SPONSORED BY:

It’s the Agronomy, Stupid

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Are rising food prices going to reduce political resistance to planting GM crops?
We are already seeing this happen. A big food importer in Japan is now bringing in GM corn. Consumers mostly live in the city and don't normally think about how the food they eat got to market. The current crisis creates an opportunity because we can remind consumers how it happens and that agricultural policy needs to be carefully thought out. There are only a few countries in the world that export food, including the U.S., the former Soviet countries, Brazil, Argentina, Canada and Australia. All these use GM crops, not because they are seeing increased productivity but because they are professional farmers and know GM gives them some important tools for modern agriculture. The first step for food companies is to explain to the wider public that GM is not what they feared. Policy makers are going to see it as an important tool. But we shouldn't use the food crisis to say that biotech is a silver bullet.

How much of the blame for high food prices should be attributed to ethanol produced from farm crops like corn?
Those who are demonizing ethanol are either misinformed or diverting attention from the real issues. I recently read a claim that anyone who fills up an SUV with corn-based ethanol is consuming enough corn to feed a poor family for year. Corn in the U.S. is only for animal feed. Only 3 percent of the U.S. crop is sweet corn for human consumption. So turning corn to ethanol is not taking food from peoples' mouths. No one is saying that if you didn't turn sugar cane into ethanol people would have more to eat. The major culprit for rising food prices is the cost of oil. There is a discussion about bioethanol that is warranted. It's about where, when and if governments should subsidize crops for biofuels. Some ways to make ethanol are more efficient than others. Sugar cane has a better conversion rate for bioethanol than does corn. But corn has contributed somewhat to energy self-sufficiency. Remember that we are at the cutting edge of this technology. To back away from biofuel now would be a global mistake.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Solving the Palin Puzzle
Solving the Palin Puzzle

See how well you can see Sarah from your house, by taking our trivia quiz.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Dial 'A' for Accessory
Dial 'A' for Accessory

This season's top i-Phone add-ons.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: smokey_joe @ 05/14/2008 5:28:29 PM

    An executive of the South African corporation, Sasol, has stated in a TV interview that his company can set up facilities to convert coal to liquid fuel by the Fischer-Tropisch process for any state or region in the USA that has coal deposits that they would like to exploit. Governor Brian Schweitzer, did you hear that?

  • Posted By: smokey_joe @ 05/09/2008 7:20:41 PM

    Finally, someone with a brain and substantial supply of facts is telling the real truth about food crops and biofuels. All of the hack journalists who have dabbled in this area should take note and keep their rumors and misinformation to themselves until they do some real research and at least learn the basics of world economics and agriculture. That should keep them quiet for at least a few years.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now