- 1
- 2
Questions for Obama
• During the ABC debate, you acknowledged that when the capital gains rate was dropped first to 20 percent, then to 15 percent, government revenues from the tax increased and they declined in the 1980s when it was increased to 28 percent. Nevertheless, you said you would consider raising the rate "for purposes of fairness." How does decreasing the government's financial resources and punishing investors promote fairness? Are you aware that 20 percent of taxpayers reporting capital gains in 2006 had incomes of less than $50,000?
• You favor eliminating the cap on earnings subject to the 12.4 percent Social Security tax, which now covers only the first $102,000. A Chicago police officer married to a Chicago public-school teacher, each with 20 years on the job, have a household income of $147,501, so you would take another $5,642 from them. Are they undertaxed? Are they rich?
• This November, electorates in four states will vote on essentially this language: "The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education or public contracting." Three states—California, Washington and Michigan—have enacted such language. You made a radio ad opposing the Michigan initiative. Why? Are those states' voters racists?
• You denounce President Bush for arrogance toward other nations. Yet you vow to use a metaphorical "hammer" to force revisions of trade agreements unless certain weaker nations adjust their labor, environmental and other domestic policies to suit you. Can you define cognitive dissonance?
• You want "to reduce money in politics." In February and March you raised $95 million. See prior question.
But coming next, questions for John McCain.
© 2008
- 1
- 2


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: readmore @ 05/14/2008 4:00:31 PM
Comment: Your anaylsis of the Social Security tax only shows you have no understanding of how that works, and you are only interested in misleading others that don't understand payroll taxes. You state that the couple earns over $147,501 and the change would increase their taxes. SSA taxes are based on individual earnings and are not calculated as a couple. Your example would indicate that each member of this couple makes less than the cap of 102,000 and would pay the max amount anyway. No change in that cap would effect this couple. Also you note the percentage of 12.4, this is the combined amount of both the OASDI and the Medicare tax. Medicare Tax has no limit while the OASDI has a cap. Why should those that make less pay tax on their entire earnings while those that benefit more from society pay only a small portion of their earnings. Fairness would mean that we all pay the same percentage of tax for everything we earn. Catch up and make sure you numbers are correct before you throw them around.
Posted By: marsh83 @ 05/14/2008 1:39:13 PM
Comment: you have a tremendous amount of free time. oh, btw, i don't think you really get it.
Posted By: marsh83 @ 05/14/2008 1:24:29 PM
Comment: millions of iraqis have lost their homes and cannot return for fear of being murdered? you have got to check out new sources of information - or finish all of the kool-aid, and quickly.