Gold-Plated Boredom
The ceremony was a little bit shorter this year. It just felt longer.
The Oscars almost didn't happen this year, because of the writers' strike—and the strike still managed to cast a shadow over the show. The 80th annual Oscars was one of the most uneven (and uneventful) telecasts in recent memory. Actually, it felt as if it had been slapped together in just a few days, and it probably was. At one point host Jon Stewart suggested, half jokingly and half apologetically, that the night was full of so many montages because they didn't have time to prepare anything else. The old footage almost outweighed the new: there was a clip reel of every single Best Picture winner, recent Best Directors, Actors, Actresses. There was even a taped segment about how Oscar nominees were selected that played like a lesson from "Schoolhouse Rock" without the music.
Though there were several songs at the Oscars—three of them were from the movie "Enchanted," and the Academy unwisely dragged out each performance separately instead of grouping them together—the night was still a rather tuneless affair. "No Country for Old Men" picked up four wins, including Best Picture, Director (for Joel and Ethan Coen), Adapted Screenplay and Supporting Actor (Spanish actor Javier Bardem). Curiously enough, all the other acting winners were foreign too. Daniel Day-Lewis (British) won Best Actor for "There Will Be Blood." Marion Cotillard (from France) took home Best Actress for "La Vie en Rose." And Tilda Swinton (born in London to Australian-Scottish parents) was the semisurprise Best Supporting Actress winner for "Michael Clayton," beating the sentimental favorite (and American) Ruby Dee, from "American Gangster."
But the Oscars are never just about winners or losers. They are about stars, and this year's ceremony was sorely lacking in that department. The biggest presenters of the night—Nicole Kidman, Renée Zellweger, Harrison Ford and Jack Nicholson—seemed to outshine the nominees, many of whom weren't even household names until this year (except George Clooney). The speeches also seemed oddly subdued—and cut short. Is it because foreigners aren't as self-congratulatory as Americans? It didn't help that we saw old clips of Halle Berry, Julia Roberts, Jamie Foxx, Adrien Brody, etc., all accepting their Oscars, reminding us of the shortage of defining O moments in this year's show.
Stewart, who received lukewarm reviews for hosting the Oscars in 2006, didn't seem to up his game. Or even try. He opened the show with a tame sequence of jokes, which gently mocked a few politicians (McCain, Hillary) instead of anyone in the audience. (His best joke of the night: he described the movie "Away From Her" as a drama about a woman with Alzheimer's who forgets her husband. "Hillary Clinton called it the feel-good movie of the year," Stewart said.) But most of his punchlines seemed small—like a countdown of all the pregnant actresses in attendance (the winner: Angelina Jolie, who—ha!—wasn't even there)—and forgettable, more appropriate for "Saturday Night Live" than Hollywood's biggest gala of the year. And he didn't seem to loosen up until the show was three-quarters over, when he invited the winner for Best Song, Marketa Irglova from "Once," back onstage to give her speech after the orchestra prematurely cut her off. When she left, he related a backstage conversation he had overheard about two Oscar statues kissing. Yeah, it was cute. But if the Academy doesn't find new ways to revive the Oscars, it might not feel any love again for a long time.
© 2008


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: bethybumble @ 03/14/2008 10:33:11 AM
Comment: Movies and today's group of actors and actresses are so bad that most people don't bother with movies as much as they used to do. Most of them are only in Hollyweird because they are the children of famous people - they don't have any real talent. Broadway theatre takes acting because you only get once chance to get it right. In a movie they can stop and do 57 takes until they get it right. Not to mention all the acting and speech coaches helping them talk, people holding up cards to feed them their lines, hair stylists, make-up artists, people feeding them catered food and professional wardrobe and photographers making them look their absolute best. With all that support, ANYONE could act !! Movies today don't take much acting or intelligence which is evident when they give their acceptance speeches. Some of these people can't talk coherently without a script and embarass themselves when they try. No thanks, I'd rather watch the History channel.
Posted By: Beasely @ 03/02/2008 8:20:09 PM
Comment: Congrats to the posting by eddiewhere on 2/29/2008. If there were an awards show for online comments, then you would have won quite a few including: 1. Longest diatribe that has nothing to do with the subject; 2. Most difficulty in determining when to capitalize words; and 3. Biggest load of horseshit spewed on the web.
We look forward to your acceptance speach which will have nothing to do with this comment...
Posted By: yhninc @ 02/29/2008 9:42:02 AM
Comment: The truth is that very few people in this era of serious economic and social issues have the time or interest in who wins prizes for movie-making. They need to get the show boiled down to the awards we care to watch which could fit neatly into a half hour...