- 1
- 2
The Body Politic
Anorexia affects far more women than men, especially women in their teens and early 20s. Researchers don't know why, although some believe a genetic predisposition toward particular emotional disorders can be triggered by anxiety about emerging adulthood. "Often young women feel that their lives are out of control," says Marleen Williams, a psychology professor at Brigham Young University who specializes in eating disorders. The reasons for this feeling of helplessness can be simply the pressures of growing up or they can be more deeply rooted, such as an unstable family relationship or a traumatic childhood. Controlling food intake, she says, gives these women the illusion that they are more in charge. But altering just one factor—media images—won't stop the downward spiral, Williams says. "Helping women learn real solutions to life's challenges and making society safer for women would probably do more to decrease eating disorders," she says.
From a public policy point of view, prosecuting victims of a mental disorder—the anorexics and bulimics who typically run these Web sites—seems like cruel and unusual punishment. "Any law that targets victims is ill-considered," says Susan Scafidi, a law professor at Fordham University and an expert on fashion law. "Surely we can find a better way to help these people than criminalizing their speech." Providing more treatment facilities for those already suffering would be far more helpful—as would helping educators and parents learn how to spot early warning signs of trouble.
As devastating as anorexia and bulimia are for those who suffer from those disorders, obesity—the target of the New York regulation—is a far more widespread public health problem and one that seems ever more intractable. New York's public health officials have been fighting hard, with a publicity campaign to get people to eat less and exercise more and a ban on harmful trans fats in restaurants. The calorie-posting regulation is the latest weapon in this arsenal. Among other objections, restaurant owners claim their First Amendment rights are violated if they are required to post a government message. Some say they don't mind posting calories but they just don't want to be told to do it. (Curious customers can already find out the damage they're doing to their diets by logging on to the site of their favorite fast-food outlets and searching for nutrition info; most major chains now have it somewhere—although it can take some digging to find it.)
Whatever the ultimate legal resolution, news coverage of the court battle emphasizes the fact that many chain restaurants are serving up meals that contain almost a whole day's worth of calories and way too much fat. And as that message becomes more widespread, maybe people will begin to pay more attention to what they're putting in their mouths. Even small changes—like forgoing the fries, for example—can make a big difference. And there is evidence that heightening public awareness can be a successful strategy—although perhaps not immediately. Thirty years ago, when the antismoking effort was in its infancy, few believed that it would succeed. But today smoking rates are down significantly. Better public information was critical, as were warnings on packages, higher prices, and laws that limit smoking in public places.
How can those lessons be applied to the obesity epidemic? Public education is a start, but the sad truth is that information isn't always enough to get people to change deeply entrenched unhealthy habits, says Kenyon College psychology professor Michael Levine, who studies eating disorders. Levine uses himself as an example. He suffers from sleep apnea partly brought on by extra weight that his doctor has told him he should lose. And he understands how to make it happen better than most people. Still, he hasn't abandoned fast food. "I don't think the answer is posting calories," he says. Would a tax on high-fat foods help? Or a ban on eating desserts in public? Imagine the uproar if any public official suggested these measures. Eating disorders and obesity are major public health issues, and it's right and proper for the government to push measures that encourage change, but in the end it's up to each of us to act in our own best interest—one forkful at a time.
© 2008
- 1
- 2


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: wellsphere @ 05/07/2008 1:57:20 PM
Comment: I think it's a great idea for restaurants to post info. It's even harder to eat well when eating out, especially when you have dietary needs or want to watch your calorie intake. Often food items that seem healthy and are marketed that way, are not. For this reason, my company just launched a new service called ???Wellternatives??? that lets people find nutrition info for thousands of chain restaurants ??? right from their cell phone or on the web. It also makes recommendations for a healthier alternative to your favorite restaurant meals, hence the name???Wellternatives. Would love to hear what you think of it! Sara
Posted By: Terrils @ 04/30/2008 5:35:04 PM
Comment: "In fact, being too ... fat is the result of a complex set of social and personal factors"
Hm. Here I thought that for most of us it was simply eating too much and not moving enough. But I bet there's a slew of books out there to help me navigate this "complex" set of factors ... even though most of them seem to ultimately suggest eating less and moving more.
Posted By: skinnyminny2 @ 04/30/2008 10:50:39 AM
Comment: You cannot make an anorexic change her weight without treatment. Anorexia is a serious mental disease, and no amount of regulation will fix that. The thing about anorexia is that it's about a lot more than food and body image--it just manifests itself as an obsession over restrictive eating. I've been livng with anorexia and it's more about control and self-worth--the anorexic mind is very complex. It seems government does not understand this. Skinny models simply validate our disorder, they do not typically cause it.
As far as obesity goes, in my opinion it is not a mental illness as anorexia is but rather a combination of not wanting to eat healthy and lack of education on how to. Eating better requires COOKING and planning, and I suppose it's much easier for some people to pop open a box or buy pre-made garbage. Sadly, I have heard of food pantries having to throw away much of their fresh produce because no one wants it. People complain about the cost of fresh stuff and when it's offered to them, they take the SPAM instead.
Eating healthy is NOT as expensive as people think--I just bought some bags of frozen veggies for 89 cents a bag and found dry bean soups for just $1 a bag with 8 servings. People do need this information, but what they chose to do with it is ultimately on them.