Quantcast
 
 
 
Cover Story

Just the Tree of Us

Driven by public concern, all the candidates agree that action is needed to slow global warming. No matter who's elected, America's policy will be different a year from now.

 
Discuss
 
Member Comments
  • Posted By: Deadbattery @ 05/10/2008 10:44:00 PM

    Comment: Anyone can stick their head in the sand and pretend we are not polluting ourselves and most other species to extinction. Ask the Inuit people, watch the changes in weather in Australia, Africa,and even America and the devastation, desertification, loss of species and change in vegetative growth patterns. The question isnt are we changing our environment,, but will our envvirontment change us in time

  • Posted By: trapshooter @ 04/29/2008 11:13:43 PM

    Comment: I have one question... how can someone win the nobel peace prize for campaining against something that does not exist? That has been bothering me since he "won" the thing

  • Posted By: trapshooter @ 04/29/2008 11:12:42 PM

    Comment: I have one question... how can someone win the nobel peace prize for campaining against something that does not exist? That has been bothering me since he "won" the thing

  • Posted By: galaxyvet @ 04/27/2008 8:30:14 AM

    Comment: It really gets my dander up when I read or hear a discussion on global warming that makes the assumption that it is a truth set in stone and that human activity is the sole cause. Only by changing the behavior of everyone on the planet can we save ourselves from extinction. Quite the contrary. The scientifice community is evenly split on global warming, its existence and its cause. The temperature drop over the earth this past year wiped out the 0.6C average warming of this century. The ice pack in Anartica is now at the greatest on record. Maybe the scientific community's warning of the 70's of a coming global ice age is more appropriate?
    If all of mankind's production of CO2 were stopped tomorrow, it would only account for 4% of the total in the atmosphere. If CO2 was the cause of "global warming", how much effect could that have on the overall climate? The more salient theory is that the sun is blasting out more enery in the form of sun spots. Whenever this has occurred in the past, the earth's temperature rises; when they disappear, it cools, as it did in the 'mini ice age" of the last century. Some scientists say that the rise in CO2 levels are not a cause of rising temperatures but a result. I'm all for reducing pollutants in the atmosphere; they can't be good for us- global warming or not, but there appears to be a sinister political motivation with the hysteria being created around this issue. Many people are becoming filthy rich off the "green machine". Check out the agri-business moguls in corn, Al Gore's carbon tax. There's got to be a better way to address environmental issues.

  • Posted By: foreignspeak @ 04/13/2008 12:21:16 PM

    Comment: Sigh. @ChuckRG: Let's substitute; "There is a lot of money involved in the "fossil fuels" business, and they don't want to hear." Do a Google search on "GLOBAL WARMING DENIER". There are not "many" but rather a few climate scientists who are skeptics. Nature doesn't care about your suspicions, fears, deficit of critical thought. It's responding to the amount of crap we've dug up from the Earth and blown into the atmosphere. Try to understand this, the future of the species depends on it.

  • Posted By: foreignspeak @ 04/13/2008 12:20:42 PM

    Comment: Sigh. @ChuckRG: Let's substitute; "There is a lot of money involved in the "fossil fuels" business, and they don't want to hear." Do a Google search on "GLOBAL WARMING DENIER". There are not "many" but rather a few climate scientists who are skeptics. Nature doesn't care about your suspicions, fears, deficit of critical thought. It's responding to the amount of crap we've dug up from the Earth and blown into the atmosphere. Try to understand this, the future of the species depends on it.

  • Posted By: ChuckRG @ 04/12/2008 9:58:00 PM

    Comment: There is a lot of money involved in the "carbon credits" business, and they don't want to hear that man cannot really change the warming very much by reducing CO2 emissions. Do a Google search on "GLOBAL WARMING SCAM." Many scientists who formerly supported the theory are now skeptics. And there is evidence that increased CO2 is caused by global warming, not the other way around. As the worlds waters heat up, CO2 is released, much as from a warm can of pop. I think the global warming situation really is a money-making, unscientific scam.

    • Posted By: summer4077 @ 04/23/2008 14:24:43

      Comment: I just don't understand people like you. Have you ever seen a factory pumping out nasty black smoke, or a car spewing black exhaust down the road? I'm sure you have. Then think about how many THOUSANDS of factories and MILLIONS of cars there are in this country. Then think about all the OTHER countries on this planet. There's just no way we can pour that much noxious gas into the air and NOT have negative consequences. The numbers are just overwhelming.

  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/12/2008 1:51:02 PM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green, and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs, have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut or Mexican friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for himself and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin, carbon taxed, formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    Environ mental ist defined: Individuals that want others to use less energy; almost invariably the Goree truth.

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are pretty good odds.

  • Posted By: realpages @ 04/12/2008 12:53:48 PM

    Comment: Obama - Not the Green Candidate - He's the Wright Candidate, the Wright Man, for the Wright Job!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIM6omlbQKM

    Is this the Wright tIme for American? No-No-No!!!
    White America, US of KKKA. No-No-No!!!

  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/11/2008 4:42:54 PM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green, and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs, have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut or Mexican friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for himself and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin, carbon taxed, formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    Environ mental ist defined: Individuals that want others to use less energy; almost invariably the Goree truth.

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are pretty good odds.

  • Posted By: nanci @ 04/11/2008 3:11:12 PM

    Comment: I am not running for office, but I would not allow my kids or myself to associate with any of these men, and yet you are still talking about the Bosnia lie. I think you really need to reevaluate the way you are thinking, or this country could get in to the wrong hands of an unknown, with haters of America beside him.

    God Bless and Protect this country.

  • Posted By: nanci @ 04/11/2008 3:10:30 PM

    Comment: I've read a lot of the comments and I disagree with the way a lot of people on this blog are talking.

    Sure, Hillary exaggerated her Bosnia deal. Maybe she lied, or maybe she tried to make it look like she had more experience then she did. Whatever the reason it really isn't that big a deal. You have to admit that all the politicians exaggerate and lie. What she said didn't harm anyone, but the media has made it the biggest issue since 911.

    Now lets step back and look at Obama a man who wants change. Here is a man who has had a 20 year relationship with a Pastor that hates whites, his anti-American, hates jews, honors Farrahkan, calls Italian's Jesus haters. Obama has said this man has been his mentor for 20 years and did not know the views this man held. Then he said he did know, but he disagrees with them. Would you want a man like this with this type of hatred of America and whites be your Pastor? Would you want this man preaching to your kids in church? If you answer honestly, the only answer you could come up with is no. Pastor Wright is not a man of change, but a man who is filled with hatred and stuck in the past. He is feeding hate to all who attend that church. Then we look further into Obama's past and we find out he is certainly friendly, reported by his Campaign Manager, with Bill Ayers. Bill Ayers who bombed the pentagon, bomb police headquarters, and the Captiol Building. Bill Ayers said he didn't think he did enough. He hates the government and America too. Then their is Rezko, who Obama knew was charged with corruption, etc., and he is friends with him and does real estate deals with him. Then we find out about Rev Meeks who Obama is very close to and he preaches the same hate, and is on the same page as Pastor Wright. The Mrs. Obama says this is the first time in my adult life that I have been proud of America. Granted we don't know much about Obama, but if we are to base our opinions on what we do know it has to make us pause. Is this the man we want to be our President? A man who associates with these haters. It has to make you wonder what type of change this man wants. It has to make you fearful of what could happen to this country. He has a cousin in Kenya who is part of the Jihad. He has helped him on several occasions. When Obama was asked to produce his paper trail while State Senator, he said they didn't keep papers. Now come on, why isn't he held to the same standards as all the other candidates? Why aren't you more concerned about this unknown man, with such a shady past? Do you love this country? Do you really trust this man who associates with all these terrorists type people? Remember you are who your friends are. Birds of a feather flock together.


  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/11/2008 9:17:13 AM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green, and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs, have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut or Mexican friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for himself and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin, carbon taxed, formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    Environ mental ist defined: Individuals that want others to use less energy; almost invariably the Goree truth.

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are pretty good odds.

  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/11/2008 9:06:29 AM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for him and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin carbon taxed formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    Environ mentalist defined: Individuals that want others to use less energy; almost invariably the Goree truth.

  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/10/2008 9:15:14 PM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for himself and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin carbon taxed formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are pretty good odds.

  • Posted By: srgill @ 04/10/2008 7:56:30 PM

    Comment: With all the recent controversy regarding corn being grown to support ethanol production rather than as part of the food chain, when is someone going to speak up on behalf of switchgrass? It seems to be a viable alternative to the mass production of ethanol as well as useful chemical by-products. Also, bamboo is finding more uses in the market place, from flooring to clothing.

    Can you see it now - an American farmer dressed in soft as silk clothing made from bamboo, driving a tractor fueled by a bio-fuel refined from his very own crop of switchgrass?

    The technology seems to be currently available. Let's go for it and release us from the stranglehold of the ever-rising price of almighty oil.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 04/10/2008 21:14:41

      Comment: srgill: Cellulose ethanol thank you. Where is Bush and congress; out to lunch raising funds instead of raising ethanol plants and cellulose crops. We have been sold out; How is it that our leadership is not demanding and actively pursuing cellulose ethanol energy independence now?

  • Posted By: srgill @ 04/10/2008 7:55:37 PM

    Comment: With all the recent controversy regarding corn being grown to support ethanol production rather than as part of the food chain, when is someone going to speak up on behalf of switchgrass? It seems to be a viable alternative to the mass production of ethanol as well as useful chemical by-products. Also, bamboo is finding more uses in the market place, from flooring to clothing.

    Can you see it now - an American farmer dressed in soft as silk clothing made from bamboo, driving a tractor fueled by a bio-fuel refined from his very own crop of switchgrass?

    The technology seems to be currently available. Let's go for it and release us from the stranglehold of the ever-rising price of almighty oil.

  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/10/2008 7:16:56 PM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for himself and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin carbon taxed formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are pretty good odds.

  • Posted By: Norm Voiles @ 04/10/2008 3:57:58 PM

    Comment: The caricature of the three candidates on Page 42 of the current issie is a blatant example of slanted/biased reporting. Hillary is depicted as some sort of idiot with that big gren, McCain is made to look like an escaped lunatic, while Newsweek's pet candidate, Obama, gazes into the future with a solumn, thoughtful appearance. I ask you to take another look a the picture; see if you see the same deliberately slanted editorialism that seems to jump right off the page for me. Of course, he is shown in the front of the group--hence a bigger head.

  • Posted By: Norm Voiles @ 04/10/2008 3:52:39 PM

    Comment: The caricatures of the three candidates shown on Page 42 ot the current issue demonstrates how easily bias and slants can be displayed in even a seemingly harmless cartoon. Hillary is sporting an idiotic grin, McCain actually looks like an escaped lunatic, while Obama, Newsweek's favored candidate, appears to be thoughtful as he gazes out with a calm, dignity. Don't bother denying it--this is a gross case of slanted reporting, disquised as a cartoon.

  • Posted By: iamgjg @ 04/10/2008 3:50:48 PM

    Comment: Regarding our (Human Beings) contribution to global warming, If you believe in the Theory of Evolution, we should have nothing to fear. According to Darwin, we have evolved from a series of beneficial mutations over an extended period of time. Beneficial mutations that aid in our species survival. This is why polar bears are white and ducks have webbed feet. It is also why human beings have large brains. This naturally includes our ability to think, reason and problem solve. Our intelligence, and ability to create, would not have evolved into what it is today had it not aided in our survival and existence. Our ability to self-destruct does not aid in our survival, therefore is contrary to evolutionary theory. Outside of natural disaster a species becomes extinct only from it???s inability to adapt to it???s environment. Human beings contribution to global warming (beyond a natural cycle) is contrary to evolutionary theory. Taking that into consideration, human beings (the most evolved of all life) should be ???beneficial??? for the environment in which they live. A natural balance (according to Darwin) must occur for a species to survive. This is found to be true throughout the natural world.

    Having said that, not only are we capable of destroying ourselves, it appears as though we are doing so. The theory of Intelligent Design doesn???t even allow for this phenomenon. That would mean the ???intelligent??? design was not so intelligent after all.

    Natural selection is in direct contrast to our species ability to self-destruct. Intelligent design would mean there would have to be some purpose to our extinction. Creation with ???free will??? allows for both.

    George Gordon
    Los Angeles, CA

  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/09/2008 10:05:49 PM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for himself and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin carbon taxed formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are pretty good odds.

  • Posted By: jdunham @ 04/09/2008 4:54:18 PM

    Comment: Actually Carbon Monoxide does contribute to global warming because it controls the major greenhouse gases. "Air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and non-methane hydrocarbon (NMHC) produce OH radicals, which affect tropospheric ozone and methane levels, and hence they are called indirect greenhouse gases."

    http://www.jamstec.go.jp/frcgc/eng/akimoto/010502/

  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/08/2008 9:51:17 PM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for himself and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin carbon taxed formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are pretty good odds.

  • Posted By: cynthiatherrien @ 04/08/2008 7:57:08 PM

    Comment: "The questions weren't 'Do you think global warming is happening?' but 'How are you going to deal with it, what's your approach?'" And just in case you missed this part: Climate-change skeptics and deniers sometimes charge that the threat of global warming is a conspiracy kept alive by the media, but the reality seems rather different. The League of Conservation Voters tracks how often candidates are asked about environmental issues in televised debates and interviews, and the current tally shows that of 3,231 questions by the leading political reporters from five networks, exactly eight concerned global warming.."

  • Posted By: cquint @ 04/08/2008 5:25:10 PM

    Comment: When will the people of the United States wake up and smell the green running out of thier pockets? If these politicians and green enviornmentalists don't stop with this DUMB and inaccurate idea of Global Warming, then the only warming we are going to see is from the backside of a foriegn nuke war head destroying everyone in its path. Al Gore Global Warming is a MYTH. All he and his followers are trying to do is make more money by creating unnecessary taxes (carbon tax) and throw the world economy into a downward spiral because these people want to wean the U.S. off of Oil. But oil is our friend!! It is the only and chepest source of energy we have and stop trying to say otherwise! Ask any Global Warming activist what causes the supposed heating of the Earth's atmosphere? They will tell you 99.9% of the time Carbon Dioxide. Well Ive got news for you Carbon Dioxide or CO2 occurs naturally in the atmosphere. That is what green plants thrive off of through a process of photosynthesis which is how green plansts EAT! The emiisions from burning fossil fuels is Carbon Monoxide or CO. This is what we call in the world of chemistry as a different physical makeup of gas. This does not naturally occur in the atmosphere as a matter of fact it is a poisonous gas, and can be harmful if breathed in excessive amounts. Hence the reason someone would sit in a running car in the garage to commit suicide. Global warming has been disproved hundreds of times but liberal thinkers such as the fly-by media are trying to make it into something that is nothing! STOP IT. Or we will all be in for a revolutionary WAR!

    • Posted By: summer4077 @ 04/23/2008 14:28:02

      Comment: Well, I'd rather be on the safe side and pay a carbon tax that will benefit our own country, than an oil tax that benefits the countries that attack us.
      What's to lose? I mean, if they're wrong about global warming and it IS a myth (which I'm 99% sure it's not)...what's the worst that can happen? Cleaner air and water, more trees, no smog-filled, dirty cities.

  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/08/2008 1:58:59 PM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for himself and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin carbon taxed formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are pretty good odds.

  • Posted By: jjahns @ 04/08/2008 1:17:11 PM

    Comment: Bahahaha. Some of these conspiracy theories are WILD and FUNNY!

    I'd love to find someone who can actually state a legitimate source for their wild bs! So far, NONE has. If I have had to provide links, I have at least done that.

    The moral of this is: do your own homework on the candidates. Stop being lazy and actually do something. And a lot of you wonder why the country is in the state it is? I LOL at you all.

    At least some people on here try, and that's commendable. But posting your stupidity over and over just makes you more stupid and less credible, and guess what. Hillary is suffering in part because of that, in part because she just can't tell the truth, and in part because she has a plethora of wealth no one knew about.

  • Posted By: jervis @ 04/08/2008 9:35:49 AM

    Comment: larryb is a moron who doesn't know what he is talking about. Read the article again and you'll see Obama's green rating is higher than Clinton's. She's a lying piece o garbage. They just came out with that BS Health care story she's been telling at every campaign stop. She has to stop telling it because she was twisting it up so much. Can't believe anything she says, just like Billy boy. Like Obama's campaign will soon start saying, and this is all they should have to say, "If Clinton can't even run a successful campaign now, how will she in the general election?" Enough said

  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/08/2008 7:08:13 AM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for himself and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin carbon taxed formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are pretty good odds.

  • Posted By: larryb @ 04/08/2008 4:44:24 AM

    Comment: Basically Obama is for whatever gets and keeps the kid's vote first and avoids anything that might lose him the dedicated support of his base, the black vote...although there is no way he will lose that. but he tends to generalize so no one can get mad at him for anything and keep the pep rally going with the kids.

    Clinton likes the "green jobs" which is great since those jobs have to be done here, but I think she is a bit over-optimistic on the actual number of jobs that can be made, but hey cut her estimate in half and it cold help a lot.

    McLane is clueless but at least doesn't try to rabble rouse the kids and is honest about being cluless.

  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/07/2008 9:47:56 PM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for himself and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin carbon taxed formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are pretty good odds.

  • Posted By: Shtuey @ 04/07/2008 7:59:10 PM

    Comment: If you give a damn about the environment there is only one choice; VOTE FOR HILLARY! Let's not even discuss McCain. There's no such thing as a Republican who's not in bed with the Arabs. The reason McCain is so vocal about the spread of redical Islam is because of its effects on the oil market; conflict allows the oil companies to drive up the prices and drain our wallets. Obama's genius plan is to build more nuclear reactors. Who wants one of those in their backyard? Didn't think so. Did you know that one of Obama's biggest corporate contributors is Excelon? That's the largest operator of nuclear power plants in the country.
    Obama loves their money (and lobbyist and pac money too!)
    http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/22/681/
    Hillary is the only candidate that understands that oil independence, climate change, the green economy, and national security are one issue. She has the plans to make it work, and the vision to carry it out.

    www.hillaryclinton.com

  • Posted By: dwighth @ 04/07/2008 6:52:06 PM

    Comment: josh62 you are a real active propoganda machine, are you Russian or Chinese. You are the only one that seems to find these info.

  • Posted By: josh62 @ 04/07/2008 5:36:39 PM

    Comment: Judicial Watch:
    By Klaus Marre-Obama ???intended to leave no paper trail??? OBAMA REFUSES to cooperate in releasing 8 years of his state senate records. One main reason REZKO!

    Politico reports, ???During his first run for elected office, Barack Obama played a greater role than he acknowledges in crafting liberal stands on gun control, the death penalty and abortion??? positions that appear at odds with the more moderate image he???s projected during his presidential campaign. The evidence comes from an amended version of an Illinois voter group???s detailed questionnaire, filed under his name during his bid for a state Senate. In response to a Politico story, Obama???s answers he never saw questioaire?

    NBC- Aswini Anburajan
    OBAMA LIES IN PENNSYLVANIA AD
    It's unfortunate that Senator Obama is using false advertising to explain why he can be trusted to do something about energy prices. In his ad, Obama says, I'm Barack Obama, and I don't take money from oil companies or lobbyists, and I won't let them block change any more. Obama has been the recipient of more than $220,000 from the oil and gas industry just since as of Feb/08. Two of Obama's campaign bundlers are also CEOs for oil and gas companies, per his campaign Web site? Obama needs to answer to VOTERS about his dealings with one of his largest contributors Exelon, a big nuclear power company that he cut deals behind closed doors protecting them from full disclosure in the nuclear industry. Exxon, Shell, and others are among his biggest donors


    Obama said he goofed on votes angered fellow Democrats in the Senate when he voted to strip millions of dollars from a child welfare office on Chicago's West Side. But Obama had a ready explanation: He goofed! Also announced he had fumbled an election-reform vote the day before, on a measure that passed 51 to 6. The next day, he acknowledged voting "present" on a key telecommunications vote. He stood on March 11, 1999, to take back his vote against legislation to end good-behavior credits for certain felons in county jails. "I pressed the wrong button on that," he said. Obama was the lone dissenter on Feb. 24, 2000, against 57 yeas for a ban on human cloning. "I pressed the wrong button by accident," he said. But two of Obama's bumbles came on more-sensitive topics, he backed legislation to permit riverboat casinos to operate even when the boats were dockside. The measure, pushed by the gambling industry and fought by church groups whose support Obama was seeking, passed with two "yeas" to spare -- including Obama's. Moments after its passage he rose to say, explaining that he had mistakenly voted for it.

  • Posted By: josh62 @ 04/07/2008 5:36:26 PM

    Comment: **The Conservative Times: Exclusive: Obama Connection to Terrorists Revealed
    March 22, 2008 by Jim Kouri, CPP vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police. http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/31408.html

    **al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden is praying for an Obama victory because it would help the militants win in Iraq**

    OBAMA LIES AGAIN AND MAINSTREAM MEDIA LIKE CNN HIDES IT!

    Sen. Obama referres to himself as 'a constitutional law professor on the campaign trail. TRUTH: He never held any such title! Obama changed website bio to reflect that he was a 'lecturer' rather than 'professor. Chicago Daily Herald

    Obama gets 4 Pinocchio???s for 100 Years War-Wondered why the national media won???t call out Obama for his serial distortions on McCain???s Iraq comments, the Globe tried to help Obama rationalize it. Michael Dobbs scolded Obama in today???s Fact Checker


    MSNBC-OBAMA: ANOTHER SUPER, EXAGGERATION
    Washington Post caught Obama in a lie about the Kennedy family role.
    The WashigntonPost Fact Check- Senator Obama CAUGHT LYING about Kennedy Role in Helping His Father Contrary to Obama's claims in speeches Kennedy family did not provide the funding for a September 1959 airlift of 81 Kenyan students to the United States that included Obama's father. According to historical records and interviews with participants, the Kennedys were approached for support for the program a year later, July 1960. family responded with a $100,000 donation, which went to pay for a second airlift in September 1960.

  • Posted By: rodmar2 @ 04/07/2008 5:02:07 PM

    Comment: The canditates should answer these quetions dirrectly.

    Is global warming man made?
    Are you absolutely sure that an ???An Inconvenient Truth??? is scientifically accurate?
    Have you read any of the opposing views to ???An Inconvenient Truth????
    Should I make someone else wealthy buying carbon credits?
    If we are going to be forced to buy carbon credits, should the Federal government handle the purchases and eliminate the middle man?
    Are Carbon credits taxes?
    Will signing the Kyoto agreement cripple our economy?
    Are the Kyoto agreement rules applied equally for all countries?
    Has China signed The Kyoto Agreement?
    Has India signed The Kyoto Agreement?
    Did you believe a new ice age was coming as scientists put forth in the 70???s?
    Will you require government studies as to the validity Global warming data before we enact any legislation?

    We should use all forms of energy production available to us, while the private sector comes up with renewable alternatives.

  • Posted By: Larry Kegel @ 04/07/2008 3:36:27 PM

    Comment: The only ting President Bush cares about is the Oil he can sell... Gore is the leader in environment... Hillary Clinton is the next best Person that has been fighting for it... Obama only started talking about it after Gore quit running... McCain is all talk like Bush and will do completely opposite of everything He says like Bush did... Obama thinks He be able to do everything that he says... But so did Schwortnator and he never did anything!!! Hillary is a doer not just a talker!!!

  • Posted By: dwighth @ 04/07/2008 3:19:14 PM

    Comment: kmcflash, you say you are intelligent but unfortunately the way you compose your views and ideas are at the least biased, and bigoted. If George Bush as dumb and inexperienced as he was can win the White House TWICE, then anyone including your clueless self with support can.
    You also commented that he jumped the line, ae you saying that we have to wait our turn if we want to be a President? If so, who is the gate keeper that tells us when we are ready? You? The Elites of Washington? The troubling point to what you say is that the premise that our childen, and our children children can be President, may not be true because it comes with stipulations. Don't believe the crap about Experience vs. InExperience as a Qualification for being President, because the only Experienced person to become President is a PAST President. The only true pre-requisite for being a President is the ability to LEAD. A good CEO surrounds him or herself with GREAT people, his role is to take that team of great people and make them successful.

    I served my COUNTRY for 17 years+ and every now and again I have to remind myself why I served, I did it for "WE THE PEOPLE". Nothing else in this world matters but the PEOPLE.

  • Posted By: jjahns @ 04/07/2008 1:23:28 PM

    Comment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw&feature=related

    And Rezko was bad? Oh but wait, that theory was debunked. GG...

  • Posted By: coolkid.02 @ 04/07/2008 1:08:43 PM

    Comment: I don't get how people don't think global warming is not happening. The Ice caps are melting! I don't see how having cars with better gas milage, seperating our trash from recycling, using CFL's is a bad thing. Most of these things will save you money. I think that people are crazy to think that this is a conspiracy.

    If global warming is a consiracy, it has to benifit someone. I just don't see who that is.

  • Posted By: ralmu @ 04/07/2008 12:25:03 PM

    Comment: I am wholeheartedly for ecological accountability. But, I am not paranoid about the issues under discussion. We need a pragmatic approach, rather than political correctness, or campaign-driven promises. If indeed we know the facts (and I wonder how much the general public really knows), then we must act on what can possibly be accomplished right away, and devise a realistic plan to tackle the problem in the ensuing years. On the other hand, I believe that the most important factor is political will; not only in the United States, but also in the rest of the world. This is not an American problem, it is a world problem that demands a world solution. For that reason, the fixation on a particular candidate in this campaign is inappropriate.

  • Posted By: Cantabrigian @ 04/07/2008 10:47:54 AM

    Comment: Obama has a job equal to Sisyphus if he attempts to stress his patriotism. Obama is adamantly refusing to allow the ballots of Michigan and Florida voters. Obama was and still is, trying the same shenanigans with Senator Hillary Clinton that he used to win his Senate seat. Obama went to court and challenged the legitimacy of every signature of his competitors, and eventually the contenders were removed from the ballot! Then there is Michelle Obama, a very angry woman who expresses anti-American sentiments that, "life in America is not good, we're a country that is just down right mean . . . We're a country that is guided by fear, We're a nation of cynics, sloths and complacents." Mrs. Obama comes from a black blue-collar family, attended both Princeton and Harvard, is now making a six-figure income and living in a $1.6 million home. This is the couple we ought to put in the White House! I don't think so.

    • Posted By: jjahns @ 04/07/2008 13:04:40

      Comment: Oh yeah? Well, you should probably think about this.

      October, last year, HRC signed a document stating she WOULD NOT campaign in Michigan or Florida because they violated the rules. The people did not, but the politicians in those states DID.

      Yet, she was the only candidate who campaigned in them. This is verified by her sighting at a rally in Floriday 3 days before the primary.

      Hypocrite. Get all the facts straight if you're going to bash. Next!

      • Posted By: aintwegotfun @ 04/07/2008 14:21:56

        Comment: Dumb, dumb, none of the candidates campaigned in Florida or Michigan with the exception of O'Bama. His "National ad" ran iin Florida for a fact, don't know if it ran in Michigan. Everyone knows that!

        • Posted By: jjahns @ 04/07/2008 14:54:26

          Comment: Go look it up. Jan 28 I believe. Confirmed that HRC was in Florida prior to the primary.

          • Posted By: jervis @ 04/08/2008 09:40:16

            Comment: Correct Hillary was the only one campaigning there. Plus in MI Obama wasn't even on the ticket so of course she wants a recount, because she won. It doesn't matter, Clinton would still be behind if she got most of the delegates in those 2 anyway. She's picking for the needle in the haystack, and the haystack that is Obama keeps getting bigger. I wish she would just give it up, like half her campaign people have.

  • Posted By: Cantabrigian @ 04/07/2008 10:42:29 AM

    Comment: Getzel ~ too funny, nothing much to add, except, Obama ain't green!

    • Posted By: getzel @ 04/07/2008 21:47:14

      Comment: WELL, I think his lack of experience leaves him green.

      Research indicates there are 3, maybe 4 if you include congressmen, specific types of people that support Barrack Hussein Obumer.

      1. Hate themselves, and of course proclaim it is others that hate.

      2. Hate others, and of course proclaim it is others that hate.

      3. Most prevalent group: UDOPIANS: Characterized by bizarre manifestations of HOPE and CHANGE according to each individuals individual fantasy of utopia. UDOPIANS have the same side effects, not unlike alcoholics or drug addicts, they are in denial as to reality: that HOPE and CHANGE mean nothing; and yet those with UDOPIA feel HOPE & CHANGE means whatever they fanaticize it means. Each has the same basic politically correct response to those who try and point out they have UDOPIAN simplex: you are a neo-con or you hate or other similar politically correct accusations of the day. Someone points out: OBUMER you have UDOPIAN simplex: I see all the red flags of UDOPIA; same delusional HOPE for CHANGE answer every time.

      4. Congressmen, & their workers, who think Obumer is their: 4 more years of pork barrel: free meal ticket for their districts; no leadership with a clue to control congressional out of control spending.= easy re-election.

      One presidential candidate uses the Karl Marx play book: Workers united for HOPE & CHANGE. When the Bullshivicis took over Russia in1917 they used the same propaganda as Barak Hussain Obumer: Workers united for HOPE & CHANGE.

      OBUMER; CONTENT OF CHARACTER, no, CHARACTER, NO CONTENT!?

      Intelligence analyst. Getzel

      Until now I always thought Obama was a fool who had his judgment colored by race, now he has proved it. He could not even figure out to leave the Rev. Wight church: bad decision maker.

      You can fool some of the people all of the time and most American blacks all of the time and for Obama those are pretty good odds.

      One presidential candidate uses the Karl Marx play book: Workers united for HOPE & CHANGE. When the Bullshivicis took over Russia in1917 they used the same propaganda as Barak Hussain Obumer: Workers united for HOPE & CHANGE.

      Changed his name from Barry to Barack trying to get a non white Moslem identity. Yes he did.

  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/07/2008 6:59:23 AM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for himself and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin carbon taxed formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are pretty good odds.

  • Posted By: thegoldenstars @ 04/07/2008 4:25:50 AM

    Comment: OBAMA SAYS HE'LL PULL ALL THE US TROOPS OUT OF IRAQ AS SOON AS POSSIBLE IF HE BECOMES THE PRESIDENT, THE US WILL LOSE IRAQ TO IRANIANS SOON, USA IS THE ONLY SUPER POWER WHICH IS THE ONLY SUPER LOSER, LOSER LOSER USA IS A LOSER.

  • Posted By: thegoldenstars @ 04/07/2008 4:16:23 AM

    Comment: THE AMERICAN SOLDIERS HAVE BRUTALLY MASSACRED IRAQI INNOCENT WOMEN AND CHILDREN.

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 04/07/2008 12:22:35 AM

    Comment: McCain is running on a misguided 100 year agenda. McCain does not understand economics, and cannot provide the solutions this countrY so desperatelY needs.
    McCain is a Maverick. He wants to be a War time president. This is a FACT.
    He wants VictorY in Iraq but cannot define what clear victorY is. So he has set a one hundred Year timeline for VictorY that will drain our TreasurY. Lower taxes and spend the taxes we have left on Iraq.

    We have to let Iraqi's run their own country . Our troops presence causes tensions in the Middle East. We have enough troops around the world. We cannot afford to keep our troops in IRAQ TOO. We have to force a political solution in Iraq, no matter how difficult and get the hell out of there. This cannot go on forever. NATO is expanding. We should include Iraq in NATO and encourage international forces to solve conflicts inside the MIDDLE EAST, instead of us. Our unilateral attitude has cost us full international support as well as a lot of tax paYer money.

    Rule #1: SHOW ME THE MONEY and I WILL LEAD YOU TO VICTORY. EDDIEWHERE © 2008

    OBAMA WILL BE THE NEXT president of the UNITED STATES. yOU CAN FEEL IT and I CAN pROVE IT WITH ONE SIMpLE FACT. IN AMERICA money is GOD. OBAMA raised forty million in MARCH and an unprecedented fifty five million in FEBRUARy. THE DNC IS RICH. NO ONE CAN ARGUE WITH THis FACT, not EVEN KARL ROVE. BUSH understands this principle.
    WHAT MAKES THIS FACT SO impressive is that this money is from millions of small donors. NOW THAT IS power. IT is a force that cannot be stopped. THIS MOVEMENT is getting stronger and stronger.
    THE SUpERDELEGATES have tilted in OBAMA's FAVOR. HILLARy cannot counter the fact that OBAMA will raise unprecedented amounts of money for the DNC. OBAMA has RAISED so much money that HE CAN START HIS OWN pARTy, THE DEMOCRATIC pARty OF CHANGE. Hillary DOES NOT HAVE THE MONEy TO RUN as an INDEpENDENT. IF i were in the OBAMA CORNER I WOULD LET THE SUpERDELEGATES know this. IT IS OVER for HILLARy. IT is unfortunate because HILLARy and her consultants underestmated their opponent.
    Champions often GET KNOCKED OUT WHEN THEy DO THIS. JUST ASK THE NEW ENGLAND patriots

    OBAMA WILL WIN THE NATIONAL ELECTION by a large number. McCain has no chance. HIS one hundred year war agenda for the country will not solve our economic challenges and will further divide this GREAT country.

    • Posted By: Shtuey @ 04/07/2008 20:02:46

      Comment: I hate to tell you this, but if Obama is the nominee all the money in the world won't get him elected. He can't win Florida, Michigan, Ohio, and polls behind McCain in PA. NJ is also in play for McCain against Obama. And if you think that the Republican 527s aren't going to Swiftboat Obama with Jeremiah Wright in every white county in this country then you are living in a dream land. Obama has already lost the general election, you, like your candidate, just hasn't figured it out yet. You want a Democrat in the White House? Vote for Clinton!

    • Posted By: thegoldenstars @ 04/07/2008 05:10:29

      Comment: EDDIEWHERE, YOU DON'T HAVE CONFIDENCE THE USA WILL WIN THE WAR IN IRAQ AND YOU HAVE TO RUN AWAY FROM IRAN? WHICH INTERNATIONAL FORCE WANTS TO GO TO IRAQ? THERE IS NONE EXCEPT IRAN. ARE YOU GOING TO GIVE IRAQ TO IRAN? THERE ARE A LOT OF OIL IN IRAQ, DON'T YOU WANT TO KEEP IT? DON'T YOU FEEL HUNGRY FOR OIL?

  • Posted By: getzel @ 04/06/2008 11:05:39 PM

    Comment: Those green with envy of those who have acquired much green and who themselves are not green when it comes to con jobs have set out to exploit the green grain of truth in matters pertaining to greening the environment. Even our Absolut friends who come in search of green-go cards recognize that like the greengo, he is in constant pursuit of much green, some for himself and some for those back where the grass is not greener. When your green-goes into thin carbon taxed formerly air filled pockets of the not so green green-gos, you will really long for greener pastures.

    Intelligence analyst: Getzel

    You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are pretty good odds.

  • Posted By: ARBOR @ 04/06/2008 10:50:31 PM

    Comment: global warming is a myth.

  • Posted By: expatincebu @ 04/06/2008 10:49:17 PM

    Comment: America must change and it will not. Global warming is the result of suburban sprawl consumerism in the west and overpopulation in the third world. Until Americans are ready to live differently nothing will change. Eventually the end of cheap energy will end the "American" lifestyle. The question is has that end come soon enough to save humanity.

  • Posted By: ayeaga @ 04/06/2008 8:30:57 PM

    Comment: Herfan,
    You keep talking of former President Clinton as if he is running for President. Who actually is running? If you vote for Hillary based on what her husband did several years ago, you are mistaken and your logic is not sound. The American constitution, which is the operating document for this country does not have "co-
    presidency" written in it.
    Also, the economic environment of the 90's is completely different from the 08's. His little stimulus package of 90's may not work in the 08's unless you want to gamble with your future. Remember, Bush has also given a stimulus package. If that is your expectation, then wait for Bush's plan to work and lets make a pass on the economy. I am sure you wouldn't want that because the problem is too serious.

  • Posted By: Cantabrigian @ 04/06/2008 8:06:55 PM

    Comment: Someone with a pile of $$$$ wants Obama to win and it is certainly not the students and the black community who are ponying up Obama's big dollars. Get Smart Democratic Party faithful and follow the money . . . what is going on here?

    • Posted By: sstansbe @ 04/06/2008 21:21:18

      Comment: What's going on here is donations from 1.3 million regular citizens. What's going on is Obama was forward thinking enough to make effective use of the web as a fundraising tool. What's going on is that Obama has more educated supporters than Clinton, and those with more education tend to have more disposable income. What's going on is that your comment makes you sound like a paranoid jackass.

      • Posted By: aintwegotfun @ 04/07/2008 14:31:41

        Comment: Those with more disposable income do not necessarily want a whole lot of change, so what does that say? If you think this country can get by on white collar workers alone, think again! Apparently they beleive that Hillary would help those less fortunate more than O'Bama.

      • Posted By: kmcflash @ 04/07/2008 14:27:07

        Comment: Obama cannot win the general election, but with so many buying into "just believe" and financing
        the rolling out of a candidate who cannot win, whats going on is the decimation of the Democratic
        party. Obam jumped ther line and in doing so became the most divisive force in the country... he
        cannot unite the party, the voters, or the country. If he was smart, he would have brokered a deal, taken time to 'self-wipe' (rather than be outted) and shed the problems that will prevent him from heading
        America...he could then have bwecome relevant enough to win a future general election, instead
        of wasting his shot (and the party's) going headlong into defeat. What has been accomplished
        in insisting on a candidate who cannot withstand vetting ? Pep rallies for the oh-so-intelligent is
        intellectual ? When Mr.Obama finished blowing it for the party, for himslf, and for you, what will you say then... "I am still smarter than the average American, but my fellow Americans were so dumb they
        didn't know enough to fvote for our guy ?'

  • Posted By: luvs2000 @ 04/06/2008 6:32:40 PM

    Comment: After reading the rambling, incoherent babble posted by herfan, it's obvious which one is the true idiot.

  • Posted By: herfan @ 04/06/2008 5:04:04 PM

    Comment: YOU MIGHT BE AN IDIOT:-)

    If you think Barack Obama with little or no experience would be better than Hillary Clinton with 35 years experience.

    You Might Be An Idiot!

    If you think that Obama with no experience can fix an economy on the verge of collapse better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) led the greatest economic expansion, and prosperity in American history.

    You Might Be An Idiot!

    If you think that Obama with no experience fighting for universal health care can get it for you better than Hillary Clinton. Who anticipated this current health care crisis back in 1993, and fought a pitched battle against overwhelming odds to get universal health care for all the American people.

    You Might Be An Idiot!

    If you think that Obama with no experience can manage, and get us out of two wars better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) went to war only when he was convinced that he absolutely had to. Then completed the mission in record time against a nuclear power. AND DID NOT LOSE THE LIFE OF A SINGLE AMERICAN SOLDIER. NOT ONE!

    You Might Be An Idiot!

    If you think that Obama with no experience saving the environment is better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) left office with the greatest amount of environmental cleanup, and protections in American history.

    You Might Be An Idiot!

    If you think that Obama with little or no education experience is better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) made higher education affordable for every American. And created higher job demand and starting salary???s than they had ever been before or since.

    You Might Be An Idiot!

    If you think that Obama with no experience will be better than Hillary Clinton who spent 8 years at the right hand of President Bill Clinton. Who is already on record as one of the greatest Presidents in American history.

    You Might Be An Idiot!

