SPONSORED BY:

Girls Gone Mild

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The most enduring legacy of "Sex and the City" may be, as its title suggests, the sex. The show was the first to daringly and shamelessly discuss anal intercourse, vibrators, the taste of sperm (or, as the show put it, spunk). Today, as older women exchange grim words about settling, thousands of young women in their teens and 20s take quizzes to determine which "SATC" characters they are and join Facebook groups called "Everything I Know About Life I Learned From 'Sex and the City'." The median age of the audience has dropped by five years, to 33, from when it debuted. Even 15-year-old singer Miley Cyrus says it's her favorite show. Bennett sees it as "its own little liberation movement. It revolutionized the way we conceptualized and visualized sex, the way we discussed it with our friends and set our expectations in the dating world. Sex suddenly became an acceptable brunch-time conversation, and it brought our discussions of it out in the open. It made it OK to play the field, and to talk and laugh about doing so. And witnessing one orgasm after another went a long way toward making us believe we were entitled to good sex—and that we could demand it."

The loosening of sexual mores is undeniable. But perhaps younger generations give the show too much credit. For those who were already in their 20s when it aired, "SATC" did not tell them what to do, it revealed what they were already doing—and emboldened them to do more. The "SATC" women were not the first to loudly proclaim their sexual desires. "A hard man," purred Mae West many decades ago, "is good to find." Madonna did more than any other female icon of the late 20th century to promote women's independent, complex sexual desires. (Her 1992 book "Sex" makes the "SATC" girls look like prudish pussycats.) Helen Gurley Brown, who wrote "Sex and the Single Girl" in 1962, declared: "Good girls go to heaven. Bad girls go everywhere." In fact, you could argue that "Sex and the City" did not start a movement—it asked what a movement meant for our relationships. Carrie Bradshaw did not answer questions about finding love and meaning outside marriage—she just asked them. She simply allowed us into her confusion, and reflected our own. And for this, women will travel thousands of miles to the house of a fictional character and cry when they see it. Perhaps the key to the show's longevity is that, in grappling with the fact that it is impossible to predict, control or tame our hearts, it's good to know we have company. Just don't expect a satire of the search for Prince Charming in the film. You're more likely to find a portrait of an eager Cinderella trying to slip her feet into Manolo Blahniks, their labels angled firmly toward the camera.

With Jessica Bennett and Karen Springen

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: meerim @ 05/29/2008 7:46:42 PM

    As much as I wanted to like SATC, I coudn't. I never understood why there was never a woman of color (and I don't mean a random appearance of a mulato/indian/asian face so that the staff is not sued over racial discriminationa). This is NEW YORK! Last time I checked, it was the most diverse place one could ever imagine! I also never understood, why the show has made an assumption that every woman can afford $500 pair of shoes. Is this the marker of fashion? I love fashion, but I am not able to afford such prices, and as far as I know, 90% of women in this country are in the same boat as me. I hope there will be a fun, truly diverse show that celebrates women of all colors and shapes and backgrounds, and does not encourage sexual promiscuity, but supports freedom of choice.

  • Posted By: Ruby220 @ 05/29/2008 6:02:03 PM

    So why do we need to analyze the legacy of SATC? Can't it just be really good entertainment? To me, it celebrates the really special bond that women provide to one another regardless of sex, babies, boyfriends, marriage, careers or the lack thereof. Those things come and go. Men might come and go. Your best friends are truly yours till death do you part. "And, that Charlie Brown is what Christmas is all about."

  • Posted By: Andrea M. @ 05/29/2008 4:47:38 PM

    Outstanding article. I completely agree. As a single, childfree woman by choice, and a HUGE Sex and the City fan, I am truly disappointed with the way the series ended, and especially, with what I fear will be a naive, dumbed-down, plot designed to please the masses, without much regard to the original concept of joyful independence. Like everyone else, HBO is just trying to make a profit, but it's disheartening that a truly revolutionary show has been reduced to a storyline about walking down the aisle with Prince Charming. Newsflash Hollywood: There are so many independent, successful, happy women in America today. Please, just once, respectfully recognize them.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now