FOOD

'On the Edge of a Catastrophe'

As prices of corn, wheat and rice rise around the world, poor nations are facing hunger of a vast scale.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

A crisis is looming: grain prices reach new records, governments around the world ban their food exports to ease domestic riots and the number of hungry people grows dramatically. To learn more about the underlining causes of a possible food crisis, which countries might be affected and what governments can do to alleviate the situation, NEWSWEEK's Ana Elena Azpurua talked with Lester Brown, founder and president of the Earth Policy Institute, based in Washington. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: Are we on the verge of a food catastrophe?
Lester Brown:
It depends on how you define it. The number of hungry people in the world is rising very rapidly. We don't know exactly how much because it takes a year or two before all the data is collected and compiled by [the United Nation's Food and Agriculture Organization] in Rome, but we are looking at an enormous increase in hunger and potential starvation in the months ahead. We might be on the edge of a catastrophe. The new harvest is still some months away and we are already having riots and fights. My concern is that this could increase the number of failing states in the world, creating even more instability.

Why are we feeling a food shortage now?
There are a number of forces that work on the demand side. We are adding 70 million people a year. There are three or four billion who want to move up the food chain. They want to consume more milk, eggs, meat. On the supply side, water scarcities are spreading in many countries, especially in China, India and Pakistan but also in countries in the Middle East and North Africa. And then the big thing, of course, is the enormous diversion of grain into ethanol distilleries in the United States. In fact, the growth this year in the grain going into ethanol distilleries in the United States exceeds the worldwide growth in demand for grain for food and feed.

What countries or regions will be more affected by a food crisis?
It would be those low and middle-income countries that import a substantial part of their grain supply. This includes the two most populous countries in the world: India and China. Pakistan, being another very large country, might also be affected. Certainly, countries across North of Africa [will be affected], from Morocco to Egypt, because they all import a substantial share of their grain supply. Iraq and Afghanistan will also feel the crisis.

Could we say that India and China will be on the top of the list?
They will be affected, in the sense that they are the most populous countries and food prices have risen dramatically in both, creating a certain amount of social unrest. Other, small countries spread around Africa, particularly those that are heavily depending on food aid, will be very directly affected because the rise of commodity prices of grain effectively reduces the budgets of the world food programs—USAID's budget for example. A lot of people are going to be forced to tighten their belts when they don't have any notches left. The people who will be most affected are those who are on the lower rungs of the global economic ladder. These are people who even before this doubling of wheat, corn and rice prices were just sort of hanging on there by their fingertips. Now many of them will lose their grip and began to fall off.

Will the United States feel the crisis?
Not nearly as much as low-income countries, because if you buy a loaf of bread in the U.S. for three dollars, the value of the wheat in that bread may only be 30 cents. Therefore, if the price of wheat doubles then the price of bread goes from $3 to $3.30, which is only a 10 percent increase.  If you live in India or Pakistan and you buy wheat as wheat and the price doubles, the cost to your food doubles.

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: smokey_joe @ 04/18/2008 4:59:01 PM

    Comment: Another fuel technology that does not contribute to higher food prices is the use of green algae to convert carbon dioxide coming from the smokestacks of power plants and industrial factories into oxygen. As a by-product, the algae reproduce enormously and the harvested excess algae can be used to produce fertilizer, biodiesel, ethanol, cattle feed or food additives for humans. This solves several problems at once with no downside. Why aren't governments around the world rushing to implement green algae as an environmental and fuel solution that won't raise food prices? Is it because the technology is too simple???

  • Posted By: mohd sheikh @ 04/15/2008 5:34:41 PM

    Comment: Comments for News week

    In Pakistan and Thailand, troops have been deployed to avoid seizing of food from fields and warehouses. Though billions of dollars is being spent on purchasing and selling bombs and guns instead of agricultural development.

    Pakistan is a big food producer but it has been very badly managed. There are big black marketers who make profits over such type of news and above all 90 % of the newly elected members of assemblies are rich landlords. The Prime Minister after resuming his office passed first order by increasing the wheat price for purchasing the new wheat crop.

    The UN was established to maintain peace, security and welfare of citizens of all of its member states. People are going to bed hungry but the member states are spending billions of dollars on buying and selling ammunition or killing machines.

    Mohamed El-Baradei is one of the most important men of the United Nation organization. He is Director General International Atomic Energy Agency. He delivered a speech at the 44th Munich Conference about the successes of the United Nation in achieving its prime objectives in the following phrases:

    Is the world in disarray and unfortunately my answer is yes. The world is in disarray. The world is going through a period of insecurity both at the individual level and at the state level. I think we all agree on that.

    I will just give you a few figures. We still live in a world where we have two billion people who live under 2 US Dollars a day; one third of our fellow human beings. We have 850 million people who go to bed hungry every day.

    James Morris used to run the World Food Program, [he] told me that if he would get one percent on what we spent on our armaments a year nobody would go to bed hungry.

    We have 20 thousand people who die every day because they are too poor to live. Sanctity of human life; are we serious about the sanctity of human life?

    Cannot we spend 1% out the money we spent on dealing armaments.

  • Posted By: Netra Maithun @ 04/15/2008 6:21:54 AM

    Comment: The Third world is facing a crisis situation. Unlike developed country, where food cost is less than 5% of a household income, in third world county food cost is more than 50% of household income. And a sudden spurt of food price is / will lead to starvation. For a developed nation, in human terms this cost is not much. However, in the third world, it is a matter of life and death. The OPEC cartel and the increasing crude price, which has increased more than 3 time in as many years is responsible. And unfortunately, the huge wealth from Crude is creating only a few fat cats. The world needs to re-look at food and energy security. In the last few years the two key issues got conjoined. I feel this situation is not a freak outcome but has been simmering around for some time and would continue to harass us hereafter.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL SECURITY
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu