SPONSORED BY:

A Political Rerun

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

When Obama finally jumped into the void, he spoke of the need for party unity before talking about the subject he really wanted to debate: John McCain. "I'm confident that both Sen. Clinton's supporters and Sen. Obama's supporters will be supporting the Democratic nominee when we start engaging in that general election," he said, referring to himself as a strangely out-of-body experience.

Clinton talked about getting her supporters to back the ultimate nominee, suggesting that she didn't really see herself as the ultimate nominee. "I will do everything to make sure that the people who supported me support our nominee," she said.

That was enough of the happy unity talk. The inexorable logic of this 15-month-old primary season is that both candidates are locked into their past statements, previous positions and year-old arguments. They debate because they don't want to be seen as avoiding debates. And they campaign because that's their sole present occupation.

To pundits and the press, debates are about who gained the upper hand and whose performance was marginally better. Real voters may be looking for something more meaningful—such as an insight into character or policy that was unknown or unexpected. After 20 debates, such insight is desperately hard to find.

Clinton needed a game-changing moment, as she has since Obama opened up a sizable lead through 11 straight election wins in February. Judging by Obama's consistent poll advantage nationwide, it didn't happen after Obama's preacher's sermons came to light, and it didn't 
happen after his small-town comments last week. It didn't happen in Philadelphia on Wednesday, either.

Clinton opened a newish line of attack on Obama's connections to William Ayers, a former member of the Weather Underground. But Obama was more than ready for her criticism, pointing out that the connection was tenuous and that Bill Clinton had pardoned two former 
members of the same defunct terrorist group.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Jrmapu @ 04/23/2008 10:17:51 AM

    I don't disagree completely with you but I still don't trust Obama. Not all republicans are supportive of Obama. They don't want Hillary because she is a stronger adversary than Obama. He has too many secrets and skeletons that makes him a liability not a credit. Plus he could not win the states which win the White House. She has 8 to his 2 possibly 3. That is a huge statement for the superdelegates. Primaries not caucuses wins the general elections. Our election will pretty much be done by the time it hits the Midwest.

  • Posted By: guardedlyoptimistic @ 04/23/2008 12:56:25 AM

    Well, I suppose she could continue his legacy, I see her as strong on civl rights and while generally a centrist, she is left leaning on social issues. I think she would be a much better president than Mccain but not as good as Obama! I DO believe her career would be seriously impeded if she did not support the Democratic nominee! There still exists a certain decorum that is expected in parties! I would say the same about Obama, that if Hillary somehow managed to manipulate her way to victory, if he failed to strongly support her, it would certainly impact his future ambitions within the Democratic party. If you lose the race and do not qualify for the Olympic team, you're STILL going to root for the Americans at the Olympic Games...and so it will be in the Democratic party!!
    The majority of Republicans who have switched to the Democratic party favor Obama. 41% of Americans view Hillary as dishonest and insincere. She IS divisive, I would say less divisive now than when the campaign began, but she represents "Bill" to the Republicans and that motivates them to vote! I don't question her leadership ability or her intelligence, but I do question her ability to unite!

  • Posted By: guardedlyoptimistic @ 04/23/2008 12:24:58 AM

    Well, the problem is that a lot of voters ARE dingdongs who vote on the trivial matters that are put up as important!!! If people really LOOKED at things like "issues" Bush would NOT be our president now! If they looked at issues, McCain would NOT be considered a viable presidential candidate! Who really believes in the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy or the Honest Politician??? Sometimes we confuse the "real" with the "ideal" and hope for the best....and sometimes we're disappointed?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now