Democrat blames weak economy on Iraq war
The White House said the first economic stimulus package should be given a chance to work before a second is passed.
© 2008
STRATEGIES Harmonix, creator of Rock Band and Guitar Hero, is changing videogames.
Sponsored by
|
CAMPAIGN 2008 John McCain's choice to manage the GOP convention this summer is lobbyist Doug Goodyear, whose firm once represented Burma's repressive regime.
Sponsored by
|
Partners
Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: glimps @ 04/13/2008 2:23:13 PM
Comment: the Iraq people need to take control of their country.. we need to focus on finding the main guy that is responsible for 911..is no body upset that he is still living and sending via-video's about what cartoon portayal he does'nt like ... this is crazy!!! Americans are allowing him to live ( the longer we stay disillusioned).. Osama's main point on hijacking our planes (driving them into buildings) was to destroy our economy.. ( did he not do this ?) why is he still alive? and why are we in Iraq?
Posted By: JohnPolitico @ 04/13/2008 5:43:08 AM
Comment: Re: "Democrat blames weak economy on Iraq war"
CORRECTION! Democrats and "REAL" Republicans (not neoconvicts) blame weak economy on Iraq war!
Posted By: tjirish34 @ 04/12/2008 1:32:37 PM
Comment: ABOUT TIME! This has been my argument about finding away out of Iraq. People say "ohh we cannot leave now." Listen money does not grow on trees. It is no coincidence that this country's infrastructure is decaying and our living lifestyle has declined. This war was suppose to cost a fraction of what it has and is costing. THIS CANNOT CONTINUE! We are weakening our entire country because of the war cost. Not only in money but in our armed forces lives and readiness. Bush administration had this great plan of bases in iraq etc... A much more reasonable way to get out of iraq is prop up the Iraq government in place and then use a base in Kuwait with about 30,000 to 40,000 troops. This would be an alert force. When their is a hot spot in Iraq these forces come in and provide support or fight. So yes this would be a permanent force unfortunately. Plus you have some support troops such as trainers, security etc.. In Iraq. But the cost for a 30,000 - 40,000 troop force around iraq is alot less inexpensive then what we have now. These military commanders who offer advice etc... They do not factor in how long the cost will be or where the money is coming from. As long as the course is followed. This country is ruining it's future for it's children. Boy Bush is just... What can you say that has not already been said? Bush leaving with a war he started and dumping it off on next President. Next President will most likely be criticizes by ex Bush officials as he tries to extract us from Iraq. Going to war with iran? What a joke that idea is. Plus Bush leaving country in a recession. THANKS GEORGE!! DON'T LET THE DOOR HIT YOUR ASS ON THE WAY OUT!!