I am a professor at KFUPM in the mathematics department studying Randomness. We also have an active teaching program in Probability. I don't know where GrayKat gets his information. KFUPM is a great university with an active research base and bright motivated students. I have taught at large state universities in the USA and KFUPM is comparible in the teaching load given to faculty and support for research.
The King Versus The Radicals
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
Bringing foreigners and foreign ideas into the Saudi heartland is sure to provoke a backlash. "Aramco over time has gotten good with God by greatly reducing the number of infidels working there," Lippman says, referring to efforts to "Saudify" the company in the 1980s after the government took control. "But this university is explicitly going in the opposite direction—it is setting out to bring in infidels, and a lot of them. This is very provocative." The school's zealous egalitarianism will be especially controversial. "I can't stress enough how important gender issues are for the religious factions in society—it really is the third rail of Saudi politics," Gause says. "This is a very emotional issue that will be a flash point once this university opens."
Beyond the symbolism, KAUST's Western-style curriculum is sure to have a profound impact on those who study there. "If you are really going to have a science university that doesn't have a designated purpose—of producing people to do x job or x assignment, the way most Saudi universities are now—that will presumably produce scientists that [will] follow where their research takes them," Lippman says. "Sooner or later, even in the sciences, that will put them against the establishment."
All this comes at a particularly delicate time. In recent years Aramco has started to come under threat from conservative Saudi elements, including some within the company. "There are an increasing number of people at Aramco who are offended by what goes on there," says one member of the Shura Council, the king's powerful consultative body. "You can't screen against these people, and they are changing the face of Aramco." The problem, explains Lippman, is that "the people working at Aramco now, in their mid-30s, came to adulthood in the Saudi Arabia unleashed by King Fahd, who turned the social life of the country over to the fire-and-brimstone absolutists. I would not underestimate the counterforces who are willing to take quite radical measures to prevent alien ideas and unwanted social measures from entering their society."
Liberals are hoping the new university project will advance their cause in the country at large, and inside Aramco as well. "We're in a very patriarchal society that believes strongly in centralization," said al-Husseini, the former Aramco VP. "The challenge is to maintain Aramco's trademark level of dialogue—which has been eroded—and revitalize the tolerant, open, transparent culture."
Aramco tried something similar before, however, and it died in controversy. In the 1960s, Aramco was commissioned to open the King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, an attempt at a Western-style institution for engineers and scientists. But its progressive elements were overturned in 1977, when the school was put under control of the Wahhabi Education Ministry—which fired the female professors and most of the Western staff and mandated religious classes for all students. "You can't hide behind a sand dune along the Red Sea and make a secret university there," says a former administrator at King Fahd University. "Many people in Aramco are frankly scared to death of the Wahhabis. Aramco is not happy about being put in the line of fire, and if King Abdullah is using Aramco to stave off the Wahhabi fundamentalists, that will spell trouble."
Indeed, it would be foolish to bet against the Wahhabis in this current struggle, given that their fundamentalist education system is constantly producing more conservative Saudi youngsters. Abdullah, moreover, is 83, with no clear liberal successor. Still, that may help explain why he's willing to make such a dangerous bet with the country's most precious resource. This might just be the last chance the king gets to institutionalize his progressive legacy and improve the future of his troubled land.
© 2008









Discuss