‘Shortages Are on the Horizon’

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

You are in Norway to inaugurate the so-called "doomsday seed vault." Tell us about it.
Basically, the vault is an assembly of all the gene banks in the works, sort of as a repository of last resort. Today was the opening. We put about 268,000 different strains of crops and plants inside, 70,000 of which were rice from our gene bank at the institute. We made 25 percent of the first deposits.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Aranck @ 03/03/2008 7:01:16 PM

    Zeigler states: "We have been growing [genetically modified crops] for well over a decade now in North America on vast acreages, and no harm has been done to anything or anybody." This declaration is premature, and that attitude is what makes GM inherently dangerous. Any good scientist knows that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Furthermore, large scale studies designed to detect subtle toxicological effects have not been carried out. There is a massive problem with honey bee Colony Collapse Disorder, and the cause remains undetermined. Convergence of crops and loss of biodiversity is a significant hazard. GM proponents guaranteed a lack of gene escape - a phenomenon which occurred readily and broadly upon implementation of GM crops. Socially responsible scientists should advocate a middle of the road approach - proceed with innovations, but be ACTIVELY vigilant to determine adverse effects.

  • Posted By: Aranck @ 03/03/2008 7:00:15 PM

    Zeigler states: "We have been growing [genetically modified crops] for well over a decade now in North America on vast acreages, and no harm has been done to anything or anybody." This declaration is premature, and that attitude is what makes GM inherently dangerous. Any good scientist knows that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Furthermore, large scale studies designed to detect subtle toxicological effects have not been carried out. There is a massive problem with honey bee Colony Collapse Disorder, and the cause remains undetermined. Convergence of crops and loss of biodiversity is a significant hazard. GM proponents guaranteed a lack of gene escape - a phenomenon which occurred readily and broadly upon implementation of GM crops. Socially responsible scientists should advocate a middle of the road approach - proceed with innovations, but be ACTIVELY vigilant to determine adverse effects.

  • Posted By: greenrev @ 03/03/2008 11:31:09 AM

    I don't think producing biofuels is negative at all. Specially if we can overgrow and plant over what is supposed to be for food. Also, there are some other crops that are useful for biofuels. The technology has to be implemented, and also supported.
    im sure when gas reaches 4,00 we will start wondering why we depend on foreign oil suppliers. We need to supporto biofuels, it is the future.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse