You Can't Take It With You
_______________________
Astoria, NY: First off, I was very impressed by the article. I would like to know what message exactly you are trying to get out to the youth. That Social Security and Medicare are gonna evaporate before we reach the age of qualifying for it? Or that the state of current economic affairs in this country are set-up in a way that it's giving even more privilege to the privileged class? (Through deregulation in the financial industry and tax codes.) I got a hint of both from the article, but I'm not sure exactly what your foundation is meant to drive home.
Peter Peterson: While it is certainly true that, absent reform, Social Security and Medicare benefits could be sharply reduced for the young when they retire. But, more than that, these benefits, in the meantime, would be going to 78 million baby boomers, twice the number of elderly that we have now. So, the young now kind of have the worst of both worlds. Not only are their benefits likely to be reduced when they retire, but, in the meantime, they will be stuck with the huge bills that are involved in meeting the benefits of the 78 million baby boomers. It is also true that inequality of income is much higher than I can remember it being. That is why I could be for a program that not only involves benefit reform and reduction for everyone but the poor tied to increased marginal rates on teh well off.
_______________________
Milwaukee, Wisconsin: If corporations are acting in their own interest, are we at a tipping point where it is in their interest to help preserve the planet, the economy and the American way of life? Or do you think there is a perception that we can continue blindly on the current path?
Peter Peterson: Too many people in business and elsewhere have an aggravated case of "short-termitis" and a denial of these long term challenges that most of us who study these things beleive are undeniable, unsustainable and, yet, politically untouchable. It is overwhelmingly in the interest of the business community to have long term economic growth because what tends to be good for the economy tends to be good for business. Trying to energize the business community to confront these long term challenges is one of the key objectives of my new foundation.
_______________________


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: jwaxtell @ 04/03/2008 11:59:07 AM
Comment: If this is what is called a live talk it seems pretty dead to me. I am not getting any input from anyone nor any responses to my comment at 11:37 and it is 12:07. that is a bit more than a few minutes
Posted By: jwaxtell @ 04/03/2008 11:27:23 AM
Comment: Dear Mr. Peterson:
Thank you for taking the time to discuss your thoughts with us.
I am a volunteer at a K ??? 12 alternative school and have been impressed with one program that was made available free to us ??? textbooks and all ??? about personal financial responsibility and planning.
Would your foundation consider funding ???open books??? available free of charge to be downloaded as well as free DVDs that could be duplicated free of charge.
One of the major problems we have is that there is no curriculum that we can afford that deals with the issues we feel are necessary to teach. There is no curriculum that discusses our constitution, the financial system, and how students (voters) can work to make changes.
As it is now you buy the entire text or none of it. The amount of money available to teachers to buy texts is, to say the least, minimal.
I recently bought a book on a database program for $10 and it was a download. I am able to print the book out page by page and use what I want of it. This is affordable and allows me the flexibility I need.
Sorry for the double post before ??? I am just learning how to use this format.
I would also suggest that you consider other formats for national discussions ??? ones that would allow the page to be more of a chat room.
John Axtell
funlife@centurytel.net
Posted By: jwaxtell @ 04/03/2008 11:17:05 AM
Comment: How can we submit a one page proposal to your foundation