THE LAST WORD
Anna Quindlen
Once Upon a Principle
There was a time when John McCain had positions. Then he ran for president, and everything was suddenly up for grabs.
Barack Obama morphed in the public mind from populist to elitist with one ill-wrought comment about guns and faith and the "bitter" working class. Hillary Clinton responded by improbably re-creating herself as the kind of woman who knows her way around a shot glass and a rifle. But neither Democrat can match the transformation of the Republican candidate, who is running for president by turning his back on much of what he once was.
What John McCain really stands for came up most recently in light of his position on abortion. Planned Parenthood commissioned a survey showing that more than half of those women polled don't know much about McCain's stance, and a quarter of those who are in favor of keeping abortion legal mistakenly think the senator agrees.
That confusion may be because McCain has sometimes seemed confused as well. In 1999, during a campaign swing through California, he challenged conservative orthodoxy and said he did not support overturning Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that found a constitutional right to abortion. He explained that a reversal could lead some women to undergo illegal and dangerous operations.
This is just the sort of nuanced position that has led to the widespread notion of McCain as maverick. But it didn't last long. After the right went nuts, McCain backtracked and said he did favor the repeal of Roe, adding, however, that it might lead to dangerous illegal abortions. A day later, his campaign issued a "clarification," and by that time McCain was saying that if elected president he would actually work to overturn the court's decision. Any concern over the effects of illegal abortions disappeared overnight in the cold clear light of must-win.
What's interesting about all this is not the flip-flopping. All pols flip-flop: if they're Republicans, they describe it as "evolving," and if they're Democrats, they get pounded for it. (If either Clinton or Obama had followed the trajectory described above on an important issue, it would be running on a continuous loop around the digital news wire in Times Square.) And McCain's voting record on abortion is clear. He has a zero lifetime rating from the Planned Parenthood Action Fund because of his opposition to, among other things, family-planning funding and sex education. When benighted friends used to suggest that McCain was a stealth moderate, I urged them to look at his voting record, which was about as moderate as Strom Thurmond's.
But now even his record has become irrelevant, since to become the front runner McCain has jettisoned many of his past positions. The Bush tax cuts: McCain voted against them as a senator, but now says he would make them permanent as president. Immigration: he cosponsored a bill in 2005 to make it easier for those in the country illegally to become citizens, but now says that if his own bill—his own bill!—came to a vote on the Senate floor, he would vote against it. After Columbine, he called for more gun control; after Virginia Tech, he said more gun control was unnecessary.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: cowpunkrva @ 05/08/2008 2:46:38 PM
Comment: continued...
but the pro-choice advocates who equate abortion rights with our constitutional rights are making me sick. And let me just say this. For 20 of the past 28 years, we have had a pro-life president. Abortion is still legal is
it not? I really don't see how the abortion issue is worth choosing our president by.
Posted By: cowpunkrva @ 05/08/2008 2:43:10 PM
Comment: >found a constitutional right to abortion.
You mean the one that doesn't exist? Your article is called Once upon a Principle. What about the principle of judges not letting their personal views interfere with their decision on what the Constitution says? I am pro-choice with reservations, but the pro-choice who equates abortion rights with our rights of free thought
Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 04/28/2008 3:50:37 PM
Comment: Give it a rest Quindlen. Your usually partisan lens[left of center],refuses to see that the game is played with equal ferocity on both sides. An ''evolving''Republican will get just as pounded by the Democrat as vice versa. You forget that Obama was ''for''Justice Roberts before he was ''against''him. That Hillary was ''for''immediate Iraq withdrawl before she was ''against''it,and before she was ''for''it again. That policy makers of both parties were ''for''Ethanol before they were ''against ''it,and are ''for ''it again,to be ''against''it next week. This is hardly a portion of a McCain. Remember Pelosis ''road to peace''in Syria? I think the North Koreans have something to say regarding this right about now. How about the ''New Era''? The ''draining of the swamp''after the Democrat takeover? Business as usual reigns,with yet another fatcat Farm Bill of hundreds of billions in the offing even though farms are having it better than they have in decades. We could do this all day. With McCain,sure. But ALSO with the others,and those of both parties.