- 1
- 2
Why We Can’t Quit
So what's the answer, then?
We need to move on both the supply and demand sides simultaneously and urgently. On the supply side, we need to invest more. OPEC nations have about two thirds of the world's proven conventional crude reserves, and one third of its production capacity. So they certainly have the resource base to relieve the pressure. Saudi Arabia, for one, is spending $50 billion to increase their spare capacity by an extra 2 million barrels a day, which will provide a cushion for the world. Other countries should follow suit. But … first and foremost comes demand. We can't blame this problem on OPEC, because we have so much wasteful and inefficient consumption. The automobiles we have on the road today are quite inefficient—less than 20 percent of the fuel energy is actually converted to useful energy. We should certainly increase hybrid ownership, but I believe that hydrogen fuel cells are the breakthrough technology we need.
It appears to me that too many of these countries are using their oil revenues to subsidize their current populations' needs, rather than for long-term investments.
Directionally, you're right. Certainly some of these countries could do more. Iraq and Iran are critical. Outside of Saudi Arabia, they have the two biggest endowments in conventional oil reserves. But they're not investing enough. In Iraq, that's for obvious reasons—there's a security issue. In Iran, because of their political issues, they've limited reinvestment, too.
Are you pessimistic about the future?
To date, a total of 1 trillion barrels of oil have been produced, and it's conventionally understood that we have 2 trillion barrels left in the ground. That leads a lot of people to assume things are going to be fine. Unfortunately, the frontiers are getting more difficult to access, and some oil-producing nations are giving priority to their political agendas. The IEA [International Energy Agency] predicts global demand to average 98.5 million barrels a day in 2015; it's hard to see how we can meet that level of production. To have sustainable economic growth 10 years from now, both consumers and producers need to start acting now.
© 2008
- 1
- 2


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: smokey_joe @ 03/30/2008 1:18:42 PM
Comment: The final answer to Leon Hess and Fareed Zakaria is: "Yes we can quit OPEC oil by means of ethanol from biomass which will only cost one-third or less of the current cost of gasoline".
Posted By: david-fahey @ 03/22/2008 9:33:40 AM
Comment: fareed; do you know how many of the u.s. wellls that were capped in texas and okla. etc. during 'cheap oil' remain capped despite record oil prices? and how many 2000 dollars would it take to buy a bbl. of oil today?
Posted By: smokey_joe @ 03/20/2008 9:00:37 PM
Comment: To my knowledge, there is no such thing as a "water-powered car". Do you mean a hydrogen-powered car? The problem with most sources of hydrogen is that you have to consume the same energy in a fossil fuel in order produce hydrogen fuel. Hydrogen is difficult to store because it is so light and it easily escapes most container vessels.
Coskata Corporation ( www.coskata.com ) has stated that they can produce ethanol from non-food biomass for LESS THAN $1.00 PER GALLON in their joint announcement with General Motors Corporation. When their output volume increases to the level of imported OPEC oil, we will have achieved energy independence and the US economy will be restored to its former vibrancy. When ethanol from biomass becomes the dominant supplier in the American fuels marketplace, the threat of declining lifestyle in America will be eliminated and we can once again look forward to rising aspirations for future generations of Americans. When America becomes an ethanol exporter to the world, our trade deficit will be eliminated.