TERROR WATCH
Michael Isikoff and
Mark Hosenball
Tainted Evidence
Canada tosses CIA terror testimony obtained through waterboarding.
The Canadian government is no longer using evidence gained from CIA interrogations of a top Al Qaeda detainee who was waterboarded.
According to documents obtained by NEWSWEEK, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), the country's national-security agency, last month quietly withdrew statements by alleged Al Qaeda leader Abu Zubaydah from public papers outlining the case against two alleged terror "sleeper" operatives in Ottawa and Montreal.
The move, which so far has received no public attention, is the latest sign of potential international fallout from the CIA's recent confirmation that it waterboarded a handful of high-profile Al Qaeda suspects in 2002 and 2003. The use of waterboarding and other harsh interrogation techniques were approved by the Bush White House and Justice Department. Waterboarding, which critics charge is a form of torture, involves strapping a suspect to an inclined board and forcing water into his lungs, typically by pouring water through a cloth placed over his nose and mouth.
The Canadian cases involve two men: Mohammed Harkat, an Algerian native living in Ottawa, and Moroccan-born Adil Charkaoui of Montreal. Both were arrested after the September 11 terror attacks and detained without charges on suspicions of links to Al Qaeda. Unable to develop enough evidence to bring criminal charges against either man, the CSIS sought to deport them on grounds that they had both allegedly spent time in Al Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan in the 1990s. (Both men now have been released on bail but remain under government scrutiny).
At least part of the case against the Canadian suspects was derived from the CIA-supplied statements of Zubaydah, the suspected Al Qaeda logistics chief who was arrested in Pakistan in 2002 and became the first high-value detainee subjected to waterboarding. A Canadian government dossier filed with the courts after Harkat's arrest, for example, stated that "a foreign agency" (an apparent reference to the CIA) "advised the Service [CSIS] in March 2003 that Abu Zubaida [sic] was able to identify the respondent [Harkat] by his physical description, including that he operated a guest house in Peshawar, Pakistan in the mid 1990s for mujahadeen travelling to Chechnya."
But last month, the CSIS filed a revised version of the dossier on Harkat as part of its case to deport the suspect. The new version deleted the detailed information from "the foreign agency" about Abu Zubaydah's identification of Harkat. Instead, in the new dossier, dated Feb. 22, 2008, the CSIS said simply that, "Based on its investigation, the Service concludes that HARKAT [sic] has associated with Abu Zubaydah [sic], one of [Osama] bin Laden's top lieutenants since the early 1990s." A footnote in the dossier attributes this information to news articles from the British press and to a counter terrorism newsletter published by a Chicago think tank.
Lawyer Paul Copeland, who represents Harkat, also provided NEWSWEEK with a letter sent to him in January by John Sims, Canada's deputy Justice minister, in which the government official said he could "confirm that [in Harkat's case] the Minister of Public Safety and the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration will not rely on information provided by Mr. Zubaida [sic]." Copeland also noted that similar allegations were deleted from an official CSIS report on Adil Charkaoui.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: jrj99999 @ 04/02/2008 1:40:26 PM
Comment: The title "Tainted Evidence" represents an inject opinion which is different than the story line -- Canada decides to ignore evidence from CIA. This does not mean that the evidence is tainted. If the journalists can't report facts, then the remainder of the article is also suspect. It would be useful to get unbiased observations.
Posted By: sjrboomz @ 03/12/2008 1:15:19 PM
Comment: Shame on us for opposing torture??
First off - No, torture is not effective. Confessions and information obtained through torture cannot be trusted to be accurate and truthful, as someone who is being subjected to immense pain and discomfort is willing to "disclose" whatever their torturer wants them to disclose. Acquiring information through torture is simply begging for false information that will lead investigators on a wild goose chase which, unbeknownst to their ignorant asses, is based on the information which they theymselves created and forced out of the mouth of their victim. You cannot trust confessions or information obtained through means of torture, because when a person is subject to such intense pain and discomfort, they become willing to "disclose" whatever is asked of them - regardless of the truth (or lack thereof) of the statement. On top of that danger, shall we venture to find out just how pissed off the family and friends of our tortured prisoners are?? Torture is a great way to increase hatred and anti-American sentiment. Good job Bushco... good job!
So there we have it... torture is only good for...
- Obtaining information that lacks any credit
- Sending government investigators on a wild goose chase
- Gving "enemies" even more reason to hate you
- Gving your own citizens even more reason to distrust their government and express resentment towards it
...sounds like a superb plan to me!!
Posted By: sjrboomz @ 03/12/2008 1:07:43 PM
Comment: Shame on us for opposing torture??
First off - No, torture is not effective. Confessions and information obtained through torture cannot be trusted to be accurate and truthful, as someone who is being subjected to immense pain and discomfort is willing to "disclose" whatever their torturer wants them to disclose. Acquiring information through torture is simply asking for false information that will lead investigators on a wild goose chase that, unbeknownst to their ignorant asses, was created by their invented truth which they forced out of a victim of torture. On top of that, the families and friends of those who have been subjected to torture are clearly going to be pretty pissed off about the mistreatment, thereby breeding yet more hatred towards the American government, and in effect, American people.
Nice plan for keeping your country safe.....