WORLD AFFAIRS

War is the Answer

Sri Lanka's leaders are testing a dangerous theory: that the best way to end a civil war is by winning it.

Sri Lanka, Tamil Tigers, war
Deshakalyan Chowdhury / AFP-Getty Images
Peacemakers: Sri Lanka's Army has tried to wipe out the Tigers once and for all
 
Sponsored by
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

The city bus, packed with commuters, had just pulled out of a dusty terminal in Colombo, Sri Lanka's capital, when the massive explosion ripped it apart, leaving 26 dead and more than 60 wounded. The April 25 attack was another tragic episode in Sri Lanka's seemingly interminable civil war. For 25 years, the government has been locked in battle with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). The group is fighting for an independent homeland for the country's ethnic Tamils, who make up about a quarter of Sri Lanka's 20 million inhabitants. The Tigers routinely attack civilians, and pioneered suicide bombing in the 1980s. Overall, the war has cost more than 70,000 lives on both sides and frustrated attempts at a settlement.

Until recently. In the past year, an end to conflict has seemed tantalizingly close, thanks to a government offensive that has seized vast tracts of territory and decimated the Tigers' leadership. Success is not guaranteed; President Mahinda Rajapaksa has publicly promised that the campaign, which is bankrupting his government, would end by January 2009. But the remarkable progress achieved already is challenging the conventional wisdom about civil wars from Yugoslavia to Iraq: that there is no military solution.

Security experts worldwide are watching Sri Lanka closely as a test case for an idea that has lately gained currency. The "peace through victory" theory holds that civil wars that end with one side militarily beating the other result in more lasting peace than do those that end with a negotiated settlement. Somalia and Algeria are considered examples of the latter camp. Many hope that Sri Lanka will become the prime exemplar of the former.

The Army's accomplishments over the past 18 months certainly are impressive. It has managed to wrest control of seven of the island's districts from the Tigers, leaving the guerrillas with just two. The Sri Lankan Navy has bested the LTTE's Sea Tiger light attack-boats in several critical engagements and has sunk a number of their floating offshore arms depots. Sri Lanka's Air Force has killed two high-ranking Tiger leaders in the past six months. And the government says it only narrowly missed killing Velupillai Prabhakaran, the Tigers' elusive commander and founder, in a December air raid. Meanwhile, crackdowns on the LTTE's financing and arms networks by the United States, the European Union, India and Australia have hampered the Tigers' ability to raise funds and smuggle in weapons.

This is all the payoff of a gamble initiated by Rajapaksa, who was elected in 2005 with the backing of hard-line Sinhalese Buddhist parties. (In addition to being an ethnic conflict, the Sri Lankan civil war is a religious one: most Sinhalese are Buddhist, while most Tamils are Hindu.) Last year, sensing that strengthened international cooperation against terrorism, combined with the defection of a key Tiger commander, had weakened the LTTE, and responding to growing exasperation with the LTTE's repeated violations of a 2002 ceasefire agreement, Rajapaksa decided to go for broke. Promising to destroy the LTTE by the end of 2008, he doubled the defense budget to $1.5 billion, about 5.8 percent of GDP, and gave his military commanders a free hand. The armed forces restructured, adding 40,000 new recruits, forming five new divisions and doubling salaries. Lt. Gen. Sarath Fonseka, the Army chief, brushed aside considerations of rank and seniority to promote competent, battle-tested commanders. He also started an intensive jungle-warfare training program, forming elite units designed to operate inside Tiger territory and use guerrilla tactics. And he began purchasing loads of new military hardware.

The Sri Lankan Air Force added four MiG-27 attack jets and radar, cutting down on the LTTE's use of light aircraft, which they have used to carry out devastating surprise attacks in the past, and forcing the Tigers back into the jungle. And the Navy added new patrol boats and maritime radar—courtesy of the United States.

