The End of the Spanish Empire
In an election year, Spain's economy is suddenly faltering. Its candidates have run out of steam, too.
The listing on Ebay España tells you all you need to know about the current Spanish election campaign: "I'm putting my vote up for bid … I will vote exactly as the top bidder asks." Humorous? Possibly. Cynical? Definitely. Voters don't go to the polls until Sunday, but many Spaniards have already made up their minds: they're not happy with the parties or the candidates. And they'll undoubtedly be ho-hum about the results, whatever they are.
The candidates have done their part, too, in turning this into the eBay Election: it seems anything and everything is for sale. When Socialist Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero pledged to create 2 million new jobs over the next four-year term, the Popular Party's Mariano Rajoy promised 2.2 million. When Zapatero said he would cut income taxes, Rajoy offered to cancel them (on annual incomes below €16,000). When the Socialist Party promised to plant 45 million trees—one for every Spaniard—the PP thought hard and promised 500 million. These electoral bribes are "bread to the masses," says Rafael Pampillón of Madrid's Business Institute. "But giving a drug addict methadone isn't a long-term solution."
The descent into Politics For Sale is a particularly shocking fall for Zapatero, who came from nowhere to become a popular and effective leader four years ago. As he battles to secure a second term, he now seems adrift except for his contempt for the political opposition. True, his success in 2004 was almost accidental: the then-incumbent Popular Party reacted so cynically to the Madrid train bombings three days before the election that the Socialists, led by Zapatero, were gifted their victory at the polls. Still, in the early years of his government, Zapatero was feted worldwide for his apparent competence and vision. But it gradually became clear that he lacked charisma and he slowly sank into a welter of petty domestic disputes, fell off the global radar and, more importantly, turned off the electorate with a series of botched policy decisions.
Zapatero's early success began to look as accidental as his election—not so much the product of political leadership as a dividend bequeathed to him by a strong economy. The latest polls have the Socialists and the PP neck and neck or give Zapatero & Co. a slim lead going into Sunday's election. But if he does win, the government he will form will be weaker than it is today. The combination of more partisan squabbling and less decisiveness does not bode well for any prime minister facing the sort of issues that loom on Spain's horizon. Political gridlock in Madrid will make it tougher to deal with perennial issues like managing immigration and keeping a lid on regional disputes.
But a bigger storm is brewing: Spain's economy is slowing, from an enviable 3.8 percent last year to a projected 2.4 percent this year. Unemployment took a slight upturn, to 8.6 percent, at the end of last year. More significantly, inflation is rising—to above 4 percent—and the spectacular housing bubble has burst. Half of the country's real-estate offices folded during 2007, according to an industry association—a stunning figure even if many of those offices consisted of just one person and a cell phone. None of this is out of line with the rest of the euro zone, but that's precisely the problem. Spain as of last year was way ahead of the pack. Spain has become an "average" country, says André Sapir, a Belgian economist and an adviser to Zapatero.
Mediocrity is hard to digest when you've tasted stardom, and the Spanish people are disheartened by the spectacle of their leaders descending into pettiness. Last week, Zapatero, 47, and Rajoy, 52, faced each other in the first televised debate in 15 years in Spain, yet they did so with no confidence. Fearing gaffes, their handlers choreographed the event with such paranoia it was bound to be unenlightening. The candidates talked past each other, and viewers as well, parroting sound bites from stump speeches and brandishing documents neither they nor the audience could read at a distance. They came across as bickering neighbors, not statesmen. The sad truth, says Paul Isbell of the Elcano Royal Institute in Madrid, is that Spain needs first-rate leaders and Zapatero and Rajoy don't make the grade.
The choice between two lackluster figures is quite a comedown for a nation that had appeared to be enjoying a run of unusually strong leadership. Trapped in sterile isolation for four long decades under Generalissimo Francisco Franco and freed only by his death in 1975, Spain didn't begin to experience an economic boom until the early 1990s, well into the long rule (1982-1996) of Felipe González. Open to trade and investment and new ideas in general, it became the California of Europe: a tourist mecca (second only to France) and an agricultural hothouse, a magnet for immigration and a strong player in telecommunications, with Latin America as its "Pacific Rim." Taking office after González, Prime Minister José María Aznar declared, repeatedly, that Spain would soon "punch above its weight" in the global ring, and for the first time since the fall of its empire, it did.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: capicua @ 03/24/2008 2:05:13 AM
Comment: Javier_G shows a saddening case of ad hominem attacks: his reply starts as an appeal to analogy, but ends with crude name-calling marred by ill-spelling and ill-use of words. This, of course, is useless as proof that the reporters' information is teeming with "lies, misconceptions, and unfounded stereotypes", as Javier_G alleges. In any case, it seems Javier_G was too busy hurling insults to note that Obama's historic speech on race, issued as part of the current election campaign, did hark back to the kind of history Javier_G seems bent on ignoring. To suggest that Franco is unimportant to understand today's Spain is an embarrassing example of a lack of a historical dimension. One must add that Javier_G's anecdotal exemption from mugging is no refutation for any significant claim, but, oh well, to answer his question: on my last trip to Spain, I was almost mugged (I barely wriggled away), and I saw someone get mugged, all in a matter of two days.
Posted By: javier_g @ 03/08/2008 2:37:54 PM
Comment: I am overwhelemed by the sheer amount of lies, misconceptions and unfounded sterotypes used as the basis for your article about present-day Spain. First of all, Spain is one of the greatest countries in the world, not measured its welfare and life quality rather than by its economic power (which only a few enjoy in presumably 'rich' countries sich as the USA, indeed there are more extremely poor people in the states than there are inhabitants in the whole of Spain) Otherwise it wouldn't be the second most visited country in the world, one of the few countries where ALL citizens have equal legal rights, etc. Refrences to Franco, Aznar and the Spanish Empire in your article are anachronical and obliterated. How would you like an article about the American elections that based its arguments on Robert Lee and the civil war? While Aznar is as contemporary to us as death penalty and Guantanamo is to you, General Franco is as old-fashioned as the Three fifths Compromise, Gettysburg and the Southern Literary Messenger.
To have somebody from a country that exports Britney Spears as a singer and whose president 's sperm stains on an internship's dress were an issue of public debate lecture upon democracy in our thriving democracy makes me laugh.
Posted By: javier_g @ 03/08/2008 2:18:52 PM
Comment: Claiming that Spain was safe under Franco's illigitimate dictatorship, validated only after a cruent civil war and supported by terror, death and prosecution is a claim that could only come from an illiterate poor man's mind. We do not want you in our free, open-minded, strongly secure country.
And now really, have you ever get mugged in Spain? Me not once in 28 years!!!