EUROPE

Spanish Boxing

A respected commentator discusses which Spanish presidential candidate is more like Barack Obama, and why the campaign has become so nasty.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Consider the 2008 presidential campaign in Spain a rematch. After all, the two main candidates in this Sunday's general elections are the same as in 2004: José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, from the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE), and Mariano Rajoy, from the Popular Party (PP). Rajoy was the front runner last time, until the Madrid bombings, which led to a victory for the left-leaning PSOE, in part because of their promise to withdraw troops from Iraq. This time around, Zapatero remains popular, and is currently ahead in the polls. NEWSWEEK's Ana Elena Azpurua spoke with Andrés Ortega, director of the Spanish edition of Foreign Policy magazine and columnist at the Spanish newspaper El País, about this year's heated campaign and what worries the Spaniards. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: How is this campaign different from last time?
Andrés Ortega:
In general, the PP's campaign has been more focused on attacking the PSOE than on offering solutions. One PP ad shows a family at home. Zapatero's voice, denying that there is an economic crisis in Spain, plays in the background while the family's furniture is taken away. The socialist's campaign has been more voter mobilization. They know that with active participation they have a greater chance of winning.

How would you compare the Spanish campaign with the one taking place in the United States?
[Hillary] Clinton is more about constructing a coalition of voters around concrete proposals that satisfy different groups, while [Barack] Obama is more about broad strokes, about change and the Iraq War and less about details. In Spain, I believe Zapatero has had a very concrete campaign tailored to specific groups. Rajoy has had a more general campaign, stating that the PP has clear ideas and that proposals are not the most important thing--governing style is. Rajoy is more like Obama in the way they present their proposals, although when it comes to ideology, this is not the case. Zapatero is much closer to Obama than Clinton in that realm.

If you had to write an article summarizing this campaign, how would you title it?
"Campaigning Among Pit Bulls," meaning that the candidates are harshly confronted. The campaign reflects Spanish society, which is very divided, like many other advanced European societies and the United States.

What issues divide Spanish society?
Spaniards are most worried about the economy. They are not divided on that issue. The lines of division are elsewhere: the devolution process, especially with Catalonia and the Basque country; immigration, because Spain has become, in absolute numbers, the second-biggest immigration destination, after the U.S., and how to tackle the terrorist threat of an ETA that is weakened but nonetheless still capable of doing damage.

What issues have been neglected in this electoral race?
The candidates haven't talked much about foreign policy, which was one of the main topics during the 2004 election because of the Iraq War and the position that [former prime minister José María] Aznar took on that issue. There is a general agreement about some European issues, such as being opposed to the independence of Kosovo.

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: newlife64 @ 03/12/2008 3:49:17 PM

    Comment: some of you people really sound like uneducated idiots. defending Obama would be such a waste of time in this forum. I've heard middle and high school students raise much more intellegent and thought out concerns.

  • Posted By: hubbs @ 03/08/2008 3:43:31 PM

    Comment: lafit, maybe you should check out your mental health status, if you are not just outrightly lie or a racist at heart. By the way, readers here should take another look at who really won TEXAS:

    PRIMARY: 51-47 so 65 for Clinton, 61 for Obama
    CAUCUS: 37 for Obama, 30 for Clinton

    Clinton: 65 + 30 = 95
    Obama: 61 + 37 = 98
    =======================
    Obama WINS by 3 delegates!

    FOR POPULAR VOTE:
    Let's do a little math (Primary vote totals from ABC News):
    PRIMARY: Clinton 1,459,814 Obama 1,358,785
    CAUCUS: Clinton 440,000 Obama 560,000 (so far)
    Grand Popular Vote Totals (Primary + Caucus)
    Clinton 1,469,814 + 440,000 = 1,909,814
    Obama 1,358,785 + 560,000 = 1,918,785

    Obama WINS the popular vote as well!

  • Posted By: coll.env @ 03/07/2008 4:32:41 PM

    Comment: My ifrst name is George and after the Bush years of Slime and lies, I often feel like changing it !!
    A persons name does not make the person you IDIOT.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Luxury stadiums are on the rise. A top seat can cost $150,000. Beer costs extra.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
VIEWPOINT

The vast majority of Americans are dissatisfied with the direction of the country. So who are the 10 percent who think everything is A-OK?

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu