- 1
- 2
Tainted Evidence
Copeland said the Canadian government's decision to drop claims about Harkat and Charkaoui that came from the CIA's interrogations of Abu Zubaydah indicates "the government of Canada, or at least the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, has concluded that everything that came from Abu Zubaydah was obtained by torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment."
Asked why the statements from Zubaydah had been dropped from the dossiers against Harkat and Charkaoui, Bernard Beckhoff, a spokesman for Canada's public safety ministry, which oversees CSIS, said he could not comment on developments in either case because they are both still before the courts. But he then added, pointedly: "The CSIS director has stated publicly that torture is morally repugnant and not particularly reliable. CSIS does not knowingly use information which has been obtained through torture."
The CIA declined to comment on the CSIS's apparent rejection of the agency's evidence. Spokesman Paul Gimigliano told NEWSWEEK, "The agency's terrorist-detention program has been run in keeping with U.S. law. The Department of Justice deemed CIA's interrogation methods to be lawful at the time of their use."
But the development was immediately seized on by human-rights advocates as proof that the Bush administration's use of interrogation techniques rejected by the rest of the world will undermine counterterrorism cases in foreign courts. "This shows how the United States is shooting itself in the foot in terrorism cases," said John Sifton, the director of One World Research, a public-interest group that investigates human-rights abuses internationally.
The Canadian action comes as controversy within the United States over waterboarding and other "aggressive" interrogation methods is escalating. At a Capitol Hill hearing last month, CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden acknowledged for the first time that the CIA had used waterboarding on three Al Qaeda detainees: Zubaydah, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks) and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri (allegedly Al Qaeda's operations chief in the Persian Gulf). American and other intelligence agencies say that Zubaydah, a longtime bin Laden lieutenant of Palestinian origin, was in charge of pre-9/11 Al Qaeda training camps and guest houses in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
All three of the waterboarded suspects were held for years by the CIA in a still-secret network of clandestine detention centers. In September 2006, President Bush ordered them and about a dozen other CIA detainees transferred to the Guantánamo detention camp. The Defense Department recently charged Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and five other men with plotting the 9/11 plot in a case that will be tried under specially set up U.S. military tribunals. The cases, for which the suspects will face the death penalty, are expected to raise a host of complex legal issues about whether the men had been subjected to mistreatment by U.S. officials. (The Justice Department recently launched a criminal investigation into reports that CIA officials destroyed videotapes of interrogations of Zubayadah and Nashiri.)
The White House and Capitol Hill continue to be at odds over the issue: Congress recently approved an intelligence authorization bill that would expressly forbid the CIA from using waterboarding and certain other interrogation methods. Although it says the U.S. government no longer engages in waterboarding, the White House has signaled President Bush will veto the measure because he does not want to tie the agency's hands in the future.
Terror Watch appears weekly on Newsweek.com
© 2008
- 1
- 2


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: jrj99999 @ 04/02/2008 1:40:26 PM
Comment: The title "Tainted Evidence" represents an inject opinion which is different than the story line -- Canada decides to ignore evidence from CIA. This does not mean that the evidence is tainted. If the journalists can't report facts, then the remainder of the article is also suspect. It would be useful to get unbiased observations.
Posted By: sjrboomz @ 03/12/2008 1:15:19 PM
Comment: Shame on us for opposing torture??
First off - No, torture is not effective. Confessions and information obtained through torture cannot be trusted to be accurate and truthful, as someone who is being subjected to immense pain and discomfort is willing to "disclose" whatever their torturer wants them to disclose. Acquiring information through torture is simply begging for false information that will lead investigators on a wild goose chase which, unbeknownst to their ignorant asses, is based on the information which they theymselves created and forced out of the mouth of their victim. You cannot trust confessions or information obtained through means of torture, because when a person is subject to such intense pain and discomfort, they become willing to "disclose" whatever is asked of them - regardless of the truth (or lack thereof) of the statement. On top of that danger, shall we venture to find out just how pissed off the family and friends of our tortured prisoners are?? Torture is a great way to increase hatred and anti-American sentiment. Good job Bushco... good job!
So there we have it... torture is only good for...
- Obtaining information that lacks any credit
- Sending government investigators on a wild goose chase
- Gving "enemies" even more reason to hate you
- Gving your own citizens even more reason to distrust their government and express resentment towards it
...sounds like a superb plan to me!!
Posted By: sjrboomz @ 03/12/2008 1:07:43 PM
Comment: Shame on us for opposing torture??
First off - No, torture is not effective. Confessions and information obtained through torture cannot be trusted to be accurate and truthful, as someone who is being subjected to immense pain and discomfort is willing to "disclose" whatever their torturer wants them to disclose. Acquiring information through torture is simply asking for false information that will lead investigators on a wild goose chase that, unbeknownst to their ignorant asses, was created by their invented truth which they forced out of a victim of torture. On top of that, the families and friends of those who have been subjected to torture are clearly going to be pretty pissed off about the mistreatment, thereby breeding yet more hatred towards the American government, and in effect, American people.
Nice plan for keeping your country safe.....