IRAQ

‘The Fight That We Are in Now’

Capt. Neil Hollenbeck is OK with battling an unconventional war

Lucian Read / Atlas Press for Newsweek
By the Book: With an anti-insurgent leader
 
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Capt. Neil Hollenbeck declines to second-guess whether America should have invaded Iraq. What he will say is this: "The reason we invaded Iraq to begin with and the reason we're fighting now are different. We're fighting different enemies now." He pauses to think. "The threat we're fighting now is instability and terrorism." Another pause. "The fight that we are in now is not one of our choosing. It's just one we're choosing not to walk away from." Questions of winning and losing are above his rank, he adds, although he thinks a stable Iraq, with a government that can grow into its responsibilities, is "obtainable."

That's why he's here, hunting down the last Al Qaeda in Iraq fighters in the rural Arab Jabour district, south of Baghdad. Hollenbeck and his troops live in an abandoned farmhouse with no running water or electricity, only a generator to run their radios and a light or two. He doesn't mind roughing it; that's part of the strategy. The main thing is to protect the people: you have to live among them, not on heavily fortified bases, as Gen. David Petraeus's counterinsurgency manual says. When the book first came out, Hollenbeck was at Fort Benning, taking classes in conventional warfare between deployments to Iraq. He remembers how good it felt to read something that actually applied to the unconventional conflict he had seen in Iraq.

In these croplands and orchards along the Tigris, the war is less about good and evil than about managing ambiguities (although the "wanted" list at the farmhouse is headed "Bad Dudes"). "As a counterinsurgent, you're winning when more and more of the people in the middle are leaning to you." Hollenbeck's father, an Army Ranger officer, saw close-up how Vietnam turned into a disaster. Compared with that war, Iraq these days is looking good.

© 2008

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: jumpj52 @ 03/28/2008 8:40:03 PM

    I think the US has made one of the worst military blunders in history. If its goal was to contain Iran, then why take out one its most hated enemies (Saddam Hussein).

    The post by Jack3213 is typical of the mindless bullshit republican radio puts out. Apparently he doesn't realize that it makes no difference whether its a republican or democrat who is in power. The CORPORATIONS are in control.

  • Posted By: Jack3213 @ 03/25/2008 8:34:38 AM

    THE DEMOCRATS IDEAS, PROCESSES, EXPERIANCE, & QUALIFICATIONS THAT ENABLE THEM TO DEAL WITH FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES ARE MINIMUL AT BEST. THEY CANNOT LET THINGS GO BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE THE INTELLIGENCE TO DO SO. THEY WILL DESTROY AND DEGRADE OTHERS FOR THEIR OWN GAIN INSTEAD OF WORKING TOGETHER FOR A COMMON GOOD. THEY ARE ALL ABOUT THEMSELVES AND THEIR EGOS' NOT THE ISSUE THAT WARRANTS SMART MINDED PEOPLE TO PERCEIVE REALITY AS IT IS AND TO DEAL WITH WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE SAFELY AND ACCURATELY. THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT AMERICANS THEY ONLY CARE ABOUT WINNING A'POSITION' AT ANY COST. THE DEMOCRATS ARE A TOTAL HYPOCRISY.
    THE INSRUGENTS, FELLA, ARE AIMING FOR THE USA ULTIMATELY- WAKE UP.

  • Posted By: nawawimohamad @ 03/18/2008 3:30:59 AM

    The insurgents are againts the US army and not against the Iraqi people. The soldiers must return home now. They are dying for nothing.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg