SPONSORED BY:

The Fear Factor

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Russian opposition leaders, investigative journalists and human-rights activists now operate in an atmosphere of fear. The Kremlin has shut down NGOs considered too political, and called in the tax police to keep those still in operation on their toes. To force independent NGOs to the margins, the Kremlin now funds NGOs either invented by the government or fully loyal to it.

Elections also have become a farce. The playing field is uneven, and the most vocal opposition candidates, including former prime minister and presidential candidate Mikhail Kasyanov, are not even allowed to participate. Putin—not the voters—selected his successor, Dmitry Medvedev. Russia's presidential vote on March 2. will be the least competitive election in Russia's post-Soviet history. The tragedy of the Putin era is that none of these autocratic reforms were needed to sustain economic growth, political stability or the president's popularity. In fact, more democracy—that is, an independent court system, real opposition parties and a robust independent media—would have helped to fight corruption, protect property and spur more growth. Yes, the Putin era was good for most Russians. But it could have been even better.

McFaul is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, a professor of political science and the director of the Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law at Stanford University. 

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Ilia_Prahov @ 03/13/2008 7:52:48 AM

    http://fkriuk.blogspot.com/2007/12/brave-kremlinologist-too-bad-for-him.html <-- Yes, Citpecks is a PR agent working for Kremling. His link says it all really...

  • Posted By: Citpeks @ 03/04/2008 9:24:59 PM

    Your problem, Mr. McFaul, is that people in Russia know what your ???pieces??? are really worth. For example, in your ???FA piece???, you claim: ???At the end of the 1990s, annual alcohol consumption per adult was 10.7 liters; by 2004, this figure had increased to 14.5 liters??? ???. ANY Russian knows that ???consumption??? in 90-th does mean it ;) Stores and kiosks were full of counterfeit vodka, what these numbers are saying is that consumption of legal alcohol (as oppose to illegal) increased. And a person who is so ???prolific??? writer about Russia cannot be unaware of it. McFaul is indeed a Copperfield of Journalism! I invite readers to very interesting blog which I found several days ago:
    http://fkriuk.blogspot.com/2007/12/brave-kremlinologist-too-bad-for-him.html

    Such brainless pustozvons (like Ilia_Prahov who does not live in Russia) could be bought by McFaul???s propaganda. But overwhelming majority of Russians knows that we are doing the right thing. We have problems (lots of them), but we know them (and it is not what yours, and of various ???Lucases???, propaganda writes about) and we will handle them without your (and Asslund???s for that matter) ???help???.

  • Posted By: Citpeks @ 03/04/2008 8:29:21 PM

    Hey, pustozvon, you still keep trolling around? So, again, what about your
    "the vast majority of russians are simply struggling for survival just like they did 10 years ago"?
    Are you going to back up your nonsense with something? Anybody in Russia (except bums, may be)
    are rolling their eyes... Even McFaul did claim anything
    like that, not to look an absolute idiot. But you are not afraid to look as such... :))))
    Then, as I see, you could not read through the World Bank report which I gave you?
    Slyshkam mnoga bukfff? ;) I'll try to reformulate my citation, so that it could be accessible
    to your, clearly, challenged brain: The report concludes that practically all (89%) the GDP growth (that is growth of economics, stands for Growth Domestic Product) was due to PRODUCTIVITY growth in the time of Putin (not due to oil prices as some economically illiterates as you and McFaul claim). Now, pustozvon, what was the ???growth??? ;) in Russia in times when people like Asslund were major economic advisors of Yeltsin? And what part of that ???growth??? could be explained by productivity growth? ???))
    About ???brigadnik??? - you and alike need to visit psychiatrist. This is called paranoia???;)

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now