SPONSORED BY:

Belly Up to the Barr

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

In 2003, Reason [a libertarian magazine] called you the "most conservative member of Congress." How can you now lead the Libertarian party having once had that reputation?
I've had the opportunity over the last few years to work with the Libertarians. They've had a chance to get to know me. Of course, there are always going to be some naysayers, but the vast majority of Libertarians that I've worked with have come to understand my views and my commitment to the Libertarian Party and its principles. I also have explained many times to Libertarians that the post-9/11 world is a very different world from the one I served in Congress. The threats to our liberty in a post-9/11 world are dramatically greater than prior to that. The changes have really necessitated—in my case and I think in the eyes of a lot of Americans—a re-evaluation of where we stand on a whole range of issues regarding government power and have really highlighted the need to start rolling those back with greater urgency.

Would you admit that your just being in the race, regardless of whether you win or lose, will remove votes from the GOP candidate?
No. I don't believe the votes I'll get will come from McCain voters. Mr. McCain stands for something very different from what I do. His voters would not be likely to vote for me, and mine would not be likely do vote for him.

Do you think you can win over a sizable number of would-be Democratic voters?
A lot of the votes I will get will come from disaffected voters who are inclined not to vote for McCain. Those would be constitutional conservatives, libertarian-leaning Republicans—and, yes, even some Democrats as well are attracted to the civil liberties message of work and the credibility I have but would not be predisposed to the big-government programs that Senator Obama has planned.

Are there enough of those voters for you to win?
Absolutely. I analyze this as a three-way race.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Scribble @ 05/24/2008 5:34:06 PM

    Barr is a choice in a group of ' Yes we can' politics. He would be the best -- Barr none.
    Ray Cates
    Ocala, Florida

  • Posted By: rickprn @ 05/23/2008 1:37:13 AM

    Bob Barr is the LAST thing this country needs right now (or at any time). He is a polarizing divider who's own former party (Republicans) cast out as a loser. He is simply trying to make over his "blow hard" past that even the Neocons rejected.

  • Posted By: A U.S. Citizen @ 05/22/2008 2:04:44 AM

    According to the story, Mr. Barr was active in the impeachment of President Clinton. If he was still in Congress, would he have been as vocal about impeaching President Bush for violation of the fourth amendment, torturing prisoners in violation of U.S. and intenational law or launching a pre-emptive strike against Iraq without an imminent threat even if there were WMD. Does he believe that lying about WMD is as bad as lying about one's sexual activity?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now