Posted By: Holly Garfield @ 04/25/2008 10:15:51 AM
Comment: I may agree that the problems Loretta Napoleoni cites exist. However, the main contribution to the current financial situation is still the US subprime market, opacity in vehicles attached to the toxic loans and very poor management at the top financial institutions. The rogue economic environment is a big problem, especially in the emerging and still closed markets, but the size of the problem is still no match for the subprime problems. The size difference of the underlying markets is still too great for rogue economics to be a major factor today. Her contention that unemployment went from virtual 100% to 0% at the Berlin wall collapse is economically impossible. Besides, if there had been 100% employment the Soviet bloc would never have collapsed in the first place. The doubling of the labor supply in the west clearly doesn't apply to the US. I live in an area with a huge immigrant population, and about 20% of the population here is first generation immigrants, including many from southeast Asia and Africa. How much of that doubling is from Soviet bloc countries migrating to NATO? Rogue economics is a problem that involves the maturing of currently developing economies. We need better regulation to bring transparency to the financial markets worldwide. We need central bank regulation to keep the normal economic cycles under control. Much of the economic swing is due to trying to artificially extend the normal upswing. The market in sex slaves may be repugnant, but is a drop in the bucket of the global economy. I notice there were no numeric analyses in this article to back up her contentions. Without those analyses her arguments are hard to either defend or deny. Without those numbers I really can't see justifying her conclusions. The numeric information she does give seems to have no basis in reality.


Loading Menu