But the Tigers—still thought to number 5,000 hard-core fighters and considered one of the most effective terrorist groups in the world—remain a serious threat. After making rapid gains last year—helped by intelligence supplied by Col. Karuna Amman, the turncoat LTTE commander —the government's offensive has bogged down. Its troops have struggled to seize the dense Wanni Forest, on the southern edge of the Tigers' territory. In the north, rebel fighters managed to lure the Army late last month into a trap near Muhamalai and, by the government's own admission, kill 43 of its soldiers.

The LTTE have also stepped up their terror attacks, assassinating two top government ministers in suicide blasts since January. According to the International Committee of the Red Cross, 180 civilians were killed in just the first six weeks of this year. And government intelligence reports that the Tigers are managing to continue smuggling in weapons.

In Colombo, there is a growing sense that the government's time is running out. Rajapaksa has borrowed heavily to finance the campaign, and inflation has now hit a record-high 29 percent. Last week, Standard & Poor's downgraded Sri Lanka's debt rating and warned of dire consequences if spending is not curtailed. Public support for the war, once high, is waning. Military commanders have begun backing away from earlier promises to eliminate the LTTE by January. Further complicating matters, military recruitment is lagging and desertion is increasing, despite the pay hikes.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: thambirajan @ 04/11/2009 5:18:43 PM

    Also get your facts right. Tamils make up less than 12% of the population of Sri Lanka. How is that a "quarter" as you claim? Ridiculous.

  • Posted By: thambirajan @ 04/11/2009 4:48:24 PM

    Overall the majority of this piece was pretty neutral, for a change, but Why oh Why is every article on this issue always filled with several paragraphs of gibberish, which expose the authors for their lack of research ability and also their excellence at re-spouting terrorist propaganda?! Pathetic. Another note for the future, Jeremy, this war has never been about religion. It has been a tale of terrorists and their civilian supporters who saw their last best chance of dominating the Sinhalese (something which their ancestors for thousands of years had tried and failed miserably to achieve) as the Independence movement gathered momentum back in the 1940s. From those days onwards, they resorted to terrorism with the training of a succession of countries, starting with India's RAW, followed soon by the UK and Norway; and the funding of those completely oxymoronic organizations, the NGOs. Finally terrorism is being defeated, and the peace and prosperity of the Sinhalese and the Sinhala nation is about to be guarunteed once again. Thank you Rajapakse brothers, thank you Armed Forces, and above all, All Hail the Sinhalese!

  • Posted By: thambirajan @ 04/11/2009 4:48:06 PM

    First of all, there is only one Buddhist party, not the "parties" that you claim. Secondly, Tamils are not discriminated against. In actual fact, successive Sinhala governments have discriminated against the SINHALESE while tamils had free reign to dominate the civil service, professional classes, business, and land ownership - a disgusting remnant of colonial favouritism of the converted-to-Christianity tamils. Any attempts to redress this imbalance and bring equality to ALL citizens of Sri Lanka always leads to claims of "discrimination" by tamils. Please provide evidence of the "discrimination" and the lack of "interest in reaching out" before regurgitating pro-terrorist tamil propaganda.

    Also, how APPALING to see a commentor desecrating the name of Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgama, a true son of Sri Lanka, a Tamil, and a man who was against tamil separatism and terrorism with every fibre of his being. Sadly, he was assassinated by the "liberators" and "saviours" of the Tamils, by an LTTE execution squad, one of hundreds of moderate Tamils executed by the LTTE with the support of their Diaspora and foreign agents (including NGOs and foreign "diplomats") in order to maintain their hold over the Tamil population.

    Oh and lovejusticepeace, the red COLOUR existed before communists and communism. It is a colour that has been associated with the national flag of the Sinhalese and the Sinhala Nation since time immemorial - a flag that has been in existence for longer than most of these preaching hypocritical western nations and their terror supporting duplicitous officials and NGOs. Get OVER it.

    This article started off on a bad note with the completely inaccurate and laughably unresearched claim of the existence of several Sinhala Buddhist "parties," although there is only one such party, which has little support from the Sinhala population. Then, it ends with the implication that people who are interested in preserving the sovereignty of an Ancient nation can be described as "hardliners." How would you then describe those who invade other countries which pose absolutely no threat to their own country? Silent on that eh?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse