It is interesting that the state of Michigan and Florida should not be counted when Obama was the only one to campaign in BOTH states. His idea not to put his name on the ballot in Michigan was his own but he did run ads there. All a political ploy. The caucuses which did count were a mess. I attended one and the way that the votes were counted was ridiculous. We put up our hands and one person did a count!!!!! It was even a close count but they called it Obama win. How can that be considered appropriate? There was no one there to "keep them honest" as they say. We don't even know what credentials or political affiliations the person had who counted the votes. It was a sham!! If the democratic party can condone that mess then why would they disenfranchise the people of Michigan and Florida who had a well run voting process that was fair to all and slightly more fair to Obama in Florida since he was the ONLY democratic candidate who broke
the rules and campaigned there. That should have been a deal breaker alone and I don't understand why Hillary Clinton is not crying "foul" for being cheated there. Oh, that's right, no one can do that to Obama without him making it into a racist issue even though half the country is voting for the "protected one".
I would also like to mention at this time that in the last few days, all of the newworks have been featuring Obama regarding the passports violations even though all three candidates have had the same passport iolation. The only person they talked to about this was Obama. He got plenty of air time to help him try to wash away the Rev. Wright affiliation. Nevertheless, it won't wash, he did what he did and it is too big a problem for him to get rid of. Hillary Clinton has been very nice about not mentioning it which you Obama people have not taken notice of but the rest of the democrats and unfortunately, republicans have and while she is thinking about the party, the Republicans will "sink" him if he gets the democratic nod.
Delta Force
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
Greg Craig, an Obama aide who ran the State Department's influential policy planning office in the early Clinton years (and was later a White House lawyer who defended Bill Clinton in his Senate impeachment trial), penned a memo spelling out what he termed "exaggerated" claims about Hillary Clinton's national security credentials.
"She did not have security clearance," he wrote. "She did not attend meetings in the Situation Room. She did not manage any part of the national security bureaucracy, nor did she have her own national security staff … She never managed a foreign-policy crisis, and there is no evidence to suggest that she participated in the decision-making that occurred in connection with any such crisis.
"As far as the record shows, Senator Clinton never answered the phone either to make a decision on any pressing national security issue—not at 3 a.m. or at any other time of day."
Craig pointed to several recent claims by Clinton that she played a critical foreign policy role—in Northern Ireland, Bosnia, Kosovo and Rwanda. For instance, Clinton claimed in New Hampshire to have "helped to bring peace to Northern Ireland"—a suggestion that at least one of the central players in that peace process debunked as "a wee bit silly."
"It is a gross overstatement of the facts for her to claim even partial credit for bringing peace to Northern Ireland," wrote Craig.
In Bosnia, Clinton claimed to have dodged sniper fire on a March 1996 visit. The trip turned out to be a USO show that included the singer Sheryl Crow and the comedian Sinbad. In Kosovo, Clinton claimed to have opened the borders for refugees on a trip to a refugee camp in Macedonia. In fact, her trip took place the day after the borders were opened.
Discuss