The greedy commercial fishing indusries and other marauders have massacred too many fish species in addition to decimating marine ecosystems and biodiversity. Millions of non-targeted fish have been killed and tossed back into the seas. Overfishing has also had a deadly impact on marine mammals and birds that thrive in aquatic environs. Fishing should be halted.
Endangered
Oregon's salmon-fishing industry seemed poised to recover—until now.
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
College didn't take, and logging threatened to kill him, so Jared Reeves followed in his father's wake and climbed aboard a salmon troller in 2005, lured by the prospect of a six-figure income in a single summer out on the Pacific Ocean.
Any fishing industry is subject to boom-and-bust cycles, Reeves knew. He'd grown up watching the collapse of groundfish stocks on the West Coast, and the weather can pin down a fleet for much of a season. But things looked good for the wild salmon business. Federal fishery managers had seemed to discover the right formula for how much to let trollers catch, ensuring that the population wasn't decimated by an overzealous fleet, and the buying public had grown increasingly willing to pay high prices for wild fish, thanks to mounting concerns about the health risks and poor quality of the farmed, imported salmon that dominates chain-supermarket shelves across the country.
Reeves's enthusiasm was quickly drenched. The Interior Department's 2002 decision to resume using water out of the Klamath River to irrigate parched farms in eastern Oregon led to a collapse of the critical ChinooK salmon spawning grounds the same year Reeves joined the fleet, killing more than 30,000 fish. Forced by law to maintain a predetermined "floor" of salmon in the ocean, federal regulators had little choice but to impose limitations on what the 1,200-member West Coast commercial fleet could catch, robbing salmon trollers of their ability to capitalize on the newfound demand for wild seafood.
This was supposed to be the season where the fleet bounced back. Returns of spawning fish on the Klamath have finally started to recover. Demand and prices for fat, wriggling Chinook salmon are still soaring--people pay as much as $20 per pound at markets across the United States--and a troller can earn up to $100 for a single fish.
Why, then, did the Pacific Fishery Management Council vote last week in favor of the most restricted season in the West Coast salmon fleet's history?
The answer lies in another river system: the Sacramento, which winds its way from Mount Shasta, 382 miles through California's Central Valley, before dumping into the San Francisco Bay. Large enough to accommodate oceangoing vessels as far inland as the Golden State's capital, the Sacramento is the West Coast's most important source of Chinook salmon. And for reasons nobody is really sure about, the Sacramento's salmon stocks have collapsed. Salmon returning to spawn dropped to 90,000 last year from a steady average of about 475,000.
Scientists blame changing ocean conditions, but frustrated salmon farmers cite a host of other factors: There's water diverted to farmland on the Sacramento as well as the Klamath; brazen, federally protected sea lions and terns munching on young fish as they flop across fish ladders; dams that hamper the salmon's ability to travel; Chinook ripped out of the ocean incidentally by the mammoth boats that make up the whiting fleet. In short, any number of factors could influence the fate of Chinook salmon—none of which involve trollers hauling in too many fish, regulators are quick to admit.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »










Discuss