WORLD AFFAIRS

Winning The Battle Of Kosovo

Yes, Europe and America back Kosovo's declaration of independence, but most of the world does not.

Jerome Sessini / Corbis
Stepping Up: Waving the flag in Pristina this month to celebrate Kosovo's independence
 
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

After years of violence and diplomatic wrangling, Kosovo, on Feb. 17, declared its independence, and within a day the world's most powerful nation, the United States, congratulated and recognized the newborn state. Britain also immediately recognized the war-torn nation, and in the days and weeks to come other big and wealthy nations would do likewise: France, Germany, Italy and Australia and two dozen others have all recognized Kosovo's sovereignty, representing, by one count, just more than half the world's GDP, and a majority of the members of NATO and the European Union.

But those figures obscure a central fact: while Kosovo has largely won its battle for recognition in Europe, Serbia is winning over the rest of the world. The vast majority of the United Nations' 192 members have withheld recognition, either by silence or explicit rejection. Brazil, China and India have all thus far refused to recognize the nascent nation, and Russia has not only rejected Kosovo's independence, but has become Serbia's proxy at the U.N. Security Council, vowing to veto any resolutions that would help clarify its status or grant Kosovo the ultimate symbol of sovereignty: a seat at the United Nations itself. Even some stalwart U.S. allies have rejected or remained silent on the Kosovo question, including Israel and Canada, as well as members of the European Union and NATO such as Spain, Cyprus and Slovakia.

Now, in a move that is virtually unprecedented in diplomatic history, Serbia is trying to reverse Kosovo's declaration of independence. At home, its leaders are threatening to retake Kosovo, stoking violence against the West with fiery rhetoric that echoes the former Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic. Abroad, Serbian officials are recalling ambassadors from nations that recognize Kosovo and lobbying to stop further recognitions by insisting Kosovo's actions are an illegal and dangerous precedent. Last week, in a speech at the U.N. Security Council, Serbian Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic urged nations that have already recognized Kosovo to "reconsider," and called upon those that have not "to stay the course."

So far, Serbia has been remarkably successful. While there's no magic number after which a country is considered truly sovereign, diplomats from the United States and Europe say Kosovo will acquire a critical mass after receiving recognition from somewhere between 50 and 100 countries. But as of mid-March, only 32 nations have recognized Kosovo, and though more may be forthcoming, the Serbian government expects a total of just 50 to sign on in the near future.

Countries have been slow to recognize for all sorts of reasons, including as a result of their own internal legal bureaucracies. Brazil, and to a certain extent India, are waiting for a critical mass of nations to form before going ahead themselves. Both countries want a seat at the U.N. Security Council but fear that getting too far ahead of the world on the Kosovo issue will antagonize Russia and China, both Security Council members with veto power. Islamic countries, noticeably slow to recognize a new Muslim nation, appear to be waiting for the nod from Saudi Arabia, which has thus far made no official statement on the matter.

But the numbers suggest countries the world over are also rejecting U.S. ideals of human rights, self-determination and what U.S. Sen. Joe Biden has called the "sacred trust between government and its people." For the United States, which declared its own independence after the people lost trust in King George, Kosovo's independence "upholds the ideal that people are entitled to govern themselves" when those people are minorities mistreated by their rulers, says Daniel Serwer, a former diplomat now at the United States Institute of Peace, a think tank.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: vojkan @ 04/15/2008 6:47:19 AM

    albanians are total foreigners to the balkans and indeed to europe and that their claims to being illyrians are baseless and based only on assumption.
    let's not permit the albanians to defile the noble illyrians by associating themselves with the noble illyrians!

  • Posted By: vojkan @ 04/15/2008 6:46:54 AM

    "albanian language is oldest on the face of earth"?

    how come then that first written inscription in albanian appears in 15 century? "canun of leka dukaqini"... if albanian language is oldest language in

    balkans, then how come that basic conversation words in albanian are from caucasus origin? how come that there are no linguistic influence of ancient greek

    and latin, but there are linguistic influence of modern green and aromanian (neo latin). if u are dardanians, how come that ALL toponyms in kosovo (also

    serbian word) are of SLAVIC serbian origin? serbian-PEC (furnace), albanised version PEJA. serbian-kosovska mitrovica (there are 200 mitrovica's in serbia,

    other famous is sremska mitrovica-in vojvodina), mitrovica-mitar's place, albanised-mitrovice kosoves serbian-djakovica (place of schoolong, from

    djak-pupil), albanised-djakove serbian-pristina (from PRIST-boil), albanised-prishtine. serbian-drenica (place where dren,a plant, grows), albanised-drenice.

    serbian-srbica (serbian place), albanised-serbic.

  • Posted By: vojkan @ 04/15/2008 6:46:43 AM

    thracians, like illyrians, celts, serbs, romans, russians, germans, alba nians and others where INDO-european. in IE languages we can find.

    kosovar albanians are descendants of malisori, skhumbi and hoti tribes of northern albania. kosovar albanians speak GHEG dialect identical to north

    albanian. malis ori, shkumbi and hoti started to penetrate in kosovo in 17 century, after great migration of serbs to north (after unsucesfull rebellion

    against turks). medieval serbian sources does not mention ARBANASI (albanians) in kosovo at all. if they always lived in kosovo (as descendants of

    dardanians), then serbian chronicles would be full of them... albanians where first mentioned as small nomadic sheperd tribe in teritory of todays central

    albania in 13 century... kosovar albanians cannot be descendants of dardanians. descendants of dardanians are macedonian VLACHS. serbs became christian in 8

    century, during the reign of zhupan (earl) VISHESLAV, ruler of ras (first serbian capital), visheslav was founder of visheslavich dynasty (first serbian

    ruling house).

    albanians dont call themselves albanians, but SHQIPTARI. in latin "alba"means "white". we have ALBION, which is britain (white island), ALBAIULIA (place in

    romania), ALBANIA (in caucasus), ALBANOI ( illyro-celtic tribe)... however albanians themselves call SHQIPTARI... there are more older names for

    albanians-ARNAUTES,ARNAUTI,ARBANASI...

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg