Playing the Spoiler Role?

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Root, a millionaire, Spike TV host and former Las Vegas odds maker, is betting that the Libertarians can make it into the mainstream by attracting gamers. Root says that online poker players soured on the GOP in 2006, after the Republican Congress passed a bill restricting online poker. "There are 12 million poker enthusiasts in this country who had poker ripped away from them in 2006," said Root. "I'm a celebrity in their world. I can bring more gravitas to the [Libertarian Party] than it has ever had before, starting with those 12 million online poker players." Root said that he and Karl Rove—seated at Root's kitchen table one night in 2006—debated the fate of online poker. Root said he told Rove that banning online poker would demoralize the GOP. "Rove said, 'Wayne, that's ridiculous. Poker?'" recalled Root. "Karl Rove laughed, and the Republican revolution ended."

The feisty Root faced some tense moments. At one point he was asked to explain why he had written a $1,000 check for one of Sen. Joe Lieberman's campaigns. Root said the check had been cut as a favor to a business partner who also happened to be a bundler, collecting campaign donations from PACs and individuals for Lieberman. "I'm a businessman above all else," Root explained unapologetically. Later in the debate he complained that the moderator had "put me on the spot." The moderator responded, "That's the point."

But most media interest centered on how much the Barr candidacy could damage McCain. "I don't anticipate being a spoiler," Barr told a gaggle of reporters gathered around him after the debate. "I'm in this race to win. I know it's a long shot, but I'm a competitor, not a spoiler." When asked if McCain was trying to discourage Barr from running, or whether the Arizona senator had reached out to him at all, Barr said, "I don't know that McCain reaches out to anyone, and he certainly hasn't reached out to me. That's not what he's about."

Barr's campaign manager, Russell Verney, who also managed Ross Perot's 1992 presidential campaign, told NEWSWEEK that "those people claiming that [Barr] is going to be a spoiler should buy some cheese to go with that wine. We are not spoiling anything. Competition is the backbone of America. And no one can take votes from anyone else, because votes are not a birthright. Votes have to be earned."

As far as earned votes, it seems that a few may actually be inherited from Ron Paul. For Richard Howard, a registered Republican from outside of Annapolis, Md., Paul's failure to clinch the GOP nomination was terribly disappointing. "I was a Ron Paul supporter," explained Howard before last night's debate. "But he's running as a Republican, and he's not going to make it as a Republican, so that's why I'm here tonight: I am going to look at the Libertarian candidates."

Paul may not have run under the Libertarian name, but he still carried the party's hopes. After the debate, Jon Kraus, a member of Gravel's communications team, chuckled and shook his head. "You know," said Kraus, "you hear his name tossed around as though he were the de facto nominee. Like Ron Paul were the patron saint of Libertarianism." The problem is, it needs one.

© 2008

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: Joe R @ 05/26/2008 9:37:06 PM

    Comment: I do not care what Bob Barr has to say. He has only one objective and that is to get Obama elected.
    Joe Reynolds

  • Posted By: JustAJoe @ 05/24/2008 8:04:49 PM

    Comment: Exactly we should run people for local and Congressional elections. We can win those. As far as being"spoilers", that implies the Republican Party owns people's votes, if they aren't voting Democratic. This is not how it works, but we have been under a duopoly for so long, I can understand that thinking.

    But the minority gets it's say by being a spoiler. If we have a few votes in Congress, we could be the swing vote and stop a lot of nonsense. Ron Paul proved that if you remind people of the principles the country was founded on that made us great, they will respond. The work of the first few in Congress would cause people respond to a type of government they have never seen in their lifetime, an American form of government.

  • Posted By: combsmj @ 05/24/2008 8:55:13 AM

    Comment: Folks, most of us Libertarians are NOT a Republican splinter group. Yes, there are some vocal "one issue Libertarians" (i.e, gun control, religious conservatism, immigration control) which have debate overlap with the Republicans. However, my own 20yrs as a Libertarian has shown me that nearly all Libertarians who act beyond argument and actually vote for Libertarian candidates are ultimately those who support the broader Libertarian platform -- shift from federal to local power, free movement of goods, services and labor (oops MinuteMen) and the efficiencies of free-market management of necessary public-good activities. In short, Libertarian votes will hammer McCain as thoroughly as Obama and Nader. Just keep the wack-jobs who don't vote anyways, off the airwaves.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
PROJECT GREEN

A startup is betting free coffees and groceries will encourage reluctant recyclers.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu