The Hundred-Years War

McCain is running on 'success' in Iraq, but as the Pentagon warns, and a new study makes clear, it's not nearly that simple.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Double-L @ 10/17/2008 12:25:24 AM

    I wasn't going to add anything until I read Jim Johnson's screamingly funny remark about how 'coercion and fraud are anathema to the free-market system." Lord, has he ever read a history book, ANY history book? Coercion and fraud are almost PRIME-MOVERS in a free-market system. And the winners are " those who are honest, industrious, thoughtful, prudent, frugal, responsible, disciplined and efficient?" Really? So everyone who lost their life savings in the Enron collapse, or the current mess is 'shiftless, lazy, etc.,etc." By the way, Jimbo, I'm successful...and I'm voting for Obama.

  • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/16/2008 7:32:50 PM

    Dickey,

    You are showing your ignorance and your support for Obama! McCain said nothing about a hundred years war. You are a total jerk!

  • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/16/2008 7:31:20 PM

    Obama's view of the future of America - Socialism which is the next step to Communism!!


    Under socialism a ruling class of intellectuals, bureaucrats and social planners decide what people want or what is good for society and then use the coercive power of the State to regulate, tax, and redistribute the wealth of those who work for a living. In other words, socialism is a form of legalized theft.

    The morality of socialism can be summed-up in two words: envy and self-sacrifice. Envy is the desire to not only possess another's wealth but also the desire to see another's wealth lowered to the level of one's own. Socialism's teaching on self-sacrifice was nicely summarized by two of its greatest defenders, Hermann Goering and Bennito Mussolini. The highest principle of Nazism (National Socialism), said Goering, is: "Common good comes before private good." Fascism, said
    Mussolini, is "a life in which the individual, through the sacrifice of his own private interests??realizes that completely spiritual existence in which his value as a man lies."

    Socialism is the social system which institutionalizes envy and self-sacrifice: It is the social system which uses compulsion and the organized violence of the State to expropriate wealth from the producer class for its redistribution to the parasitical class.

    Despite the intellectuals' psychotic hatred of capitalism, it is the only moral and just social system.

    Capitalism is the only moral system because it requires human beings to deal with one another as traders--that is, as free moral agents trading and selling goods and services on the basis of mutual consent.

    Capitalism is the only just system because the sole criterion that determines the value of thing exchanged is the free, voluntary, universal judgement of the consumer. Coercion and fraud are anathema to the free-market system.

    It is both moral and just because the degree to which man rises or falls in society is determined by the degree to which he uses his mind. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one's birth or station in life.

    Yes, there are winners and losers in capitalism. The winners are those who are honest, industrious, thoughtful, prudent, frugal, responsible, disciplined, and efficient. The losers are those who are shiftless, lazy, imprudent, extravagant, negligent, impractical, and inefficient. [What about the role of luck­being in the right place at the right time or the wrong place at the wrong time? R. R. Pope}

    Capitalism is the only social system that rewards virtue and punishes vice. This applies to both the business executive and the carpenter, the lawyer and the factory worker.

  • Posted By: kirt @ 03/31/2008 2:01:30 PM

    This was the very problem in going into Iraq. By doing so you tip the power in the region and give rise to Iran. Now both Iran and Iraq are tied togehter. Good job Bush. Historian warn of this but flag waving drown them out. 9/11 and Saddam were not and should never been tied together not in the same sentence. We have taken our eyes off the ball in Afganistan. Peace dividen in invading Iraq is the same as WMDs. It was by playing to our nationalism that got us in Iraq we don't need it to keep us there. Who long would John Mccain keep us in Iraq when it was lies and mistakes that got us here in the first place. Do we keep lieing, keep making mistakes just to say we didn't lie and make mistakes.

    • Posted By: Dink23 @ 04/01/2008 8:55:55 AM

      Kirt, you are living in a dream world if you think 9/11, Saddam and terrorist are not connected. If they are terrorist in Miami, what makes you think they were not in Iraq? Do we as American's even care about a dicatator was killing his own people? Lie's! what lies? They found enough weapons in Iraq to kill over 1 million people. I don't know about you but I would call that massive. I think this whole argument has been about pary lines and who our President is. We should be American's first.

      • Posted By: Aussie123 @ 09/10/2008 10:15:59 PM

        Dink23, Saddam and Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 so stop spreading the lie. You know very well the US turned a blind eye to Saddam killing Kurds and Shiites decades ago and you also know that the US armed Saddam to fight Iran. You are only hurting Americans spreading these lies and sending innocent troops in harms way based on lies. I???m interested in your definition of ???being American first??? as I find your logic Anti-American.

  • Posted By: Aussie123 @ 09/10/2008 9:58:58 PM

    As per the posts below, your words are wasted on the American public who still believe the lies they were fed by the outgoing administration.

