Saddam’s Files
They show terror plots, but raise new questions about some U.S. claims.
President Bush said lots of things about Saddam Hussein in the run-up to the Iraq War. But few of his charges grabbed more attention than an unscripted remark he made at a Texas political fund-raiser on Sept. 26, 2002. "After all, this is a guy who tried to kill my dad at one time," Bush said. The comment referred to a 1993 claim by the Kuwaiti government—accepted by the Clinton administration—that the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) had plotted to assassinate President George H.W. Bush during a trip to Kuwait that spring. Ever since, armchair psychologists have suggested that personal revenge may have been one reason for the president's determination to overthrow Saddam's regime.
But curiously little has been heard about the allegedly foiled assassination plot in the five years since the U.S. military invaded Iraq. A just-released Pentagon study on the Iraqi regime's ties to terrorism only adds to the mystery. The review, conducted for the Pentagon's Joint Forces Command, combed through 600,000 pages of Iraqi intelligence documents seized after the fall of Baghdad, as well as thousands of hours of audio- and videotapes of Saddam's conversations with his ministers and top aides. The study found that the IIS kept remarkably detailed records of virtually every operation it planned, including plots to assassinate Iraqi exiles and to supply explosives and booby-trapped suitcases to Iraqi embassies. But the Pentagon researchers found no documents that referred to a plan to kill Bush. The absence was conspicuous because researchers, aware of its potential significance, were looking for such evidence. "It was surprising," said one source familiar with the preparation of the report (who under Pentagon ground rules was not permitted to speak on the record). Given how much the Iraqis did document, "you would have thought there would have been some veiled reference to something about [the plot]."
The failure does not, of course, prove that the Iraqis were not planning such an operation. "It would not have surprised me at all if the Iraqis expunged any record of that—it was an utter embarrassment for them," says Paul Pillar, the CIA's former top analyst on the Middle East. But others have wondered whether the original allegations were exaggerated. The Kuwaiti claim grew out of the arrest of a band of whisky smugglers near the Iraq border that spring. Kuwaiti authorities also recovered a Toyota Land Cruiser containing 175 pounds of explosives connected to a detonator. After several days in Kuwaiti custody, the smugglers' ringleader, Wali al-Ghazali, confessed that he had been dispatched by an Iraqi intelligence agent to blow up former president Bush. Amnesty International questioned whether al-Ghazali (the only one to claim that Bush was the target) had been tortured. But when an FBI team concluded that the detonator and explosives closely resembled other Iraqi bombs, President Clinton ordered a Tomahawk cruise-missile strike on IIS headquarters. Years later Kuwait's emir declined to sign al-Ghazali's death warrant and commuted the sentences of four of the six convicted plotters. "It was always a circumstantial case," says Judith Yaphe, another former CIA analyst on Iraq. A White House spokesman declined to comment, but a U.S. intelligence official said, "It remains our view that Saddam's government had a hand" in the 1993 plot, and that information since the war "lends further credence" to that view.
Evidence of the Bush plot wasn't the only thing the Pentagon researchers couldn't find. There were also no records showing what the report called a "smoking gun" connection between Saddam's regime and Al Qaeda—one of the principal claims made by the White House to advance the case for war. The report did find plenty of evidence that Saddam's regime had close ties to other (mainly Palestinian) terror groups and had maintained contacts with some radical Islamic movements—including, according to one 1993 document, Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Last week Vice President Dick Cheney said the document showed there was a "link between Iraq and Al Qaeda." But Pillar notes the Egyptian group—headed by Ayman al-Zawahiri—didn't merge with Al Qaeda until years later. "This is the same kind of word game they played before the war," Pillar says.
Perhaps most revealing of all was a tape of Saddam's conversations with his ministers after the World Trade Center bombing in February 1993—a plot linked to a group of Islamic radicals, one of whom, Abdul Rahman Yasin, was an Iraqi-American who fled to Baghdad after the attack. For years Bush administration officials like Cheney and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz charged that Iraq had given "sanctuary" to Yasin, suggesting that the regime may have been complicit in the 1993 bombing. But the newly discovered tape shows that Saddam and his ministers were puzzled by the bombing and wondered whether the "Zionists" or U.S. intelligence were secretly behind it. They also were deeply suspicious of Yasin, whom the Iraqis had in custody and were interrogating. Yasin, Saddam says on the tape, is "too organized in what he is saying and is playing games." The Pentagon researcher said the exchange shows how "paranoid and suspicious" the Iraqis were about their adversaries. They may not have been alone.
© 2008


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: burbank @ 04/25/2008 1:04:46 AM
Comment: To: Sultan Ahmed: As to your question why can't America impose peace in the region? My answer is that we cannot impose peace on anybody. You must first impose peace upon yourselves. Until you repudiate the tenents of your religion that mandate the wanton destruction of human life through the construct of jihad, until you accept the social and religious pluralism that is the foundation of modern society and allow all no matter what their view choose by free will the outcome of their own destiny; when you can do this, then there will be peace.
Posted By: Sultan Ahmed @ 04/08/2008 6:36:10 PM
Comment: War,sucession,control and peace,these three are uphill task for conqueror.
The world has admitted that United States defeated largest Iraqi army and occupied a oil-producing country in the name of weapons of mass destruction but you all knew that more than six lacs of people were killed during and after the the war including innocent women and childern.
Fact of the day is that war is still going on,american millitary and allied forces is in action today against,they described them as terrorists.
There is no peace,law and order situation and safety of common man as well.people has begun remember Saddam's rule.
My question is that being a supper power they can not impose peace in the region why?
United States has vast sources inspite of it he looks failed.America can see the ways through which insurgency penetrates into the country and destroy hoorible situation.In this way,american credibility,ablility and leadership's
eligibility has become a sign of interogation before the political wisdom.
Posted By: eddiewhere @ 04/07/2008 1:14:12 AM
Comment: All Americans all willing to sacrifice for this great country. It is not the first time we have saved a nation. In fact, we have saved the modern world from Hitler, Communism and now FUNDAMENTALISTs who are indoctrinating all Muslims around the world, of all races to wage JIHAD. GOD HAS SENT US TO DEFEAT FUNDAMENTALIST ALL AROUND THE WORLD. EVEN THE ONES THAT LOOK LIKE US. AL QUEDA IS ACTIVELy RECRUITING WESTERN LOCAL INDIVIDUALS TO WAGE JIHAD.
We HAVE SHOWN THE WORLD WE CAN FIGHT AND WILL DEFEND OUR FREEDOM AT ALL COSTS. THIS IS WHY you have the freedom of sPeech SAM. BECAUSE the AMERICAN ARMy kicks a== and no fighting force on this Planet can match us. WE are Willing to Take heavY losses. THE WORLD THOUGHT WE WERE WEAK and would back down from a FIGHT. HUSSEIN was a mass BUTCHER. A RUTHLESS BULLY. We annihalated him and now he laYs in a grave beside his two sick dead sons in Tirkirt. GOD BLESS AMERICA. AMERICA STANDS UP TO THOSE BULLIES WHO THE WORLD CANNOT HANDLE.
THE Problem is, the CHINESE government thinks theY can do what theY want all the time. Their theft of coPYrighted material is
unPrecedented in WORLD HISTORY. NEVER HAS ONE NATION STOLE so MUCH.
WE ARE ABOUT TO LET THE CHINESE GOVERMENT know that theY cannot do as theY Please with us as theY do with their own PeoPle.
TIANANMEN SQUARE MASSACRE involved the Chinese Government killing their own PeoPle. We honored our Vietnam Vets bY building the VIETNAM memorial. The Chinese should unveil their memorial for the Chinese victims who were run over bY tanks, on direct orders from their own government, at the uPcoming OLYm ics.
goldenstars i see what You ar trYing to saY However it is a flawed argument.
Communism is about controlling individual freedom. The Chinese government massacared their own PeoPle. THAT IS A FACT. IT haPPened a couPle of years ago.
WE the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA are THE WORLD"S ONLy SUPERPOWER. WE SAVED THE IRAQIS, SOUTH KOREANS, VIETNAMESE, EUROpE, the Great British EmPire, BOSNIA, and the CHiNESE IN MANCHURIA.
WE can annhilate anY nation in thirtY five minutes.
WE need a President who can handle CHINA AND RUSSIA.
THE KURDS LOVE US. WE DESTROyED SADDAM and exPosed him for the coward he reallY is.
WE SAVED IRAQ. Unfortunately, it took the Iraqi's a while to realize they should work with us so they can Preserve their freedom. All Iraqils aPPreciate their freedom. SOON they will be willing to die for their freedom just like us AMERICANS. GOD BLESS AMERICA THE GREATEST NATION ON EARTH.
Russia WAS a suPerPower. WE WON THE COLD WAR AND WON VIETNAM IN THE LONG RUN.
AS A RESULT there are manY VIETNAMESE LIVING THE AMERICAN DREAM.
The Vietnamese should build their own memorial for the one million VIETCON that were eliminated by our suPERIOR AMERICAN FORCES. OBVIOUSLy your weaPons were out of date and could not stoP the Napom.