Why Are HPV Vaccine Rates So Low?
It's been hailed as one of the most effective ways to prevent cervical cancer, but millions of young women have yet to get immunized.
For Kari Lange, getting the human papillomavirus vaccine for her daughters, Erika, 16, and Darcy, 13, was a no-brainer. After all, the new vaccine is considered one of the most effective methods for preventing cervical cancer and genital warts. And the Lincolnshire, Ill., mom knew firsthand that even if the virus, which is transmitted through sexual contact, never progresses to cervical cancer, it is no picnic. She and her sister both contracted it when they were younger. "To me it wasn't even about sex," says Lange about having her daughters vaccinated. "It was just healthy for the kids."
The Food and Drug Administration approved Merck's human papillomavirus (or HPV) vaccine, Gardasil, in June 2006 for girls and women between the ages of 9 and 26. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists all recommend it. But despite their efforts—and a national ad campaign by Merck urging viewers to be "one less" person with cervical cancer—only two out of every 10 women in the approved age group have gotten the vaccine so far.
Why isn't everyone rushing to get immunized? In interviews with NEWSWEEK, health-care providers cited a variety of issues that may explain the low numbers: the high cost and inconvenience of the required three shots, a lack of awareness about HPV, the low number of regular physician visits among that age group, and parents' unease over immunizing their kids against a disease contracted through sexual activity. If the United States wants to lower the number of women who get cervical cancer each year, health officials say they must overcome those barriers. But it won't be easy.
Part of the problem is that—despite Merck's multimillion-dollar ad campaign—many patients, and parents, are still not aware of the link between the virus and the cancer. More than one-quarter of American women between the ages of 14 and 59 are estimated to have HPV, according to a study published last year in the Journal of the American Medical Association. But one 2007 study found that only 40 percent of women in the United States had even heard of the virus. And only half of them knew that HPV is the primary cause of cervical cancer. A new survey from the National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health found that more than 60 percent of women are unaware of any health problems associated with HPV. (In addition to abnormal cell growth, the virus can cause genital warts.)
The HPV vaccine doesn't guarantee that a woman won't get cervical cancer or warts, but it protects against viral types 16 and 18, which cause 70 percent of cervical cancer worldwide, and against types 6 and 11, which cause 90 percent of warts in both men and women. It's still unknown when, or if, immunity will wane and whether women will need to get booster shots later in life. But levels of the antibody to HPV appear to stay high for at least five years. Even if another dose is needed, health officials feel confident that another dose of the HPV vaccine is safe. It's not "biologically possible" to get HPV from the vaccine, which contains no live or killed virus and no viruslike particles, says the University of Michigan's Dr. Amanda Dempsey. The most common side effect has been pain at the injection site, says John Iskander, acting director of the CDC's immunization safety office.
But the vaccine is expensive: it typically costs $360 for three shots taken over six months. "There is a little bit of a sticker shock when they learn the cost," says Dr. James C. Turner, executive director of the department of student health at the University of Virginia and chair of the American College Health Association's vaccine-preventable disease committee. More than 98 percent of privately insured Americans get at least some coverage for the HPV vaccine. But more than 46 million Americans are uninsured, including 27 percent of women ages 19 to 26 (who aren't covered by the CDC's Vaccines for Children program, since they're not under 18).
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: qtshad @ 09/23/2008 12:14:36 PM
Comment: Because the article was pro-vaccine, here are some arguments against it:
(1) unproven long-term safety record,
(2) expensive,
(3) incidence of cancer from HPV is low, even if the vaccine is effective,
(4) incentive of Merck to whitewash any problems,
(5) incentive of "sex without consequences" crowd to jump at anything that validates their world view,
(6) bundling it for 6-year-olds to increase adoption smacks of manipulation and lack of transparency.
Posted By: qtshad @ 09/23/2008 12:01:09 PM
Comment: There are a lot of bad things you can avoid easily--if you dont mind the trade-offs. You're much more likely to die in an auto accident than to get cancer from HPV. Oh--you're still driving? For shame.
Posted By: arby665 @ 08/21/2008 10:51:03 PM
Comment: Maybe you should go and read a book. Get some kind of education behind you before you talk about something that you know nothing about,