You complain that Colombia labels enemies as communists and terrorists, but in the same paragraph you label Colombia as a "murderous country". There have been many abuses in Colombia and the poor are usually those who suffer most. This does not mean that the US should refuse to deal with Colombia. These are issues that should be resolved through economic policies and dialogue, not labeling them as "monsters". The US embargo on Cuba did not bring Castro's regime down, how do you think that it will help resolve tyranny in Colombia.
I am hopeful that through relations with the rest of the world Colombia will be able to solve the economic and political problems that have caused so much unrest in the country. These problems cannot and will not be solved by calling them monsters and telling them we won't deal with them.
Look at the Alternatives
Colombia's president speaks out on the House's rejection of the U.S.-Colombia free-trade agreement.
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
President Alvaro Uribe of Colombia is in a tight spot. As a staunch U.S. ally against terrorism and drug trafficking, he has stood firmly against the wave of anti-U.S. sentiment that's sweeping Latin America. The Bush administration has tried to bolster Colombia's loyalty by sponsoring the U.S.-Colombia free-trade agreement, but the Democratic candidates have denounced the proposed pact—and last week Speaker Nancy Pelosi kept the bill from being brought to the floor of the House of Representatives. At a World Economic Forum meeting in Cancún, Mexico, an evidently perplexed President Uribe talked with NEWSWEEK's Lally Weymouth. Excerpts:
Weymouth: Speaker Pelosi has effectively killed the trade agreement until after the U.S. election. What is your reaction?
Uribe: We cannot lose our optimism. [There is a] long tradition of good relations between our two countries, and we cherish common democratic values. Colombia is a country fighting for security for all its citizens and for transparency [in government]. It is a country with political pluralism that respects independent institutions. We recognize our problems, but we are working every day, doing our best to overcome them.
Haven't you stuck your neck out to be a good U.S. ally in the War on Terror and the war on drugs? Are you thinking about alternatives to your strategic alliance with the United States if this treaty does not go through?
We have considered that. As for the House's approval of the free-trade agreement, the sooner the better. The more they analyze the current situation in Colombia—the efforts Colombia is making, the progress Colombia has made, the problems Colombia faces—the more they have to rethink and consider the possibility to approve the free-trade agreement.
What would you say to members of the House?
I invite them to visit Colombia—especially Speaker Pelosi. If she comes, she will find problems and progress, but she will see our total determination to overcome these problems.
Are the Colombians upset?
There are people who are upset, but my duty as president is to solve the impasse.
Union leaders in the United States oppose the trade agreement because they blame your administration for the recent killings of four Colombian union leaders.
When my government began, Colombia suffered the assassination of more than 250 trade-union leaders per year ... Last year [it was] 26. This year, if we consider trade unions plus teachers, we have seen 19 assassinations ... But we are not happy—because we need zero cases. At this moment, Colombia has a program under which we protect 9,000 Colombians, [of whom] 1,900 are trade-union leaders. They are beneficiaries of this individual protection ... We have more than 130 murderers in jail because of the determination of our government … Recently we increased the payroll of the Justice Administration with 2,000 new staff members, who were hired as investigators and prosecutors.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
Discuss