    If you think that you can change the way Washington works with pretty speeches from Obama, rather than with the experience, and political expertise of two master politicians ON YOUR SIDE like Hillary and Bill Clinton..

    You Might Be An Idiot!

    If you think all those Republicans voting for Obama in the Democratic primaries, and caucuses are doing so because they think he is a stronger Democratic candidate than Hillary Clinton. :-)

    Best regards

    jacksmith...

    p.s. You Might Be An Idiot!

    If you don't know that the huge amounts of money funding the Obama campaign to defeat Hillary Clinton is coming in from the insurance, and medical industry, that has been ripping you off, and killing you and your children. And denying you, and your loved ones the life saving medical care you needed. All just so they can make more huge immoral profits for them-selves off of your suffering...

    • Posted By: Opinionated1 @ 04/08/2008 16:40:21

      Comment: RIGHT ON HER FAN.....HILLARY 08 !!!!!! i've been saying that all along.....

    • Posted By: jjahns @ 04/07/2008 13:07:11

      Comment: Clearly you're being paid. This is the 4th site I've seen you on...
      How much are you getting by HRC?

  • Posted By: Thevail @ 04/06/2008 3:24:18 PM

    Comment: Generally, all the things that are reccomended to "save the plane" also save you money. Better fuel efficiency, means you have to pay for less gas. CFL bulbs that use a fraction of the electricity lower your power bill every month. Wind power that doesn't create tons of carbon emissions also don't rquire tons of coal transported across America's roadways meaning less traffic congestion, shorter commute times, etc. Carpooling saves everyone money and parking spaces.

    My dad and I agree on most "green" issues. Me because I'm a tree-hugger, him because he's cheap!

  • Posted By: Texas Jake @ 04/06/2008 10:06:37 AM

    Comment: People can debate whether Global Warming is a hoax or not. The 2006 Farmers Alamanac reported record highs, and record lows, like it has every year. And, naive idealists still feel their vote matters, so we need a green candidate. The most disgusting place on Earth is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch! Hey, lets all fight something real. Twice the size of Texas, and made up of plastic goo. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_Garbage_Patch

  • Posted By: Fabalega @ 04/06/2008 1:38:02 AM

    Comment: If America comtinues to be duped by this "Hoax", it deserves whatever chaos that ensues. Not one of the presidential candidates have shown any leadership on this issue. The war in Iraq and " GoreBull Warming" are best left to experts and not politicians. All three qualify as politicians , but not as leaders...L.Stephens, Ontario,Ca.

    • Posted By: edkollin @ 04/06/2008 12:51:41

      Comment: I am glad somebody has picked up on . the similarities of the scaremongering tactics used with Iraq and Global Warming. You can add all the lawsuits and political correctness also. Today this country is all about zero sum game either you are with Air America or Rush and the other side is always wrong . Liberals like to claim they are smarter then the rest of us and I used to doubt them but they have learned from from Karl Rove really well. What is lost in all of this is only the basic values this country was founded on that is do not trust government ,independence freedom of choice and individualism. As a voter it angers me that I have no candidate representing my point of view on the Global Warming issue and other issues also.

      • Posted By: sstansbe @ 04/06/2008 21:24:20

        Comment: You have no candidate representing your views on global warming because all the candidates have an IQ over 60.

  • Posted By: HigherMinds @ 04/06/2008 1:07:21 AM

    Comment: This article could have mentioned that one of the primary goals of the Clinton Foundation is to work globally with leaders around the world to more effectively to solve the global warming crisis.

  • Posted By: Bobbb @ 04/05/2008 10:42:53 PM

    Comment: Fear. The end of life because of rising temperatures. What ever happened to the ozone layer holes that was going to destroy the world??? Oh yeah... they all closed up didn't they. Bummer - next to cry about should be = Global Warming!!! The end of life because of GLOBAL WARMING - only the temp hasn't risen since 98 and this year the temp is gonna drop a little.... hmmmmm. I know - don't confuse the issue with facts. First we faced certain death from ozone depletion... then global warming... and how much money is Gore making off this global warming scare. It must be the scare decade --- scare the world into believing Iraq has weapons of mass destruction... scare the world into believing the enviornment is falling apart.... scare the american people into believing in buildins a Berlin Wall between the US and Mexico. Go figure. Have a nice night all. Sweet dreams and be safe. :-)

    • Posted By: Fabalega @ 04/06/2008 01:43:35

      Comment: Welcome to the world of scaremongering. The left has used this tactic for years to get control of public policy. The question that I have is; We , as mankind, have been doing essentially the same things all through the industrial age , and we have experienced both warming and cooling. How can we produce two different outcomes from the same behavior? Your comments are right on target.

      • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 04/06/2008 22:15:49

        Comment: Bush has acknowledged that global warming is real and is a threat. Several retired military leaders have also acknowledged this and that it could be a serious threat to our national security.http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/apr2007/2007-04-16-05.asp Does that sound like leftist scaremongering to you? And we are not producing two different outcomes, the earth has been getting warmer and is continuing to do so. The polar ice caps are obviously melting and still people deny that it's happening. I'm just thankful that people like you don't represent the majority of people intelligent enough to work on this problem. Otherwise I'd have no hope at all.

        • Posted By: aintwegotfun @ 04/07/2008 14:46:14

          Comment: I beleive that global warming is real, but nontheless, the solutions for this problem can only be a win-win situation. Nothing wrong with less polution of our earth, water & air. These things do create health problems. Nothing wrong with becoming less dependent on oil from countries that would like nothing better than to see the demise of our society.

 
 
Reply
Cancel
 
 
Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

Cancel
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Harmonix, creator of Rock Band and Guitar Hero, is changing videogames.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
CAMPAIGN 2008
republican gop convention periscope mccain

John McCain's choice to manage the GOP convention this summer is lobbyist Doug Goodyear, whose firm once represented Burma's repressive regime.

Sponsored by