Posted By: qtshad @ 09/23/2008 12:14:36 PM
Comment: Because the article was pro-vaccine, here are some arguments against it:
(1) unproven long-term safety record,
(2) expensive,
(3) incidence of cancer from HPV is low, even if the vaccine is effective,
(4) incentive of Merck to whitewash any problems,
(5) incentive of "sex without consequences" crowd to jump at anything that validates their world view,
(6) bundling it for 6-year-olds to increase adoption smacks of manipulation and lack of transparency.


Loading Menu