A Momentum Swing?

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

All these developments add up to a momentum shift, according to Clinton's hopeful advisers. "We've seen a tipping point," Penn said. In light of the polls, which show a dead heat in Texas, and Clinton's tendency to rebound just when her candidacy seems to be dead, Tuesday's election returns could be fraught with drama. The campaign will hold a rare election-night bash in Columbus, Ohio, before departing for Washington Tuesday night.

If Clinton doesn't score much needed wins Tuesday? While it's been previously suggested by her own campaign that Ohio and Texas are "must-win" states, Clinton's not acting like a candidate considering withdrawal. The campaign will likely spend Wednesday at her headquarters in Arlington, Va., where Clinton and her advisers will presumably pore over returns and make big decisions. It's easy to imagine that increasingly angst-filled Democratic Party officials could pay a visit to Clinton headquarters, too.

When asked on Tuesday about Gov. Bill Richardson's comments that whoever has the most delegates Wednesday morning should be the nominee, Clinton said, "This is a long process … My husband didn't get the nomination wrapped up until June. That has been the tradition, that it usually lasted longer, into the early summer. This is a very close race, and we're just taking it day by day. It's a long road to the nomination."

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Perplexedin CA @ 03/10/2008 10:58:11 AM

    In reply to Interested! In theory, I like your response. In fact I do feel the same way about our roads and air quality. I have in fact filed my taxes, and yes, I do agree that the infrastructure could and should be better managed to keep costs down. My point really was that everyone should be responsible for their own, and NO ONE should have to pay for others. If everyone was held accountable for their decisions, (ie: if you "decide" to have three kids and a Lincoln Navigator YOU are the one who is responsible for paying for them), then our collective tax burden to "power" the infrastructure you refer to would be less. As long as we allow people to sponge off the system we will never lessen the costs. Lest I be accused of being too conservative let me say that I do NOT condone cutting people off of welfare, and benefits if they are ACTUALLY qualified for it. No, just because you aren't working, and decided not to continue your education and have 4 kids does NOT qualify you. Again, we come back to accountability. Those things were decisions YOU made, so now you live with the consequences.

  • Posted By: Cliff n WA @ 03/05/2008 11:52:29 PM

    I want to take a break from the referendum on gender, race and white guilt, but it is like what they say about train wrecks; horrible yet irresistible to watch. In my wildest thoughts I did not think we would be analyzing (later in 2009) the role hate politics, reverse racism and white guilt had in electing a President.
    So now Barak???s middle name is off limits? What are Republicans going to do without the time honored strategy of saying an opponents??? name with derision? When they sneer the label ???liberal,??? and they will, is that going to be racist too? White Democrat guilt made experience and qualifications off limits for awhile. I think things will change come November, but not like Barak hopes.

  • Posted By: Cliff n WA @ 03/05/2008 4:10:55 PM

    Evil laughter nation wide as we here news of a Florida election.
    Even from me as I race to copy-past old material
    In all fairness the DNP should step up and admit signals were given before the nomination process even began that Florida and Michigan delegates would be seated no matter who won the state.. Especially Florida since it was republicans in control of moving their primary up and breaking the rules. The party can ill afford to have Florida feel alienated in the general election. Instead they let Clinton take the heat.
    No one thought then these delegates could determine the nomination and I do not think they will or should now. But to bash Sen. Clinton for trying to do what is best for the party while giving Obama a pass for trying to change the super delegate rules put in place long ago is the height of hypocrisy!
    Super delegates were put in place when the party decided to make the nomination so open to outside influences. To offset potential sabotage. They were created for exactly the situation we now face, when a movement threatens to co-opt the political party and/or voters are swayed toward someone who may not be best for the party or country.
    We are seeing the price to be paid for opening up the nomination to the general public. What is next; a general election for the democratic nominee, then another in November? Let Republicans choose the Democrat opponent?
    In all likelihood this will be decided on popular vote, I only hope Florida's count does not have an impact. God help us if (shades of 2000) the overall popular vote is thwarted because of a technicality involving (not counting) Florida!
    I blame the Democrat National Party for this fiasco and for not having the courage to defend their position(s). They should not fear being called bigoted if they are seen as questioning Barak???s qualifications; it is their job (and voters), and the role of super delegates. Truth hurts? Grow up!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse