BETWEEN THE LINES
Jonathan Alter
Hillary’s Consolation Prize?
Some Dems float the New York Statehouse as an option.
Some Democrats terrified that their bloody primary campaign will doom them in November are floating a consolation prize for Hillary Clinton: governor of New York.
The travails of New York Gov. David Paterson have opened up a new potential career path for Clinton, according to well-informed Democratic Party insiders who refused to allow their names to be used when discussing contingencies. They want her to consider the option if she concludes after the April 22 Pennsylvania primary that she cannot overtake Barack Obama for the party's presidential nomination. Hillary Clinton, while fully committed to continuing her presidential campaign, was said to be open to discussing the idea, while Bill Clinton rejected it out of hand.
With former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani now reported by the New York Post to be weighing a race for governor, voters could see a Clinton-Giuliani matchup after all.
Paterson, a former state senator and lieutenant governor, succeeded Gov. Eliot Spitzer, who was forced to resign earlier this month when he was caught in a prostitution ring. A legally blind African-American with plenty of friends in Albany, Paterson has admitted to extensive drug use when he was young and to having had several extramarital affairs, including one with a New York state employee. The governor has denied using taxpayer money for the affairs, but new rumors are swirling around the scandal-weary state capital.
In the event that Paterson had to resign, the New York State Constitution calls for a gubernatorial election this November. Clinton would be the favorite in that contest if she were interested. Were a politically wounded Paterson to serve out Spitzer's term, which ends in 2010, Clinton would no doubt be a strong potential candidate to succeed him.
Under the scenario sketched out by the insiders, serving two years as governor would give Clinton the executive experience to become the prohibitive favorite for the 2012 Democratic presidential nomination. Clinton believes that Barack Obama may well lose this year to John McCain, who would be 75 in 2012 and a possible one-term president. Clinton would arguably be better positioned to replace McCain in the White House as a governor than as a senator.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: pjonathan @ 05/27/2008 10:52:31 AM
Comment: I think the best way for the dem presidential race to end is to have NY governor and Hillary trade places.
Posted By: mikelaoc @ 04/04/2008 10:48:07 AM
Comment: Even if Hillary beats Obama she will lose to McCain.
McCain needs to choose Rudy as VP and Hillary will get crushed.
Rudy should have been the Republican nominee but VP will do for now.
Watch this video and you will understand why !
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RRODJcPq_Js
Posted By: powin @ 04/03/2008 11:20:41 AM
Comment: Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 04/01/2008 15:00:47
Comment: It's worked out fine because everyone gets to see again the real HRC: liar par excellence.
Elizabeth,
Newsweek readers seem to forget the relevance of some of the largest untruths to be told: Large volumes of documents relating to the Iran-Contra scandal were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials. The affair is still shrouded in secrecy. After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, President Ronald Reagan appeared on national television and denied that they had occurred. The foreign branch of the US intelligence community still denies that they helped bin Laden recruit radical Islamic "fighters" that they trained to fire hand-held missiles, to detonate explosives and employ guerrilla tactics; they provided funding for the Taliban during the Soviet-Afghanistan War, which, ultimately, helped bring about the demise of the Soviet Union. In violation of the Boland Amendment, Reagan outwardly lied to the American public and yet his illustrious presidency remains untarnished.