WORLD AFFAIRS

An Ancient Glory Rises

One of the great schools of antiquity—Buddhism's Nalanda University—is being rebuilt in India.

 
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Centuries before Oxford University even opened its doors, a school in northeast India attracted thousands of the brightest minds from China, Persia and Turkey. Deeply influenced by Buddhist teachings, it was known as Nalanda—the "giver of knowledge"—and its vast campus included temples, meditation halls, gardens and a library filled with rare manuscripts. In keeping with a Buddhist tradition of openness to new ideas, the students studied theology along with medicine, astronomy and the arts. And while Europe was mired in the Dark Ages, these young scholars were encouraged to take part in vigorous discussions and to advance the intellectual debates of the day.

Over the decades, Nalanda declined in prominence. In the 12th century it was destroyed by Turkish-Muslim marauders who all but pushed Buddhism out of India. But now, centuries later, political leaders from throughout Asia have joined forces with Nobel-laureate economist Amartya Sen, the Dalai Lama and other notables to rebuild this once great institution. Over the next five years, they plan to spend $1 billion to establish a new Nalanda on a 200-hectare site not far from the old university. They will hire 450 teachers, including four dozen from abroad, and plan initially to enroll 1,150 students from throughout the world. The school's backers are hoping research will begin as early as next year.

The attempt to rebuild a world-class university in this remote corner of India reflects in part an effort to restore Asia's reputation as an intellectual heavyweight. But it is also driven by a recognition that Buddhism is prospering in India. Seven years ago, there were just 8 million Buddhists there out of a population of 1 billion, making it the country's fifth largest religion. Today there are more than 35 million Indian Buddhists, and demographers say the number is growing quickly, particularly among the poor.

Like the old Nalanda, Sen says, this new university will have a Buddhist outlook: "It is worth recollecting that 'Buddha' means 'enlightened'," he says. But he says it will also mimic the old Nalanda by encouraging students to go beyond the study of religion and classics into more-contemporary pursuits, including the arts, sciences and business. Students of all religions will be invited to attend.

Yet challenges abound, including alleged corruption and inefficiency in Bihar, the state where Nalanda is located. Mismanagement of the nearby Mahabodhi Temple, where Buddha attained enlightenment 2,500 years ago, has turned a hallowed site into a haven for thugs and unscrupulous monks (see related story). Critics say this kind of government apathy is a bad sign for Nalanda's prospects, though no one will go on the record for fear of reprisal. Meantime, many important details of the school have yet to be worked out, including whether to charge tuition. (The old Nalanda was free.)

Still, the idea of re-establishing this once pre-eminent university has some powerful momentum behind it. The governments of China, India, Japan and Singapore have all pledged to contribute the initial funds. Foreign ministers from Singapore and Japan have backed the project, hosting meetings for a board of overseers who are fleshing out programs of study and developing a budget and organizational structure for the new institution. Chinese and Indian government ministers plan to hold similar meetings later this year, and former Indian president A.P.J. Abdul Kalam has agreed to oversee the operations of the school.

Adding some theological heft to the project is the Dalai Lama, himself an accomplished Buddhist teacher of what he's called the "Nalanda tradition of wisdom." He has agreed to donate rare Tibetan-language translations of key Buddhist texts that had been destroyed at Nalanda centuries ago—suggesting the new university will be not only the giver of knowledge but a restorer as well.

© 2008

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Hashi @ 03/23/2008 11:55:58 AM

    Ganpat's comment belies a bigger problem by following a well-orchastrated plan to blame everything on Muslim. Did not hear the same thing about the Babri Mosque in Ayodhya where Hindutvadi claim of Hindu fanatics of BJP, World Hindu Parshad and RSS has been that Mughal Emperor used materials from destroyed Ram Mandir. There is not an iota of truth in such claims.
    By the way, my comments to Sudip had nothing to do with educating a Hindu with their own history, as long as it is no one sided that xenophobia takes precedence over facts, and fiction over 'real' history, not myths.
    Enough said,
    Habib Siddiqui
    p.s: I was also surprised to Ganpat's posting giving the impression that "Habib Siddiqui" comments. That is another example of putting his words into my mouth. I am shocked!

  • Posted By: Ganpat @ 03/12/2008 12:30:49 PM

    Habib Siddiqui:

    Islam has an appalling history of destruction of Hindu temples. This can be seen even today in Delhi where famous Muslim monuments are built of material that visibly came from demolished temples.

    There is not one large Hindu temple left from pre-Islamic days in the part of India - the North - that was longest under Muslim rule, wheras many such temples have survived in the South and other areas that either escaped Muslim rule or fell under it much later than North India.

    Muslim chronicles themselves detail painstakingly and boastfully the endless destruction of Hindu monuments by Muslim rulers.

    Don't try to fool Hindus on their own history Siddiqui.

    It's like telling Jews there was no Holocaust.

  • Posted By: Hashi @ 03/11/2008 2:20:24 PM

    Sudip Majumdar is disingenuous in his claim that the decline of the Nalanda had much to do with Turkish-Muslim invasion in the 12th century. As David Scott "Buddhism and Islam: Past to Present Encounters and Interfaith Lessons" (1995) has correctly pointed out that centres of learning were already declining, before the presence of Muslims. When the Tibetan translator Chag Lotsawa visited the place in 1235, some 3 decades after Bakhtiyar Khilji's conquest of Bengal and Bihar, he found it still functioning with a small number of monks. Only the fortified Sena monasteries along the main route of the conquest were destroyed, and being off the main route both Nalanda and Bodh Gaya survived. Many institutions off the main route such as the Jagaddala Monastery in northern Bengal were untouched and flourishing. Not to be forgotten in this context is the historical fact that from the 7th to the 12th century, before the advent of Islam, there were frequent wars between Hindu and Buddhist dynasties during which time many such places of learning and worship were destroyed. Thus, while India gave birth to Buddha and Buddhism - the faith that bears his name - was almost completely wiped out by fanatic Hindu rulers, and, as has been noted by Dr. Jamin Das, had it not been for the Muslim conquest of vast territories of India, Buddhism probably would have been totally wiped off from the Indian soil.
    In recent years, with the ugly rise of Hindu nationalism/xenophobia, it is sad to see how facts are twisted to divide our world into enemy camps. Sudip Majumdar needs to study history thoroughly before throwing dirt on any community.
    Habib Siddiqui, Philadelphia, USA

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg
 
 
WORLD AFFAIRS

Throughout Asia, Buddhism is growing fast, playing an increasingly political—and, in some spots, militant—role.