Quantcast
 
 
 
CAMPAIGN 2008

The Budget According to McCain: Part I

Think it's all about cutting earmarks? Think again.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Summary
McCain's big promise is that he can balance the budget while extending Bush's tax cuts and adding a few of his own. He likes to leave the impression that this can be done painlessly, for example, by eliminating "wasteful" spending in the form of "earmarks" that lawmakers like to tuck into spending bills to finance home-state projects. We found that not only is this theory full of holes, it's not even McCain's actual plan. In this story we examine the spending-cut side of McCain's budget program. In Part II, we'll look at what McCain has said about taxes.

McCain's pronouncements on cutting spending, and even on the growth in the size of the federal government, are dubious at best:

McCain seems to say that he can save $100 billion by cutting out earmarks. But budget experts say that cutting earmarks would actually save very little. And questioned more closely, McCain's campaign now says that his planned savings have nothing to do with eliminating earmarks.

With earmarks out as a potential source of savings, McCain hasn't said what he'd cut out of the discretionary budget to get to $100 billion. He's even indicated that defense spending might increase. In inflation-adjusted dollars, federal spending is projected to come to $2.45 trillion in fiscal 2009, including $1.4 trillion for Social Security, Medicare, military spending and veterans programs. The last time the budget was "trillions" smaller was 1951.

McCain says that "just in the last few years" the government has puffed up "by 40 percent, by trillions." Actually, it has taken federal spending a decade to grow 40 percent, and even longer to grow by "trillions." This year federal spending is projected to come to $2.45 trillion, including $1.4 trillion for Social Security, Medicare, military spending and veterans programs.

Update, May 16: In our original article, we did not specify in the summary that the $2.45 trillion in federal spending is measured in inflation-adjusted dollars, with 2000 as a baseline. Also, we have changed the summary to reflect that the estimate is for fiscal year 2009, as we say in the Analysis section; the spending levels are still being developed by Congress.

Also, we should not have said that student loans were part of the discretionary budget, as we did originally. They are not. And we have changed the term "assistance to veterans" to be more specific, since some veterans programs are mandatory and some are discretionary.

Analysis
Beginning, appropriately enough, with an April 15 speech, presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain began unveiling a series of economic proposals. He elaborated on his plan in an April 16 interview with Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC and again in an April 20 appearance on "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" and has continued repeating many of his claims on the stump. In the first of our two-part article on McCain's budget and tax proposals, we look at his plan to reduce government spending.

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: patattn2me @ 05/21/2008 2:06:11 PM

    Comment: I would like to discuss the possibility of Hilliary clinton becomming the Veep for Obama. When picking a former rival for Veep we must consider outcomes;
    1. Kennedy paired with Johnson. Outcome; Death with Johnson becomming president.
    2. Reagan paired with Bush. Outcome; Nearly killed while Bush lunched with Hinkley's dad.
    3, Obama paired with Clinton? Not if Obama is truly smart given the history of such choices!!!

  • Posted By: dking312 @ 05/17/2008 7:53:52 AM

    Comment: I love Newsweek and The Times for doing a detailed check on things like this and then presenting them in an easy format that allows me to check references as well as see THE BULLSPIT!! McNoTHANKS should know better...every time I see the guy, he's somewhere looking goofy talking about (?) & moving his hands funny. Doesn't he look like he tries TOOO hard to look presidental? Why does he need to fling his arms all over the place?

    Can we also mention the self interests he would have in our economy if president? Wife has large company, large income (Elitist? Too good to show tax returns??). He raises taxes on the wealthy...who won't get any head for a long time? You guessed it!!
    SO, that would leave him no choice but to tax us lower income folks dry. ;{

  • Posted By: votenic @ 05/14/2008 4:31:06 PM

    Comment: 2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll
    http://www.votenic.com
    You Won't Believe These Results!

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Speedo's new and controversial high-tech LZR suit is helping swimmers smash dozens of records. How the company plans to capitalize on Olympic gold.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu