POLITICS

See the Brown in Us

Advice for Obama: Talk to Hispanics as a man who has made his way through black and white America.

Charles Ommanney / Getty Images for Newsweek
On Message: Younger voters have gone Obama's way
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

I hear often enough that America is becoming a post-racial nation. This election season was supposed to prove it. Yet I am struck by the contrary—how mired our politics remain in the dialectic of black and white.

Eight years ago, when John McCain was running against George W. Bush in the South Carolina Republican presidential primary, someone spread a rumor by fax and flier that McCain had fathered a "black" love child. In fact, Cindy McCain had brought a sick girl to America from a Bangladeshi hospital run by Mother Teresa's Missionaries of Charity; the child was later adopted by the McCains. Perhaps the smear artists assumed some voters in South Carolina had never heard of Bangladesh and, in any case, supposed it to be somewhere in Africa. John McCain was defeated. Eight years later, after Barack Obama won the South Carolina Democratic presidential primary, many said that his candidacy was proof that Americans were moving beyond race. Yet notice: the dominant political conversation at the moment contrasts the supposed white working-class diffidence toward Obama against overwhelming black support for him.

To talk about the role of race in this presidential election, it becomes necessary to rehearse the life story of Barack Obama. Is there anyone in America who has not heard it by now? Kansas marries Kenya. But then Obama's father returns to Africa, leaving young Barack in Hawaii. The boy grows to manhood (among white women), returns to the mainland and places himself squarely within the black community of Chicago. From his fractured life, Obama has constructed an oratory of reconciliation—this has been his remarkable song to America.

What interests me about Obama is the fact that he identifies himself as an "African-American." Indeed, most Americans refer to Barack Obama as the first serious "black" candidate for president. I realize that for African-Americans there has often been no option: they've been denied the possibility of mixture by the Jim Crow alchemy. "One drop" of African blood made you black no matter how light your skin or straight your hair or complicated your lineage.

Is it possible, I wonder, after centuries of slavery and injury, after illicit eroticism between black and white, after lynchings, and children who had to choose between one parent or another … is it possible to say brown? Barack Obama is brown. Mixed. There are millions of us in America who similarly belong to more than one race. There are millions of us who belong to contending races or religions or tribes.

Brown is not a new color to America. Our past is as brown as our future. Indeed, Americans are paying to have their DNA appraised and they are discovering that their family's past was browner than any grandparent led them to suppose. Tiger Woods is the hero of the brown era dawning in America. He calls himself "Cablinasian," to acknowledge the Caucasian-European, African, American Indian and Asian within him.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: J.Richter @ 05/30/2008 1:07:20 AM

    (8). His make up as one from multiple backgrounds and his actions - never actually disparaging his opponents as when he defended HC on Bosnia makes it believable that he might be able to bring people together compared to those that think fighting is a virtue.
    (9). He has gotten it right more often recently than his opponents - on what would happen in Iraq, to his judgment on Pakistan, and to now the gas tax which even republican economists agreed was bad policy and also Bloomberg called stupid.
    - Yes he has made mistakes but they are all consistent with the overall personality that is emerging by his own testimony and not the words of others (including the mistake of giving Wright a chance to sting him by including him in the general discourse on race in America, being too soft on HC in debates and not attacking in kind or using her scandals against her, or in trying to psychoanalyze or explain why rural voters might not be supporting him with the bitter gaffe). One thing at least you can evaluate what you have in front of you more than the more ???experienced??? or dishonest politicians.

  • Posted By: J.Richter @ 05/30/2008 12:59:17 AM

    Your own brother wouldnt defend you. You started it. That was your sense of humor?

  • Posted By: J.Richter @ 05/30/2008 12:50:47 AM

    Look putting race aside. I sincerely believe this man is the best qualified of the current set. The reasons are not race based and I welcome any argument or agreement based on SUBSTANCE:
    (1). He has the sufficient experience. Some have said he doesnt have enough. I invite all to review the performance of the very experienced in Washington. They become entrenched in the process and mistakes - the power structure, interest groups and lobbyists and are no longer able to subconsciously or consciously operate in a manner dependent of these methods which are eventually detrimental to the nation. His 'little experience' saw him voting for a gas tax in Illinois, and later against it after it came back for renewal and studies showed it didnt work.
    (2). Apparently also from above he learns from experience
    (3). He is sufficiently brilliant. Both BO an editor of Havard law review and Hillary a Rhode scholar can not be accused of probably being unable to grasp some of the sometimes expert concepts of strategy, policy, governance, and economics that we want in the next president given our current situation. McCain was a noted C student as was GW whose family name appears to have even followed him to college (both are from very successful parentage and I will not label anyone elite here).
    (4). He is a better executive (judging from his management and putting together his campaign) than the other two who started off with entrenched party advantages.
    (5). He is a better grassroots organizer as evidenced by how he built a resilient grassroot support that has sustained him till today (maybe this comes from better understanding of organizational dynamics from his community organizer days).
    (6). He apparently has a better world view. Haven lived abroad for a few years, he appears to be able to combine a full world view with an American one as a 20 year public servant. We might be surprised what more negotiation and carrot and stick can accomplish for our public policy and if he selects a proven 'tough' VP, even scared hawks should be willing to give a slightly different approach a try. Why would anyone want to continue our current killing (on both sides) policies. There are indeed women and children dying in Iraq as there are in Iran which we might TOTALLY OBLITERATE if their leaders misact. The folks in WTC were totally innocent people who crazy folks refused to distinguish from our military or rulers and I believe we are who we are because we are BETTER and should continue to act in this manner.
    (7). HE has the right temperament. Whether praised, attacked, or endorsed he has shown me an even and measured temperament. Unlike opponents who have been known to strike colleagues physically or those that act like Jekyll and Hyde - hot one day and cold another - screaming shame on you one day (on apparently truthful representation of their falsified history on NAFTA) and turning dove the next.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
COVER STORY

Given his successes, it's easy to argue that Barack Obama doesn't need advice. But how he'll handle race going forward is by no means a settled issue. Our open letter.