Helicopter Moms vs. Free-Range Kids

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

So why are some parents so nervous about letting their children out of their sight? Are cities and towns less safe and kids more vulnerable to crimes like child abduction and sexual abuse than they were in previous generations?

Not exactly. New York City, for instance, is safer than it's ever been; it's ranked 136th in crime among all American cities. Nationwide, stranger abductions are extremely rare; there's a one-in-a-million chance a child will be taken by a stranger, according to the Justice Department. And 90 percent of sexual abuse cases are committed by someone the child knows. Mortality rates from all causes, including disease and accidents, for American children are lower now than they were 25 years ago. According to Child Trends, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research group, between 1980 and 2003 death rates dropped by 44 percent for children ages five to 14 and 32 percent for teens aged 15 to 19.

Then there's the whole question of whether modern parents are more watchful and nervous about safety than previous generations. Yes, some are. Part of the problem is that with wall-to-wall Internet and cable news, every missing child case gets so much airtime that it's not surprising even normal parental paranoia can be amplified. And many middle-class parents have gotten used to managing their children's time and shuttling them to various enriching activities, so the idea of letting them out on their own can seem like a risk. Back in 1972, when many of today's parents were kids, 87 percent of children who lived within a mile of school walked or biked every day. But today, the Centers for Disease Control report that only 13 percent of children bike, walk or otherwise get themselves to school. (That lack of physical activity has prompted the CDC to create outreach programs designed to get kids walking to school again, in an effort to combat the childhood obesity epidemic.)

The extra supervision is both a city and a suburban phenomenon. Beth Turner, a stay-at-home mom of two in Lowry, Colo., a suburban community near Denver, lets her nine-year-old daughter Mikaleia walk to the playground, which is two and a half blocks from their house. But only when Mom and Dad are watching. And once she's there her parents check up on her periodically.

Meanwhile, in Los Angeles, Nick Goldberg, a father of three teenage sons, says that L.A.'s nine-year-olds do not generally have much freedom. "Parents are worried about crime, and they're worried about kids getting caught in traffic in a city that's not used to pedestrians," he says.

On the other hand, the trend toward more supervision isn't ubiquitous. There are still plenty of latch-key kids whose parents give them a lot of independence, by choice or by necessity. The After School Alliance finds that more than 14 million kids ages five to 17 are responsible for taking care of themselves after school. Only 6.5 million kids participate in organized programs. "Many children who have working parents have to take the subway or bus to get to school. Many do this by themselves because they have no other way to get to their schools," says Dr. Richard Gallagher, director of the Parenting Institute at the NYU Child Study Center.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: jlistsweeney @ 05/15/2008 12:49:58 PM

    I read this story during a flight home this week, and took great solace in it. My husband and I have had a commuter marriage for a year now - living in two cities due to our jobs - so when I have to travel for work, there is a predicament with our 16-year-old daughter. Her school is academically grueling so she begs to stay at home vs. being sent to grandma's or a friend's, protesting: "I'll fall too far behind in school!" After much trepidation, I have twice allowed her to stay at home alone, for one to three nights, with only a Labrador to protect her - and a neighbor keeping a watchful eye on the house. All seemed at peace when I returned last night ... she barely looked up from her studies when I walked in the door. I do feel better having read this article and blog!

  • Posted By: voicefrombk @ 05/13/2008 4:17:50 PM

    It seems that you choose to allow to live in fear of the "what-ifs" of life. Yes, bad things can & do happen everyday but the majority of things that we worry about as parents never happen. It is our responsibility to prepare our children to stand on their own without us and that training has to begin when our children are young. It is heartless and destructive not to give them the oppy to develop thinking skills and how to exercise good judgement and then send them out into the world.

  • Posted By: voicefrombk @ 05/13/2008 4:03:45 PM

    Guess what?? We all have daily interactions with people we don't know. This is life. Kids have to be taught how to interact with people they don't know. If my 10 yo needs help and I'm not there, she may have to ask someone she doesn't know for help. It is a part of life. You role play w/them, then watch them from a distance, and ultimately let them do it on their own. Too many kids today are spoiled, selfish, unthinking brats and it's their PARENTS fault!!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now