PENNSYLVANIA PRIMARY

The Quaker Vote

As Pennsylvania prepares to vote, the Society of Friends hopes its long-standing antiwar advocacy will have an impact on the election.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The British colony of Pennsylvania was founded by William Penn, a Quaker, in 1681 as a safe haven for the Society of Friends—at the time a persecuted sect. And though Quakers currently number less than 1 percent of the Keystone State's population, they hope to have an impact far beyond their numbers in Tuesday's Democratic primary.

In the years after Penn founded the commonwealth, Quakers dominated local government and politics. "Pennsylvania does have a tradition of listening to Quakers," says Steve Gulick, who has been a Friend for 30 years. "We have been very instrumental in pushing certain causes along."

Key among those causes is opposition to violence and warfare. With opposition to the war in Iraq growing, the society's antiwar advocacy is increasingly in the mainstream—particularly among Democratic primary voters. The faith's strong views on nonviolence are rooted in the "Peace Testimony," one of the Quakers' most important beliefs.

"It is a way of manifesting respect for that of God in all people," says Peter Larson, a teacher at Morristown Friends School. "That respect can't possibly be manifested by any sort of regime or any sort of situation that inflicts violence or force on people."

This pacifist belief has often put the Friends at odds with U.S. foreign policy. "I don't really support all the policies [of the United States]," says Hayward Deniver, who attends Green Street Quaker Meeting in Philadelphia's Germantown neighborhood. "But I guess that's the dilemma Quakers have had for 300 years."

Traditionally, Quakers have been unified in their social activism but pluralistic in their political preferences. Two Quakers have been elected to the U.S. presidency: Herbert Hoover in 1928 and Richard Nixon 40 years later, both on the GOP ticket. But in 2008 most Pennsylvania Quakers seem to be voting for one of the Democrats.

David La Fontaine, who also attends the Green Street Meeting, volunteered for Barack Obama before the Texas primary, making calls to potential voters. His desire for peace has thus far prevented him from contributing to Obama, however. "I don't really believe in giving Democrats money before the general election," he explains. "I don't want to fund their fighting with each other."

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Not stupid in Alabama @ 04/23/2008 8:49:32 AM

    Also, here's an interesting analysis of the way Obama tries to trick people into saying things, exposing a debater's strategy and mentality, not a search for truth.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/obamas_linguistic_trap.html

  • Posted By: Not stupid in Alabama @ 04/23/2008 8:48:52 AM

    And here's an interesting account that shows Obama's priorities:

    In a campaign influenced by Walmart, instead of backing the pro-labor candidate, Obama backed a "Walmart tool."


    There was little surprising about Obama???s endorsement given his deeper, interrelated and self-interested allegiances to the politically powerful corporate-neoliberal City Hall regime of Chicago???s Mayor Daley, with whom Obama shares the same big money campaign super-consultant (David Axlerod) and numerous big money sponsors.



    For the first time Mayor, Daley vetoed an ordinance by his normally obedient City Council, a measure was widely supported by citizens, community organizations, and labor unions in Chicago's black, Latino, and working-class wards. Originally passed by the council under pressure from a remarkable grassroots campaign, it would have required giant retail corporations like Wal-Mart, Target, Lowes, and Home Depot to pay workers a modest minimum wage of ten dollars an hour by 2010.



    Wal-Mart and Target announced that they were putting a number of ???big box??? retail developments on hold in Chicago, and launched a preemptive public relations strike, threatening to disinvest in the city unless a ???favorable business climate??? was restored. Daley made a special point of wrapping his veto in the flag of racial justice, claiming it was required to permit the flowering of economic development in the city???s abandoned ghetto neighborhoods.



    Pat Dowell, the recipient of significant support from the Service Employees??? International Union (SEIU), was running against Tillman in the name of working families and economic justice. Dowell strongly criticized Tillman for siding with Daley and Wal-Mart.




    Obama needed the support of the powerful campaign finance magnet Daley, and endorsed Tillman, over the principled, serious and labor-backed Dowell.



    Obama???s wife Michelle then received $51,200 in 2006 for attending a few board meetings of TreeHouse Foods, a giant firm that relied heavily on its close business relationship with Wal-Mart (The granting of high-pay/do-little board posts to the spouses of politicians is a longstanding tool of the ???old,??? corporate-dominated politics that Senator Obama claims to reject). Mrs. Obama resigned from this position in the summer of 2007, citing ???increased demands on her time??? in connection with her husband???s presidential campaign. It isn't surprising that she cut her politically damaging ties to a notoriously anti-labor company that her husband was attacking in speeches to please popular audiences concerned about the growing chasm between the rich and poor in the U.S.

  • Posted By: Not stupid in Alabama @ 04/23/2008 8:48:22 AM

    Obama often says he put down the wrong thing in error. examples:

    Barack Obama angered fellow Democrats in the Illinois Senate when he voted to strip millions of dollars from a child welfare office on Chicago's West Side. But Obama had a ready explanation: He goofed. "I was not aware that I had voted no," he said that day in June 2002, asking that the record be changed to reflect that he "intended to vote yes."

    On March 19, 1997, Obama announced he had fumbled an election-reform vote the day before, on a measure that passed 51 to 6: "I was trying to vote yes on this, and I was recorded as a no," he said.

    On March 20, 1997, Obama voted "present" on a key telecommunications vote.
    HEY CWA members, WAKE UP and smell the TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA.

    He stood on March 11, 1999, to take back his vote against legislation to end good-behavior credits for certain felons in county jails. "I pressed the wrong button on that," he said.

    He was the lone dissenter on Feb. 24, 2000, against 57 yeas for a ban on human cloning. "I pressed the wrong button by accident," he said.

    On Nov. 14, 1997, he backed legislation to permit riverboat casinos to operate even when the boats were dockside. The measure, pushed by the gambling industry and fought by church groups whose support Obama was seeking, passed with two "yeas" to spare -- including Obama's. He wasn't exactly up front with his constituency, telling a church group on a 1998 campaign questionnaire that he was "undecided" about whether he backed an expansion of riverboat gambling. The senator who led the opposition to the gambling measure, Republican Todd Sieben, said "He was obviously paying attention to this vote. It was a major, major issue in the state, and it was a long debate," Sieben said. "The inadvertent 'Oops, I missed the switch' -- I'd be kind of skeptical of that."

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now