  • Posted By: The_epoch_point @ 05/13/2008 10:29:49 PM

    It's about time the left takes another look at Ronald Reagan and all the other strident anti-communists of the 20th century like Barry Goldwater and Joseph R. McCarthy. After all it was a Marxist Lee Harvey Oswald and a communist Sirhan Sirhan who knocked off the Kennedy Brothers. Now check out my book at Amazon.com

    The Epoch Point by Spencer Zimmerman is a religious historical conspiracy thriller that follows evil throughout the existence of mankind, revealing the constant conflict between God and the devil, good and evil. Robert Davis is a young Airman fresh out of Air Force basic training who, after being held captive in China, suddenly finds himself unraveling the most immense conspiracy in history. On duty during the 9/11 terrorist attacks, he soon uncovers hidden facts suggesting Russian and Iraqi involvement. While exploring abandoned military barracks at Kessler AFB in Mississippi, Davis and his friends discover the diary of Lee Harvey Oswald. Suddenly the Airmen find themselves the target of mysterious agents. As the clues surface, an evil emerges powerful enough to rewrite the entire history of humanity, not to mention kill two of his good friends. Before long the conspiracy takes on a supernatural form, marked by lightning, tornadoes, hurricanes, and volcanoes, the wrath of God. Davis finds himself torn by the unbelievable realization that God has a message for him. Nothing could prepare him for the final suspenseful twist the story takes, a Da Vinci style revelation that reaffirms his belief in Christ.

  • Posted By: markpt @ 04/01/2008 6:15:19 PM

    Is this joker trying to impress us with the whole 'Paris brasserie' and oysters crap???

  • Posted By: JohnHerrera305 @ 02/27/2008 5:45:45 PM

    Reply to xsoilder:

    You wrote "All I am saying is that we just can't ignore the problem and expect it to go away. We need to finish the job in Iraq and we need to insure our country can be safe." So you are saying by not finishing the job we will not be "safe". When in fact we are now less safe than before we invaded Iraq. Before we invaded Iraq, we had over 3,000 troops alive and well serving in our military. Our presence in Iraq will not affect our safety. This was the argument that was feed to the American people and which many people ate like yourself. There is no Security benefit to the United States of American to have permanent occupation in Iraq. Now, let's see, the Republicans stand to earn billions of dollars with contracts for development (oil) in Iraq. Maybe that's the reason why they don't want to pull out. We are heading into an energy crisis and the US wants to secure oil by occupying Iraq. What we should do is invest in Green energy. This war boils down to money. And it's the first war in our Country's history where we have engaged in War due to money/oil.

    • Posted By: yuri.zavorotny @ 02/27/2008 9:31:24 PM

      The reason for invading Iraq was to turn it into a prosperous democracy and into an example the rest of ME would follow. And that would be the end of al-Qaeda too. And it would work, if after the fall of Saddam Iraqis started cooperating with US instead of making a country-wide bloodbath. Does anyone think it was a logical and expected choice?
      And I don't think Iraqis want US to leave now. Eventually -- yes, but not now.

      • Posted By: Dink23 @ 04/01/2008 9:58:37 AM

        I don't understand the whole " we are now less safe than before " comments. The last time I checked we have not been attacked on our soil. The Dems are the ones who think we can bend over for them and they will go away. Not true. Their religion tells them to kill non-believers. They want to kill us. One day you are going to realize how important it is to fight back. But instead you think this is about Republicans making money. How can only Republicans make money from this? Tell me one example of Republicans making money but not Dems? It is just crazy talk from crazy people who hate Bush and hate Republicans and bing nice to crazy people will make them go away.

  • Posted By: dove @ 03/31/2008 1:42:37 PM

    to dink23 if most of europe doesn't want to be involved in iraq/iran which is their backyard, what makes it our problem? theyre not warring with neighboring democratic countires.

    • Posted By: Dink23 @ 04/01/2008 8:47:38 AM

      Dove, that's my point. we don't want them in our yard, so we are fighting them in thiers. We are the "World Leader" for democracy. It is our job and our duty to fight for those who can't fight for themselves. We should take pride in that instead of constantly blaming our President for every little thing that we can just because he is Republican.

  • Posted By: xsoldier @ 02/27/2008 1:20:40 PM

    Everyone is fooling themselves if they think the world will somehow become a safer place if we pull out of Iraq. The very thing that is repulsive to the liberals (hate, war mongering) is what a whole group of people called extremist muslims are all about. Its funny how no one will stand up and condemn the very group who is responsible for most of the Middle East's deaths. We can vote in a Dem--they can "negotiate" with the rougue nations and we will see what happens. Take away the ability of the government to keep an eye on suspected terrorists living in this country. See what happens. Doesn't anyone get the fact that there is a REASON we have not been attacked on a major scale since 9/11. Whats going to happen when we have to live in a society where you cannot live in a major city without fear for your life? Its going to happen--then again--the government will be blamed for not keeping the terrorists at bay. The fact is that we need a presence in the Middle East and elsewhere in the world to keep our country safe and not give our kids a country that fears on a daily basis. We are lucky we have people who are willing to do that. How many of you sit in your living rooms, enjoying our (so far) safe country and belly ache about the President and his policies? What have YOU done for your country lately. Wake up and smell the coffee....

    • Posted By: kirt @ 03/31/2008 2:43:31 PM

      My son dose not feel the same way as you.

  • Posted By: bobkat810 @ 03/19/2008 12:37:47 PM

    John McCain is as big a dope as the President. The only winners from the war in Iraq will be Iran. We took out there biggest enemy, Saddam. Now we have to stay to keep the peace! How long will this last? How long did Vietnam last? We have 4000 some dead brave Americans and countless untold injured from Iraq and 58,000 dead Americans form Vietnam. It will end when the people finally see that there is no light at the end of the tunnel..only more death, debt, uncertainity, pain, heartbreak, ....

  • Posted By: denise735 @ 03/31/2008 11:44:02 AM

    Many people seem to be confused or maybe it is Me? Didnt Pres.Bush stand on a big ship and tell us that the War is Over?! In previous Wars that the U.S. were in When the War was over (other than established bases) our troops came home. Makes me wonder how much is the Pres. and his buddies making (monetarily) by keeping our family member in this ridiculous civil conflict overseas. The threat of "We dont want to fight thes war on our shore" is a fear tactic that this government uses as an excuse not to secure our own borders as money invested and made by politician isnt in this country they have it invested out of our country These comments are not researched but is how How Ifeel our government led by Bush has realy gone WRONG I am not putting anouther Republican in our White House that promises more of the same !

  • Posted By: Dink23 @ 03/31/2008 8:45:50 AM

    So Dickey the bottom line for you is " Lets try to talk some sense into these people who have no respect for american lives whatsoever". With a Democratic President we will be fighting on our own soil instead of theirs. You people just don't seem to understand the kind of mindset that we are dealing with. It is about religion and you libs are trying to act like all we have to do is just be nice and they will go away. Their religion teaches them different. They want you to think that being nice to them changes things because that is when we are vulnerable. You need to wake up out of your dream and realize your enemy is called radical muslims. This country is only weak when we have leaders who are not willing to take a stand and fight back. Right now those leaders are called Democrats.

  • Posted By: abla2000 @ 03/08/2008 9:56:45 AM

    dickey u t just spewing out word....nothing but words.
    all yr predictions about iraq has been proved wrong.
    u twist facts and comment on assumptions.
    iraq is a war won aganst al qaida and oppression.
    bush is a great statesman and will be know as the greated leader the world has known for decades to come.

  • Posted By: nawawimohamad @ 03/04/2008 1:51:06 AM

    Success in Iraq and the war is over only when there are no more soldiers on the streets and no more green zones - just normal Baghdad like any other peaceful city in the world where you can walk freely.

  • Posted By: xsoldier @ 02/28/2008 4:09:07 PM

    lovo del norte, perhaps paranoid, but still better than putting my head in the sand. Are you willing to bet your life that we will remain safe? Your statement "now people in Iraq are worse than they were when they were under husseins rule"--are you sure? Have you been there? Have you seen any evidence other than what the media will have you believe? The media does a good job of presenting one side of the situation. Only the people who have had boots on the ground could tell you the real story here, not the liberal media. The best place to find out the real story is to read what some actual soldiers have posted--hear it from the horses mouth, not what you see on TV. We did have a plan when we went in there. There was obviously some things that happened that we did not count on. The real issue is how do we get out and let the Iraq people win.

  • Posted By: lovo del norte @ 02/28/2008 2:31:25 PM

    also, xsoldier, if we didn't have a plan why did we go there in the first place? now people in Iraq are worse than they were when they were under husseins rule. so if there is no game-plan, don't play! you may loose! and tell me what is happening to us now? have we won anything?

  • Posted By: lovo del norte @ 02/28/2008 2:25:39 PM

    xsoldier, you are paranoid!

  • Posted By: xsoldier @ 02/28/2008 11:43:02 AM

    apolemic, Too bad you will be the first one to blame everyone else when this country gets hit again. People who put thier heads in the sand and refuse to believe that there is a real threat to us and our country are a sad lot. Its usually those whos lives have not been touched at all from the previous attacks that have deluded themselves in believing that anyone who dares to say it could and will happen again are fear mongers. Imagine the suprise when the dirty bomb goes off in New York and kills millions of people. There are peopls as we speak who are trying to make this happen. Its not fear mongering--its a fact of 2008 and you bet we had better be scared. And we had better be taking steps. I am not prepared to just sit back, pretend these people are not out there and slam anyone who has real knowledge of the reality of the threat.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse