Hillary, You Didn’t Win. Now Don’t Whine

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: jonstorm @ 05/30/2008 10:59:19 PM

    Questions for Obama supporters.

    I know many of you say Clinton lost your vote when she authorized the use of force in Iraq.

    Can you deny that democracy in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan and now Nepal are good things? Can you deny that this war on terror is spreading democracy and making is safe to democracy to sprout in countries that want it? Didn't JFK say we would "pay any price and bear any burden", yet Obama's claim to fame is that he was against this war.

  • Posted By: andrew.9 @ 05/30/2008 6:57:17 PM

    THOSE WOMEN GOING TO WASHINGTON ARE GOING TO SHOW JUST HOW WHINEY AND EMOTIONAL WOMEN CAN BE. IT WILL SET US BACK DECADES. THESE WOMEN ARE FOOLISH, EXTREMIST FOLLOWING THEIR MESSIAH. WHA T THEY DON'T REALIZE IS THAT HILLARY IS NOT THE WOMEN WE WANT. SHE HAS SHOWN US THAT LIEING,CRYING,WHINING,CHANGING THE TRUTH TO MEET YOUR NEEDS AND EXPLOITING POOR UNEDUCATED PEOPLE IS O.K. I THINK SHE IS A DISGRACE. SHE IS NO ROLE MODEL FOR MY GRANDCHILDREN. THESE ARE THE VALUES AND MORALS THESE WOMAN ARE GOING TO SUPPORT. SHAME ON THEM!!!!

    • Posted By: tired and old @ 05/30/2008 10:58:11 PM

      WOMENS LIB. CARRIES A HEAVY BURDEN.

      HILLARY FOR HILLARY.

      BRA BURNERS NEED A DEFENDER, THEY PICK HILLARY OVER HONOR.

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 05/30/2008 7:14:11 PM

    If it wasn't so embarrasing, that a known crook and fraud (not to mention named HUSSEIN) was on the verge of representing such, a large portion of the American public, HolyRoller would be rolling on the floor laughing. Can't stop chuckling as it is.

    Hillary's defenders are protesting loudly. The media is doing its best, to spin the view that Hussein could defeat McCain(LAUGHABLE). Hussein is pissed and sweatin'. At least when he isn't showing off his erection to the camera(YouTube and NASTY). His former ridin' partner Larry Sinclair and his attn. Montgomery Sibley, have called a press conference. This is better than Sex and the City.

    Sinclair is about to have his day in the Sun. The can is off the worms(no pun intended). AND The Chosen One had better pray to Allah that good buddy, Tony the Syrian doesn't get convicted. CAUSE if he does, he will be facing 30 yrs. Fed Time. It will be time to sing like a canary. And we all know whose name will be mentioned prominently.

    My grin just turned into a full smile.

    NOBAMA!!!


    • Posted By: tired and old @ 05/30/2008 7:26:36 PM

      JOHN Mc CAIN BEING CARRIED TO THE PODIUM TO GET PRESIDENCY ?

      NOT BEING ABLE TO REPEAT THE WORDS.

      DEMENTIA ! NOT A PRETTY SIGHT --------------- REALLY !

      • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 05/30/2008 7:49:22 PM

        EXPERIENCE AND WISDOM
        or
        INEXPERIENCE AND FOOLISHNESS

        RIGHTEOUS ANGER
        or
        SILLY LITTLE SISSY

        VICTORY AND PRIDE
        or
        SURRENDER AND SHAME

        PERSONAL FREEDOM
        or
        GOVT. MANDATES

        STRENGTH
        or
        WEAKNESS

        CHARACTER AND HONOR
        or
        CROOK AND FRAUD

        A mohammed in the White House??? God Forbid. And He has....

        NOBAMA!!!

        • Posted By: tired and old @ 05/30/2008 10:54:42 PM

          HOLY !

          INEXPERIENCED, LESS EDUCATED, NEEDS TO GET OUT MORE, SISSY MAN, HOMO.

          HOLY ? NOT REALLY ! JUST ANOTHER GAY BLADE LOOKING FOR LOVE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES.

  • Posted By: jessix01 @ 05/30/2008 6:50:01 PM

    Hey, I didn't break any rules. I voted the way I am supposed to vote. Why should my vote not count? Since when does a "super delegate" have a more meaningful vote than an American citizen? Ever hear "one person, one vote"?

    Perhaps this is so unless one is a Democrat and "Super delegates" have the right and the vote to select the candidate to run (and usually lose) for President! I object to "super" anything having a more meaningful vote than my own vote. Why should another person get to determine who will run for office and who I may vote for? This gives new meaning to "one person one vote" in my book. Lately even this must have been too threatening to those super delegates selecting our candidates. They have taken away the meaning of my vote claiming it was made at the wrong time in the wrong place. They in turn will determine the "right" person" after removing my vote from the records for some trumped up reasoning.

    Won't we ever get angry at the removal of our rights and freedoms? When will we fight to retain our right to vote for our candidates and not to accept those selected by "super" delegates, who I understand are responsible for this entire fiasco where the voters of FL and MI have been disenfranchised?

    Democrats are doing their best to lose this Presidential election just as they managed to lose the last 7 of 9! Only a Clinton triumphed twice amidst a bunch of losers. Our Dems are trying their best to pick the next loser, going against polls which clearly show which candidate will do the best against the Republican opposition in 2008. Are we to accept one more time "it's not winning that counts but how one plays the game?" What a bunch of loser bull-crap!

    Pick the best candidate for a change and give the Dems a chance to win an election when it counts.

    • Posted By: Mimi13 @ 05/30/2008 10:20:26 PM

      One more time -- voting rights do not enter into the picture when you are talking about a political party primary. According to the Supreme Court, a political party is a PRIVATE CLUB, kind of like the Moose or the Chamber of Commerce. As a PRIVATE CLUB, a party has the right to set any rules it chooses to determine who gets to come to it big national convention. It can choose delegatges by elections, or caucuses, or conventions. It can draw names out of a hat, if it likes. Now, the way you can get a little bit of leverage over the situation is through the elected members of state and national government who belong to the party of your choice. They are among the people making the rules. They are vulnerable because they need your vote. If you think the process for selecting a nominee for president from the Democratic Party stinks, let your elected representatives know -- all of them -- not just senators and congress members-- but all those other people who get elected in your state to hold office. Judges, too, if you live in a state that elects judges on a partisan ballot. These are all people who ARE the super delegates this year. They are also the people who will begin to write the rules for the 2012 primaries starting in August at the National Convention in Denver. Let them know what you don't like. Let them know what you want different. Be specific -- it's so much more effective that just writing "you stink!" Your letters will accomplish two things. First, you may come up with an idea that hasn't been considered yet. Or, you may lend support to an idea that is in the hopper. In either case, having a stack of letters demanding change will give these elected officials some ammunition to go to the state legislatures and get the state laws needed to make change. So, minimize this message board. Open your word processing program. Write a letter. Go to your state government website and get the addresses for Democratic elected officials, as well as your state and national senators and congress people. Print off your letter and send it. You will feel much better and I guarantee that no one will write back and call you nasty names. On these message boards, you can't get a guarantee like that.

  • Posted By: HarleyH @ 05/30/2008 10:12:05 PM

    Hey John, I know Holy is mis-guided, I've seen the US weapons inspectors report and it's not uncommon for rightwinger to think any "media" not owned by Murdock, is "liberal" or would be deceiving the public, we know better, I mean if she really wanted to know could probably get something from BBC news or other sources, maybe C-SPAN even.
    So even though Holy is "lost", I don't think that means she does'nt love her country, just does'nt know how to stop the 'ABUSE".

  • Posted By: therookie @ 05/30/2008 9:38:00 PM

    Thank you. I clearly can't understand, as a 57 year old White woman, how Obama could possibly have been encouraged to stejp up and decry the media's bad press for Hillary, when she was in a campaign contest. Ferraro's criticism of Obama for not intervening (she has a husband as wel, who didn't until just now) when he was chided for getting her chair, I can't blame him. I sure don't know the rules or the lay of the land what is expected of Obama in these cases. I think he is a scapegoat personally, but I have tried to understand it from Clintons' viewpoint. I simply can't make sense of it. Hillary proved to have more than enough cajonies for anyone to handle herself and so to now come off as a victim is I don't know,just weird.

  • Posted By: Mimi13 @ 05/30/2008 9:23:41 PM

    I've said on these boards exactly what Clift says in this article. Clinton's first and worst mistake was voting for the war in Iraq. It had nothing to do with race or sex. It had to do with voting against the interests of this country for political advantage -- she was afraid she would get hammered for being soft on defense in the general; she didn't anticipate the strength of the sentiment against the war. By voting for the war, she handed Obama the issue that launched his campaign. Without that issue, the Obama campaign would never have gotten any traction. It was the war that drew in the college kids who turned out in legions for him in Iowa and got out the vote. It was his stand on the war that brought him to the attention of the parents of those kids. Clinton blew it big time with her vote. The second problem is that she just ran a piss poor campaign -- no money management, no extended strategy, no focus on the causus states (so much for "count every state and every vote). She expected a coronation and when it didn't turn out that way, she cried "foul." But there were no fouls -- Obama's campaign has had its glitches, but he's kept himself on the right side of the rules. The best the Clinton campaign could come up with is that he ran campaign ads in Florida -- but they were national ads, he asked that they not be played in Florida but was told that was not possible with a national buy, and he sought the permission of the South Carolina national primary (the supposed injured party in this case) before he okayed the placement. IF Clnton had had the guts to run in 2004, she probably would have been elected and we'd be talking about her second term this year. But she didn't want to run against a sitting president. She played it safe. She decided this was her year. But she was wrong.

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 05/30/2008 9:16:41 PM

    Obamamohammeds want this as Commander-In-Chief???? We have a bunch of whackjobs on the left.....

    Launched a week prior, on May 23, 2008, Vets for Freedom PAC (VFFPAC) released its first political ad entitled "Senator Obama: Talk to Commanders or Meet with Dictators?" which stated that Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) never sat down even one time and talked one-on-one with Gen. David Petraeus, the U.S. Commander in Iraq, although he has stated that he would be willing to meet without precondition the leaders of terrorist countries like Iran.

    YA'LL AIN'T SEEN NOTHIN' YET....Kerry swiftboats gonna look like little rubber duckies.......

    NOBAMA!!!

  • Posted By: soundiata @ 05/30/2008 9:14:33 PM

    Let's face the truth: Hillary Clinton is still behind until the DNC decide what to do with florida and Michigan. Until then, Obama leads in delegates, superdelagates, the number of states won, and the popular vote so far ! Will michigan and florida be fully awarded to Hillary? I doubt so, since she agreed before the primary to penalise those to states for breaking the rules. Therefore, the popular vote argument is a smoke screen. Hillary is still in the race to show how powerful they("Billary") still are in the democratic party, dispite slitly losing to a new comer from nowhere named Barack Obama. Unless the party leaders supporting Obama recognize that and reward it ( a VP spot or chairman of the DNC, or sanate leadership), the clintons will remain a barrage to barack nomination.

  • Posted By: lastjournaliststanding @ 05/30/2008 4:42:30 PM

    GET READY. MCCAIN HAS A SECRET V.P. LIST. ON THE TOP OF THE LIST IS OLYMPIA SNOWE.

    • Posted By: Mimi13 @ 05/30/2008 9:09:04 PM

      Olympia Snowe who co-sponsored the bill to withdraw from Iraq? Olympia Snowe who is for abortion rights and gay rights? Olympia Snowe who voted against the Bush tax cuts, NAFTA and CAFTA? Olympia Snowe whose legislative agenda includes gun control, lower rates for student loans and government funding for child care? That Olympia Snowe? NEVER HAPPEN. Not with McCain. But Maybe Obama would find her interesting.

  • Posted By: not_another_american_idiot @ 05/30/2008 8:17:22 PM

    OMG!!!! HDavidson:

    A) Another irony, how can Obama argue rules, rules, rules, when his whole campaign is based on "change, change, change," can you say hypocrite, I think so.

    B) "Black guy getting white votes..." You need serious therapy because this is the most paranoid propaganda I have read in a while. We live in a democracy where EVERY vote is supposed to be counted and thus Hillary has a valid argument.

    C) Politics is all about winning, no matter what side you are on. Obama is just as guilty as Hillary when it comes to doing whatever it takes to get nominated, that's just the nature of the game sweety. It is important that delegates and especially supers pay attention to who will win in the fall because if we don't win and we put someone in there that isn't ready, which is what many of us (dem and republican alike) think of Obama, then all of this was for nothing!!!


    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 05/30/2008 8:33:55 PM

      Obama is the nominee. He won fair and square. Get over it.

      • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 05/30/2008 8:50:42 PM

        As of this moment he is NOT the nominee.

        NOBAMA!!!

  • Posted By: patter @ 05/30/2008 8:44:34 PM

    I love the e-trade commercial with the little kid who says,"I underestimated the creepiness of the clown". Well, I must say that I too underestimated the creepiness of the Clowns - I mean the Clintons. Hopefully she (Hillary) and he (bill) will show some class this week and acknowledge and support the most qualified candidate - Barack Obama.

  • Posted By: MoeWesley @ 05/30/2008 3:45:04 PM

    I see that "whine" is today's neolib talking point...what "mushroom cloud" was to the neocons in the runup to the Iraq War.

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 05/30/2008 3:51:57 PM

      Nobody likes a whiner, no matter how legitimate their point.

      • Posted By: MoeWesley @ 05/30/2008 4:24:22 PM

        my point exactly; no one likes mushroom clouds either...same tactic, different issue.

        • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 05/30/2008 4:30:24 PM

          Ever heard of a non sequitur? You might want to look it up.

          • Posted By: MoeWesley @ 05/30/2008 4:50:07 PM

            over your head?...it's okay...nevermind. Say 50 "yes we cans" and a novena and everything will be just fine. "There are those who hope for rain, and there are those who build viaducts."
            ( It's okay, really, just insult me again...you'll feel all better)

            • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 05/30/2008 5:03:53 PM

              I was kind to you. I could have ripped into your analogy for it's absolute irrelevance and inaptness. I didn't. Instead, I opted for a subtle form of education. Of course, anyone who uses the term 'neolib' is probably beyond help.

              • Posted By: MoeWesley @ 05/30/2008 5:36:00 PM

                I truly wish you were as smart as you think you are. You could really be helpful. Unfortunately I've read your other posts, so...not so much. Thanks for continuing to prove my points, though. Truth is, I don't even need to reply, just sit back and enjoy watching you spin yourself into the ground. The ego is a bit embarrassing, but other than that...great entertainment! Thanks.

                • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 05/30/2008 6:15:53 PM

                  Exactly. If you had a point, you'd state it. You made the ill-advised analogy and as yet have not made your point. I simply called you out on it. Now, you want to take your ball and go home. Boo hoo. No wonder you have been defending Clinton's similar behavior.

                  • Posted By: MoeWesley @ 05/30/2008 6:52:05 PM

                    Precious.

                    • Posted By: MoeWesley @ 05/30/2008 7:22:34 PM

                      "If I thought you gave a rat's behind about anything in any of your posts other than smacking down your perceived opponent, I would try to explain to you what I meant by my "ill-advised analogy."(do you ever listen to yourself?) However, it is evident that you don't. Therefore, accuse me of any behavior you can come up with in your malevolent little imagination and tie it into a Hill-slam as you do throughout this blog to your hearts content. I am through with you.

                      • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 05/30/2008 8:43:42 PM

                        It was your analogy. It's your job to explain it. The fact that you've neglected to indicates that it's unexplainable. You're right about my style. I used to post op-ed style refutations of nutjobs regularly. What I found was the most beautiful piece of logic, lovingly crafted, will simply be dismissed by the loonies of this world without the slightest attempt at a valid refutation. Because of that, I stopped wasting my time and turned to being snarky instead. It works much better and it's a style of rhetoric that righties understand, because they've spent many years honing it on the left. Well, it's time to fight fire with fire.

  • Posted By: DSRoberts @ 05/30/2008 1:55:10 PM

    The ignorance of so many Obama's supporters and the Obama media is that they believe it's a "woman thing"; that women are supporting Hillary because she is the woman in the race. Hillary's supporters are so impassioned because they know she is the most qualified candidate. We have seen in these last 8 years what a majority of stupid voters can do to our country.And now we have a bare majority of the same kind of ignorant voters supporting Obama. And if he manages to win, (which he won't because we promise to kneecap him!),we could have a 4 year continuance of stupidity and inexperience!Why do you ,tough luck, want such a thing?

    • Posted By: Canada's Watching @ 05/30/2008 2:00:47 PM

      So, you're going to "kneecap" him. Brilliant. Vote Republican because the country is doing just great!

      • Posted By: USAlady @ 05/30/2008 8:06:49 PM

        The sad truth is, that if HRC is nominated, many will not vote, not only African Americans but youth, whites and 1st time voters. If HRC is not nominated, many old white women women will not vote for Obama. McCain has it made because of Hillary & her followers STUPIDITY and selfishness!! Obama won fair and square, get over it !! If Hillary would have won the nomination I would support her, but not at this point, she has "torn her draws" with me for good.

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 05/30/2008 2:38:51 PM

      Some Hillary supporters are reinforcing stereotypes of women as not-serious when they admit to voting for Clinton because she's a woman. I thought women were better than this. Fortunately, a significant portion are not voting their vagina and instead are supporting Obama.

    • Posted By: Heartlight3 @ 05/30/2008 2:30:07 PM

      If it's not a "woman thing" then why are Hillary supporter yelling so loud about "sexism". I never have seen sexism as an issue in this campaign (and I am a 61 year old white woman) but these last couple of weeks, Hillary supporters have been stomping around yelling "sexism at the top of their voices. You can't have it both ways. If Obama's supporters ignorantly believe it's a "woman thing" It's because Hillary supporters say so.

  • Posted By: pugs @ 05/30/2008 7:40:01 PM

    You know that same title could have been written about Gore in 2000 and I don't think so . This is America and we have the freedom to seek the American dream so just let her fight media. From a Floridian that fought in 2000 and still fights to have our votes counted, I just didn't think we would be fighting our own party for that "luxury" .......I mean that American right!!!

    • Posted By: HDavidson @ 05/30/2008 8:02:36 PM

      As is obvious, it's not counting votes that is the issue, it is the RULES being broken, RULES that everybody agreed to and that includes Hillary, her signature is on the paper too. Same as in 2000 it was not that votes were not counted, it's that the RULES OF A RECOUNT WERE IGNORED, where were the RULES ignored? FLORIDA!!! They seem to have a problem following rules there and then wanting a break on their failure. Hillary did not CARE AT ALL until she realized the BLACK guy was getting WHITE votes...
      Now she wants "ALL" votes counted, and by "ALL" she means the popular vote, right? Everybody counts every voice heard, right? WRONG!! She does not want to count the popular vote from the caucus states, but why? I thought she and her followers said "EVERY VOICE, ALL VOTES!!!" Answer: If you count the popular votes from caucus states, Hillary's math get's shot, and then it is Barack who who won "THE MOST VOTES EVER!!"...lol

      It's not about the count, it's about the RULES!! We are not Republicans, who say "SCREW THE RULES, WE JUST WANT TO WIN!!"

      Think on these things ;)

  • Posted By: not_another_american_idiot @ 05/30/2008 7:55:14 PM

    It is sooo ironic to me how hypocritical Obama supporters are!!! You cry racism, racism, racism, yet all that comes out of YOUR mouths is filth and prejudice!!! To educate all of you self-centered idiots, African-Americans are not the only people who face discrimination. Women do to it's called, ready sound it out with me s-e-x-i-s-m, which you have all demonstrated time and time again in your Hillary bashing for no other reason than she is a woman and now I am reading Obama supporters making prejudice remarks about McCain's age, this is ready, big word here, called A-G-E-I-S-M!!! Now remove blinders please, everyone should be given a fair chance regardless of SEX, AGE, RACE, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, etc.

    I know many strong, successful, intelligent women that have the potential to be leaders just like Mrs. Clinton. I know this is intimidating for many of you ignorant out there but please catch up to the times. In addition, with the rise of ready here we go another big word for you t-e-c-h-n-o-l-o-g-y people are living long and healthy lives well into their 100's. I took a gerontology class my last semester of undergrad and I have seen MANY examples of successful aging!!!

    I truly feel sorry for the egotism and ignorance of so many out there!!!


  • Posted By: tired and old @ 05/30/2008 7:22:01 PM

    TOMORROW ! TOMORROW ! ITS ONLY A DAY AWAY.

    PACK YOUR BAGS YOU WICKED WITCH.

  • Posted By: wheresclair @ 05/30/2008 7:11:51 PM

    A MUST watch for those interested in the DNC's Rules Committee meeting!
    http://www.youtube.com/v/ZAu39I5QOUc

  • Posted By: dwinfrey9 @ 05/30/2008 2:47:19 PM

    I live in Michigan and I don't feel disenfranchised. Everyone knew what the rules were. Many people didn't bother to vote because it was clear that the vote wouldn't count. I'm pretty in touch with Michigan politics. And, there's no outcry here about this disenfranchisment claim. This is Clinton politcs being played.

    • Posted By: MoeWesley @ 05/30/2008 3:23:00 PM

      You don't have to live in Michigan or Florida to know that voters turned out (minus you, of course) in record numbers in Michigan and Florida knowing that THEY had not moved the primary and insisting on participating in the democratic process. Surely you don't believe your decision to stay home should be binding on over 2 million voters in 2 states? This is Obama narcissism being played.

      • Posted By: dwinfrey9 @ 05/30/2008 3:32:19 PM

        Sorry, you're wrong. I and many other voted. We voted uncommitted. But, some people didn't bother. Rules are rules. Put down the Clinton Kool-aid.

        • Posted By: MoeWesley @ 05/30/2008 4:20:56 PM

          Have you read "the rules?" Obama broke the rules by running ads in Michigan urging you to vote uncommitted, and by running ads in Florida and giving a September press conference.
          Gravel wasn't on the ballot? Kucinich wasn't on the ballot?
          You missquote, cherrypick and bend "the rules" to favor Obama amidst a chorus of approval from a liberal talk radio I can barely distinguish anymore from Radio Limbaugh in tone and bias. Give me a break.

          • Posted By: MoeWesley @ 05/30/2008 4:29:39 PM

            According to "the rules" Obama-- having broken "the rules" in both states,--isn't entitled to any of their delegates. You don't care about "the rules." Rave on...I'm out.

            • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 05/30/2008 5:06:54 PM

              You are incorrect. It was Hillary who campaigned in Florida and refused to remove her name from the ballot in Michigan. She wants her cake and eat it to. Fortunately, she won't get her way.

              • Posted By: MoeWesley @ 05/30/2008 6:26:21 PM

                She appeared at a fundraiser--an allowed activity under the rules--appearing after the polls closed, going the extra mile. He ran ads on tv covering most of the Florida market--disallowed by the rules--gave a September 30 impromtu press c onference--disallowed by the rules--and team Obama ran ads in Michigan encouraging voters to vote uncommitted, ie "against Hillary." What is the matter with you?

                • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 05/30/2008 6:32:08 PM

                  What is the matter with you? The FL and MI votes are tainted no matter what happens. A revote should have occurred, but since none happened they should be thrown out or the delegates split 50/50.

                  • Posted By: MoeWesley @ 05/30/2008 7:08:15 PM

                    TEAM OBAMA BLOCKED A REVOTE IN THE MICHIGAN LEGISLATURE. What would you have me say now "I know you are but what am I?"

      • Posted By: dwinfrey9 @ 05/30/2008 3:45:47 PM

        Since my candidate of choice, Obama, followed the DNC rules, we couldn't officially register a vote for him. (His name wasn't on the ballot). Thus, the choice to vote "uncommitted" was all that we had. We wanted to make it clear that we weren't supporting Hillary. By the way, she was the only Dem, who didn't comply with the spirit of the DNC rules. All of the others removed their names. She seems to make up her rules as she goes along. She reminds me of Bush in that regard -- poor presidential material. Her way or the highway. E.g. "If you count the votes the way I count them...." Sheeeesh, is this really what you want leading the country -- someone who just makes it up as she goes along? Sad. Sad. Sad.

        Get over this woman thing...it's not because she's a woman. It's about Hillary. She's the problem.

        Your apparent candidate of choice broke the rules. She's now trying to rewrite them. She's a sore loser.

  • Posted By: Thevail @ 05/30/2008 6:57:33 PM

    HolyTroller...you couldn't think your way out of Republican paper bag.
    How can we tell it's republican you ask?

    It costs way too much.
    It's made in a foreign country with NO quality control.
    It assumes it's morally superior to all other paper bags.
    4100 soldiers died to keep the paper bag safe.
    There was a $14,000.00 shipping charge for haliburton to deliver it.

    And in the end...There was nothing in it!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse