CAMPAIGN 2008

A Political Rerun

The 21st Obama-Clinton debate was just more of the same.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that after more than 20 debates between the leading Democrats, both candidates are exhausted and have exhausted every conceivable debate question. That the debate format is itself a televised form of tyranny that has crushed the imagination of political junkies and TV producers across the nation.

So it was in Philadelphia for the 21st debate of this nomination contest, where Pennsylvania's voters have surely earned the right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness after five weeks of endless political ads and candidates on bus tours.

How exhausted is the debate format? ABC's producers were so desperate for new ideas they resorted to quoting sections of the Constitution after every commercial break. (The first ad break came only three minutes into the debate, suggesting that ABC was more interested in generating revenue than reviving interest in the founding clauses of the nation.)

The candidates quickly got down to business. Barack Obama needed to address his comments about the bitterness felt in small-town America, which he did in his opening remarks, saying the country was both decent and frustrated. Hillary Clinton needed to keep the small-town flap alive, so—a few minutes later—she talked about a country that was both positive and frustrated. In its third century of existence, a frustrated America is still engaged in the pursuit of happiness.

When faced with their first real question, neither candidate wanted to answer—a rare moment of silence that revealed more about the relationship between the two senators than did 90 minutes of predictable "gotcha" questions and telegraphed swipes between the candidates.

Why not take one another for veep, in line with the suggestion by Mario Cuomo, asked moderator Charlie Gibson? Both candidates stared out at the audience with forced smiles. "Don't all speak at once," Gibson quipped.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Jrmapu @ 04/23/2008 10:17:51 AM

    I don't disagree completely with you but I still don't trust Obama. Not all republicans are supportive of Obama. They don't want Hillary because she is a stronger adversary than Obama. He has too many secrets and skeletons that makes him a liability not a credit. Plus he could not win the states which win the White House. She has 8 to his 2 possibly 3. That is a huge statement for the superdelegates. Primaries not caucuses wins the general elections. Our election will pretty much be done by the time it hits the Midwest.

  • Posted By: guardedlyoptimistic @ 04/23/2008 12:56:25 AM

    Well, I suppose she could continue his legacy, I see her as strong on civl rights and while generally a centrist, she is left leaning on social issues. I think she would be a much better president than Mccain but not as good as Obama! I DO believe her career would be seriously impeded if she did not support the Democratic nominee! There still exists a certain decorum that is expected in parties! I would say the same about Obama, that if Hillary somehow managed to manipulate her way to victory, if he failed to strongly support her, it would certainly impact his future ambitions within the Democratic party. If you lose the race and do not qualify for the Olympic team, you're STILL going to root for the Americans at the Olympic Games...and so it will be in the Democratic party!!
    The majority of Republicans who have switched to the Democratic party favor Obama. 41% of Americans view Hillary as dishonest and insincere. She IS divisive, I would say less divisive now than when the campaign began, but she represents "Bill" to the Republicans and that motivates them to vote! I don't question her leadership ability or her intelligence, but I do question her ability to unite!

  • Posted By: guardedlyoptimistic @ 04/23/2008 12:24:58 AM

    Well, the problem is that a lot of voters ARE dingdongs who vote on the trivial matters that are put up as important!!! If people really LOOKED at things like "issues" Bush would NOT be our president now! If they looked at issues, McCain would NOT be considered a viable presidential candidate! Who really believes in the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy or the Honest Politician??? Sometimes we confuse the "real" with the "ideal" and hope for the best....and sometimes we're disappointed?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse