ENVIRONMENT AND LEADERSHIP

Iceland’s Green Man

How a tiny island nation weaned itself off fossil fuels and took the lead in alternative energy.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Iceland Prime Minister Geir Haarde, who since 2006 has presided over this small country that derives 80 percent of its energy needs from renewable sources, has been named the greenest political leader by NEWSWEEK. Iceland's happy status—which has insulated it from spiraling costs of coal, natural gas and oil—derives in large measure from accidents of geography. The country sits atop volcanoes that provide geothermal energy and possesses glaciers that produce waterfalls, which turn electricity-generating turbines. But while nature endowed Iceland with natural resources, it has taken decades of sustained leadership to wean Iceland off coal and other fossil fuels. Yet the focus on renewables has allowed Iceland to develop new industries and play an outsize role on the global stage. In March, Haarde sat down with NEWSWEEK's Daniel Gross to discuss Iceland's green energy past—and future.

GROSS: Iceland seems farthest along in developing a post-fossil-fuel economy. How have you managed to get here?
HAARDE: We are blessed with a lot of clean and renewable energy. For us, it's always been natural to use the natural warm water that comes out of the ground. We have done that for centuries to heat pools to bathe in, and for the past 70 years to heat our houses. These sources provide almost all our electricity. We don't import coal. We have no use for it.

It ' s an accident of geography and geology?
In part. I met the governor of Wyoming at a conference in Rome last November, and he said they have enough coal in the U.S. to last 200 years. From that perspective I can see how difficult it is to change behavior, because there is no imminent threat. It's a question of relative prices.

But governments can also affect relative prices through subsidies and tax policy. How important have such policies been in getting people to change their behavior?
We have put in some incentives for people to use nontraditional energy sources for their cars. We have been experimenting with hydrogen, and have a small research program with Daimler, Shell and others. But I don't think a small nation like Iceland can be in the forefront of the technology to transport cars with hydrogen.

Iceland is, however, trying to export some of its renewable-energy expertise.
Our companies that are active in the geothermal area are in the forefront of technology in that field and are now experimenting with what they call deep drilling, which involves going twice as far down and potentially producing 10 times more energy. It could be a breakthrough.

The decision to dam a river and build a new hydroelectric plant to service Alcoa ' s giant new smelter in east Iceland was controversial. What trade-offs did that entail?
The Alcoa project is a very big and important plant because it revitalized the economy on the east coast of Iceland. But there are different opinions in Iceland on how to use our resources. My view is that from a global perspective it is responsible to produce aluminum in Iceland from clean energy sources rather than produce it elsewhere from fossil fuels. The plant went through all the necessary environmental-impact assessments. It's a first-class plant. They are very conscious about the environment, about ensuring equal-opportunity employment for women, and are responsible citizens of the community.

 
Discuss
Sponsored by