Border Wars

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The Taliban seems to have suffered heavy casualties over the past year and have also lost a lot of midlevel commanders. Is the insurgency now a weakened force?
I would acknowledge that they have lost a large number of leaders. I do believe they have a capacity to replace the leadership that is either captured or killed with new leaders who are fairly agile in re-establishing the network and what their predecessor was doing.

The American military seems to have been successful in negotiating deals with tribal insurgents in Iraq that bring them over to the coalition's side. Is the U.S. military or NATO in Afghanistan also trying to talk to insurgent tribal leaders?
We concentrate on working with tribal leaders who are legitimate in the eyes of the people and those [leaders] who have been appointed by the government at the district and provincial level. We believe that's culturally accurate, because the tribal leaders and the mullahs have positions of authority that go back hundreds of years. We have an elected government at the highest level and an appointed government in the provinces, and we believe that's a good mix. Those are the Afghans we are concentrating on.

But is there any official prohibition to prevent you from talking to Taliban militants?
That's not in my realm to answer. The Afghan government has a peace and reconciliation program. But we do make recommendations [to the government] about people we believe are ready to do that [lay down their arms and join the government's side] if we do run into them one way or the other.

Coalition forces seem to be successful securing formerly Taliban-controlled or threatened areas, but is the government of President Hamid Karzai capable of moving in behind you and providing security and good governance to the people there?
In my short experience the areas that are most secure often have good governance, a capable provincial governor and district subgovernors who know their job and have the capacity to execute that job on a daily basis. So good governance helps bring good security, and it works the other way as well. It's no secret that the way ahead is [providing] good governance, good security and then a reasonable increase in the quality of life for the Afghan people. I do believe we are seeing that in RC-East.

Do you believe, as many people do, that Osama bin Laden is hiding somewhere in your area of operations, perhaps in Kunar province?
That's a superhard question to answer. As you know, each and every day we are doing everything we can to not only help the Afghan people but also to look for the enemies of the Afghan people, and of the rest of the world. Osama bin Laden is one of them. I guarantee you if he is in our area we are going to continue each and every day to try to find him.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Baldy @ 05/25/2008 4:21:35 PM

    I saw the title "Border Wars" and hoped it would be the Mexican/American Border War has escalated to include the Marines, but no way. Uh-uh. Not in America.

    Fools.

  • Posted By: R Lawrence @ 05/24/2008 8:26:58 PM

    What a mess! But, war has always been a mixture of uncontrolled and undefined people vs those with a possible vision of what the situation really is and how to achieve desired goals. However, there is always the spoiler in the environment and in this war it was the neo-cons in Washington, who until the present, have not admitted that they make a huge mistake by leaving Afganistan weak and diverting the military to fight in Iraq. Now we find ourselves in a situation where both wars are draining our capasity to fight effectively and conditions where outside interests are working only on their own personal agendas. In Iraq, Iran is the real winner and in Afganistan, the world's worst terrorist groups are reaping the dividends from a weakened effort by the US and the Allies. Iraq will be, for many years to come, America's economic and military drain. Bush and company should be held responsible, not only by Americans but by the entire world, accountable for their incompitance and complete leadership failures.

  • Posted By: sb0614 @ 05/24/2008 1:25:23 PM

    Pakistani ISI is a two headed monster. First, it wanted a Pakistan friendly Afghanistan,consequently, it nurtured the Taliban in the 90's. We are all quite familiar what happened next - Talibinization of Afghanistan. Mullahs, militants and fundamentalists in the border region like the islamic law. Problem solved. The other head can entirely focus on destabilizing India's Kashmir. Pakistani ISI are readily given the go ahead from the goverment even though they don't need it. Terrorists are recruited and armed. Post 9/11 Pakistan is forced to relinquish its' tight association with the Taliban and show complete support to the US. Taliban goes into hiding in the border region. The US is able to attain some success but, nowhere near complete success. Pakistani ISI want the Pakistan border region left alone and forces Pakistan goverment to come up with an agreement. Incursions will continue, the border will remain volatile, madarassas will 'teach' the young, and terrorists will be recruited. The war will go on!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse