more Obama talks the more he puts his foot in his mouth and the Media will make that evidently clear if he get the nomination. .

I'm "outraged" that Hillary is slamming Obama for the same crap she pulls ALL the time. The timing is also interesting. These fliers have been out for some time now, and all of a sudden she's mad - after many said she did little to shake up the race at Thursday's debate. Hmmm...

Obama gave many factual quotations from Clinton today (Sunday). The truth is all mailers and TV ads exaggerate and are one-sided. They are promoting one person's position. And that is true for all "products" not just Obama/Clinton. Obama's "sins" are small potatoes compared to the history of such communications.

I just had an interesting conversation with a friend of mine. We both have our opinions. He wants Obama because he is tired of the Bush/Clinton/Bush era and Hillary's position on the NAFTA vote and the Iraq war. Well she may have voted to fund the support of the troops but Obama supported the extension of NAFTA allowing the process of hispanic laborers being allowed overtime when our country is dealing with layoffs. Also I think why the democrats is continually being elluded the White House is because they are thinking short term, not long term. An Obama/Clinton tincket will doom the democrats. I know that. A Clinton/Obama ticket will bring hope of the future. This is the difference between a 4 to 8 year run or a 8 to 16 year run. Especially with Ralph Nader running again. Obama has attract voters 2 to 1 only because no one wants a Clinton. Throw Nader into the mix, the playing field is leveled. Democrats may be left out in the cold again. Another food for thought.