- 1
- 2
Homebuying 101
For Qiana Johnson, who bought her first home—a studio condo in Chicago's Lakeview neighborhood—earlier this spring, the time spent in prepurchase counseling was well spent. At an evening seminar a real estate attorney, a lending officer and a real estate agent walked participants through the homebuying process. They talked a bit about the risky types of mortgages that "predatory lenders" sometimes offer to naive homebuyers. In her one-on-one session, Johnson and her counselor went over her credit report and talked about issues such as private mortgage insurance payments and how the monthly escrows for taxes and insurance would be different for a house versus a condominium. Johnson, a university librarian, had done a lot of her own homework on homebuying before taking the seminar, so none of this was a revelation. "I heard a lot of things that I knew already, but it was a great kind of reminder," she says.
Does it work? Steven Hornburg is an independent housing consultant who has examined decades' worth of existing research into the programs' effectiveness. He says the research doesn't offer unambiguous proof that buyers who undergo counseling are less likely to have trouble paying their mortgages, but the programs still appear beneficial. "There's not any one piece of research that solidly demonstrates an impact, and there's been very little really solid research done, but a lot of it is suggestive of an impact," he says. More evidence may be coming soon; Hornburg says HUD is currently conducting a long-term study to see how much benefit prepurchase counseling delivers to buyers.
From a buyers' standpoint, however, these programs are a great way to boost your homebuying and mortgage IQ before signing on to the biggest financial commitment of your life. "A lot of the special programs require counseling beforehand, but there are people out there who are going to be applying on the regular market who will benefit from prepurchase counseling," Hornburg says.
Just like getting out of a marriage, getting out of a bad mortgage can be extremely costly, in both financial and emotional terms. It's a commitment best entered into soberly and advisedly, and if counseling helps achieve that, it can be worth spending an evening or two back in the classroom.
Daniel McGinn is a NEWSWEEK national correspondent and the author of " House Lust: Americas Obsession With Our Homes ".
© 2008
- 1
- 2


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: queenie @ 05/22/2008 1:25:32 PM
Comment: Aren't you lucky to have parents that taught you everything you needed to know? Lets DEMAND that everyone be as smart as your parents, RIGHT NOW! ha
Posted By: FirstZebra @ 05/21/2008 6:14:29 PM
Comment: HMMMM ! Sounds like the comments are coming from the NAR folks!
20% down? You mean use your CC's of course!
$100,000 median income?
Probably 80% of American workers cant afford a"home"
Posted By: Thom_Thumb @ 05/21/2008 12:33:06 PM
Comment: There is plenty of blame to go around that caused the present mortgage crisis. Yes, there are dishonest lenders and mortgage brokers, naive customers, and real estate agents that get paid on commission that push buyers to spend more and more. But no one has mentioned the National Board of Realors that is still putting deceptive advertising on national television. The NAR is still calling a home an investment. If a home is an investment then why are they not subject to the same disclosures as an investment house.?. The latest ad that I viewed, stated that the value of the average house goes up over time, so buy a house. Stock brorkers cannot state that the average stock goes up over time, so buy stock. Every equity investment advertisement must give the disclosure that "past performance is not an indicator of future return." So why when the NAR uses the word investment in a housing ad are they exempt from the same disclosures?
Calling houses an investment was the largest fuel to the current crisis. Back in the days when houses were considered to be a "roof over ones head," there were few undercaptialized investors with no business of buying into real estate which drove up housing values for the people that just wanted a place to live. The over inflated housing market, then encouraged mortgage companies to design creative financing to put the perspective homeowners back into the market they were priced out of. It was to the benefit of the NAR to equate houses with investment because the superheated demand drove up prices and, therefore commissions. So if the NAR wants to adverstise like as stock broker then they need to make the same disclosures as a stock broker.