COMMENTARY

Not So Sweet

Why Dunkin' Donuts shouldn't have caved in the controversy over Rachael Ray's 'kaffiyeh' scarf.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: DJNASCARFAN @ 06/02/2008 10:42:59 AM

    I think its about time that someone OTHER THAN the American People! We AS true Americans have been forced to remove so many things that are actually important to us, our culture, history etc because it "offended" someone of another race/culture. If folks come to the "good ole USA" for a better life, they should do so LEGALLY and not expect that the USA change to accomodate them! We are forced to just turn our heads & accept looking at their flags, slogans, language etc regardless of if we are offended by it or not. However if these folks even hint at being offended by OUR flags, slogans, language, traditions certian folks trip all over themselves to make them happy. If they are not happy with OUR way of life, traditions, history etc. then they should GO BACK HOME!

    • Posted By: patton434 @ 06/02/2008 11:50:50 AM

      If you burn a Iranian, Mexican, or or Palestinian flag, it is considered a hate crime and you can go to jail - and rightfully so of course! But with that in mind, why is it not considered a hate crime to burn the American Flag in front of Americans??!! Try going to Saudi Arabia and burn their flag... see how long it takes for you to get shot and killed by the police. My father went Saudi Arabia on business, and was almost arrested right at the airport for wearing a (small) Cross around his neck!! I don't think the people from these countries should be complaining about us!!

      • Posted By: WishStone @ 02/19/2009 4:23:55 PM

        I am rather certain that burning a flag here in the US IS a crime.
        You compare two different cultures which is why your argument sadly fails to reach the desired outcome, at least with me.

        Their laws do not apply to us, so why should our laws apply to them? I for certain would not want to have certain laws where I live. In France public radio MUST broadcast a certain percentage of french-sung songs. Oh, and nothing wrong with that, they have some great artists. And it also promotes the language of that nation. Germany does not have a similar law... and I am not sure if I would like having it myself...

        • Posted By: Haruspex @ 04/10/2009 1:57:28 AM

          I guess you know very little about US law. In the Supreme Court case Texas vs. Johnson, Justice William Brennan wrote for a five-justice majority in holding that the defendant's act of flag burning was protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

          In easy words for you since I'm "pretty sure" you're an idiot... flag burning is legal. It is protected by the First Amendment.

          Maybe next time you'll think before typing out your bull.

        • Posted By: Haruspex @ 04/10/2009 1:55:29 AM

          Apparently you know nothing about US law. In the Supreme Court case Texas vs. Johnson (1990), Justice William Brennan wrote for a five-justice majority in holding that the defendant's act of flag burning was protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

          In easy words for idiots like you, burning the flag is legal. It is protected by the First Amendment.

          Maybe next time you'll think before typing.

  • Posted By: bones024567 @ 06/02/2008 10:35:10 AM

    Lorraine,

    Keep your burka on. Yes, Duncan Donuts over-reacted, especially since they weren't displaying any sign of Christian symbolism and therefore were in no danger of being litigated out of existence by the ACLU, but your rant nevertheless sounds shrill, almost hysterical. The bloggers you cited may be reaching a bit in going after Duncan Donuts. I don't know Rachael Ray's political views, and she may or may not harbor sympathies for palestinian terrorists (remember Jane Fonda?), and if she does, then the kaffiyeh would likely be making a statement that Duncan Donuts would rightly find inappropriate.

    The relevant substance of your article comprised about three or four sentences at the beginning. After that, you lapsed into the usual liberal boilerplate dogma about how the fascist racist conservative bloggers hate Arabs and muslims etc, etc, etc. Lorraine, try to get beyond your shallow, socialist-brainwashed, what-have-we-done-to-make-them-hate-us-so-much cultural relativism for a moment and consider this: Islam is at war with the west. Main-line muslim clerics in most countries of the world publicly declare it. The Koran declares it. 1300+ years of muslim & Arab history declare it. Think, nowhere in the world today, nor for hundreds of years past, have Christians killed anyone in the name of their religion. No other world religion today preaches or practices murder, terror, or subjugation of "unbelievers", other than Islam. Oh, you say the "religion of peace" has been hijacked by a few radicals? WRONG. The Koran, Hadith, and over 1300 years of historical precedent prove your point of view wrong. When you have studied Islam and read the "sacred" writings as I have, then you will be qualified to say something on the subject. Until then, your writings on the subject are nothing more than regurgitation of PC liberal crap, deaf, blind and dangerously naive to the reality of the world we live in.

    • Posted By: darth.dims @ 06/02/2008 10:58:03 AM

      another very narrow minded point of view here. Being a Roman catholic working in a muslim country and see the harmony of those of the east and west really opens your eyes to a lot of things. The word Islam itself means Peace.

      Get off your brainwashing and come down to a Muslim country like the United Arab Emirates to see how hospitable and considerate the people here are. They don't jump at the display of crosses or frown upon the various religions here unlike you seem to. From this reaction alone I wonder if living in America is so much better with people like you. Luckily I've met and know a number of good American people to know otherwise.

      These wars are not in the name of religion but the intepretation of it by some strong willed personalities and the media frenzy. But if you really want to go back in history: How on earth did you forget the crusades in the last 1300 years and didn't forces in the name of Christianity encroach into Arab lands to pillage and murder?

      • Posted By: arkitek @ 03/12/2009 12:24:18 PM

        I hate to pick faults, but Islam does not mean Peace. It derives, by all accounts, from an Arabic word meaning 'submission'. A Muslim, therefore, is 'one who submits'.
        You are free to claim Islam as a peaceful religion, I make no comment on that front, but please refrain from using false etymology.

      • Posted By: patton434 @ 06/02/2008 11:58:04 AM

        Yes, there are some exceptions, but in just about every other Muslim-based country (with the exception of Turkey, and maybe one or two others), it is considered a crime to publicly display symbols of Christianity, or Judaism. My father was almost arrested at right at the airport in Saudi Arabia (went there for business) because he was wearing a cross around his neck. The only reason he wasn't arrested was because he did some name-dropping - but they still confiscated it. Yes, there are "some" countries where Muslims and Christians exist in harmony, but that is the exception, not the norm.

        • Posted By: WishStone @ 02/19/2009 4:18:45 PM

          You'd be amazed what terrible crimes can happen in Turkey.
          Just like terrible crimes can happen in American prisoner camps...
          It is the number of things that happen and how the outside world perceives them. The mistreatment of captives by US troops fed a flurry of anti-Americanism in all of Europe for example. Just like Congress tried to push 'Freedom Fries'.

          Me, I am German. We have a high population of people from the general Turkish area. Visit a regular families home sometime. Whenever I would go home to visit friends, I was treated... well, polite to the point I felt uncomfortable. Mothers not resting unless they found SOMETHING they could do to make me feel welcomed (I ended up politely asking for tea and maybe some sweets to ensure they felt they did what they could to treat their guest right.)

  • Posted By: Annapalooza @ 06/02/2008 11:17:12 AM

    I refuse to boycott Dunkin' Donuts. Especially over a PAISLEY scarf. How dumb is that?!?!

    I think the problem is that there are people out there, including some of the commenters here, who cannot, or refust to read or gather all of the facts before allowing their blood to boil. Dunkin' Donuts should not have caved in once they determined the scarf was not a "kaffiyeh." When people people of good will allow every rabid dissenter to make public policy, we all move further along the road to chaos.

    • Posted By: seanw3 @ 06/02/2008 11:58:22 AM

      yes I agree , look at liberal policies for the last thirty years and then tell me that we havent let every rabid dissenter form public policy.. wha you thought it was manily Republicans.. look again and do some research.

      The bulk of the change has been from liberals.. We have just sat back and taken it, especially because people who are the dissenters attach anything they want changed racist even when it is not and that gets all the sheep to follow in line. Illegal aliens rights and ability to steal your Social Security # and it is not against the law, welfare, the new deal, any mention of the Christian religon, the seperation of Church and State as a law that was written in the Constitution when it was not, The Big Bang THEORY, EVOLUTION, and CREATIVE DESIGN are a few examples to give.

      (The reason I gave evolution and the big bang theory is because it is faith pure and simple.. the Math does not add up to prove The Bang and for evolution.. why have we not had one example in the last 150 years that we can say has evolved and not just mutated?)

      This scarf thing is stupid, and maybe she is using it as a religious symbol...but is it any more stupid than people who tell others to take off crosses from around their necks so they don't show their Christian religon? Why is hypocrisy allowed in everything except when it is in regards to the Christian and Catholic religon?

      • Posted By: WishStone @ 02/19/2009 4:14:41 PM

        "(The reason I gave evolution and the big bang theory is because it is faith pure and simple.. the Math does not add up to prove The Bang and for evolution.. why have we not had one example in the last 150 years that we can say has evolved and not just mutated?)"
        Mhm, not sure how you understand evolution. Evolution is NOT a creature thinking: Oh, I have no food on the ground, so I need a long neck and become a giraffe'. Evolution IS due to mutation. A benefical mutation will spare or enhance the life or a certain species to the point where that mutated indevidual can have offspring... unlike the other non-mutated creatures.
        An interesting modern example if of African elephants which have suddenly a strong run of a mutation where the tusk is relatively small. Unlike their long-tusked brethren, they could have offspring that were not slaughtered by humans.

  • Posted By: patton434 @ 06/02/2008 11:44:37 AM

    While I do think it is rediculous for a company such as Dunkin Donuts to pull an ad because it (unjustly) offends a small group people (I say unjustly because it really was just a fashion scarf afterall), the fact remains that the muslim community in both the US and abroad, has on too many occaisions called for ads, articles, art, etc... to be pulled when it (unjustly) offended them! I say unjustly because they are apparenly offended by anything that resembles christianity or Judaism. According to the NY Times, they are trying to get England to stop teaching about the Holocaust in their history classes because it "offends them". What kind of racist group of people would be offended by that??!! In the US, they have been fighting tooth and nail to not allow Nativity scenes or Chanuaka menorahs to be displayed in public because it offends them. While I don't think Dunkin Donuts should have caved in and removed the ad, I also think that the Muslim community needs to come clean and acknowledge and address their intense biggotry, racism, and hatred!! Until that is done - no one should complain!

    • Posted By: shaba @ 06/02/2008 12:28:43 PM

      You are an IDIOT! Do you not realize how ignorant you appear when you post totally fabricated lies as facts? No, Muslims did not call for England to stop preaching about the Holocaust. Go to www.snopes.com and you will see that that was a fabricated email going around as a fact. No, Muslims do not have anything against Christianity or Judiasm. They are considered religions of the Book and as an Abrahimic religion the same as Islam. It is not Muslims who are against Christian symbols inside Christian countries, it is a certain other religion who has taken over the US and controls how they think and act. Why do you think schools can no longer call "winter break" Christmas break"? Because it offends the Jews since Hannakah is celebrated around the same time as Christmas. As for this scarf that people are saying resembles a keffiyeh, first of all, not only Muslim Arabs wear a keffiyeh, also the Christian and Jewish Arabs of certain countries wear it as well. So it is not an "Islamic headdress".

      • Posted By: patton434 @ 06/02/2008 2:12:51 PM

        No Shaba, YOU ARE AN IDIOT AND A RACIST! We can see this by you breaking out your "the jews control everything" myths! FACT: You can get arrested for wearing a cross - as my father did - in Saudi Arabia as well as many other countries! There are certianly many, many muslim individuals who may have no hatred of other religions, but most muslim countries DO NOT allow freedom of religion. If you had half a brain, or weren't related to Bin-Laden, you'd admit that!

        • Posted By: WishStone @ 02/19/2009 3:31:04 PM

          So... because another Nation does something close-minded and possibly problematic, your nation (no matter which) has to stoop to that level, too? How about teaching by example, or has that gone out of fashion?

  • Posted By: beausmom @ 06/02/2008 12:16:38 PM

    obviously Lorddemonawk has been watching too much of the media Hype that goes out of the US. We are no better or worse than any other citizen of any other country, so get over yourself and improve your own country instead of saying things about another country. You are soing exactly what you are blaming the
    US of doing!

    • Posted By: LordDemonawk @ 06/02/2008 12:18:31 PM

      How much can you honestly say, that coms out of the U.S. media, isn't somewhat fabricated by the government?

      • Posted By: Lady Pirate @ 06/02/2008 12:23:47 PM

        Since you live here you seem to be enjoying your 1st amendments rights of freedom of speech. Let me see you say anything you have said in your own contry and see how long you last.

        • Posted By: LordDemonawk @ 06/02/2008 12:27:05 PM

          i don't live in the U.S. and i'm damn proud of that fact.

          • Posted By: patton434 @ 06/02/2008 2:19:24 PM

            Of course not, you're probably in a country that is protected by the US!

            • Posted By: WishStone @ 02/19/2009 3:29:00 PM

              Mhm, yes. 'Protected'. Like Iraq, where the US 'protect' by forcing their world view on everything....

  • Posted By: American_1 @ 06/02/2008 1:41:25 PM

    MY GOD people .. we are letting 14% rule the U.S.A. .. We have been told we can't prayer in schools because it offends .. We are told we can't smoke because it offends ..We are told that we have to learn a new lanuage .. because our lanuage isn't understood .. and it offends poeople that can't understand it .. we can't have our holidays .. because it offends .. we can't pledge to our flag .. because it offends .. all this crap over a scarf .. what did you say again HOME OF THE FREE LAND OF THE BRAVE?? Our men and women are fighting for our freedom and dying and we have to go through all this.. wake up people .. this is America .. with this i will end .. take back America as we knew it .. if you dont like it then GET OUT!! .. GOD BLESS OUR MEN AND WOMEN AND MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!

    • Posted By: ghostmasseur @ 06/04/2008 10:00:50 AM

      American_1:

      You made several common mistakes in your post.

      "We have been told we can't prayer in schools because it offends"
      Not at all. It is because it violates the Establshment Clause of the US Cosntitution. If you knew anything about the history of prayer inthe schools you would knwo that the FORCED prayer (and they were forced) were specifically Christian. Even in public schools with almost majority Jewish student populations.

      "We are told we can't smoke because it offends"
      Not at all. It because of medical PROOF that second hand smoke is a serious health risk.

      "We are told that we have to learn a new lanuage .. because our lanuage isn't understood .. and it offends people that can't understand it"

      Although I too have problems with this issue, it is NOT because it offends. It is an attempt to make sure that government services are available to new immigrants. Now I personally think that it has gone too far but, NO ONE is being forced to learn a new language.

      "we can't have our holidays"
      Sure you can . It is the when the government does it taht there is a Constitutional problem. And stores are doing what theya re doing because they are intelligent enough to understand that not everyone in the US observes the same relgious holidays. It is called being civilised.

      "we can't pledge to our flag .. because it offends"
      Not at all. Again it is an Establishment Clasue issue. The pledge as it originally was written and said (unitl the nut jobs during the McCarthy abomination occured) did NOT have the words "under god" in it. My parents grew up saying the pledge as it was meant to be said.

      "Our men and women are fighting for our freedom and dying and we have to go through all this.. wake up people .. this is America .. with this i will end .. take back America as we knew it "
      Slavery, children forced labor, women not having a vote, segregation, etc. Oh yes let's get back to taht garbage. My father fought in WWII so that people who voiced dissent would have the right to do so. Our founding fathers felt that dissent was often the ultimate form of patriotism and that those who try to quash it are traitors.

      But intelligent dissent is critical. Gellar, Coulter and Malkin are not capable of intelligent comment let alone dissent. they only know racism and bigotry. They would have been great in Saddam's propaganda team.

      ".. if you dont like it then GET OUT!! "
      Mindless comment.

      • Posted By: American_1 @ 06/28/2008 12:56:53 PM

        ghost i believe that there was praying in the schools a long time before all the crap about it being politicial incorrect .. and i know that the pledge was .. i am old enough to remember that this nation was Under God's Rules .. and that we were a respected Nation .. now look what is happening .. and tell me...ok

        • Posted By: WishStone @ 02/19/2009 2:43:54 PM

          *polite cough*
          Germany has been a close and trusted ally of the United states since WWII and a number of presidents (both Conservertive and Liberal) could freely walk the crowds and be cheered on.
          Under President Bush, but started to feed more and more of the christian religion (State and Religion should be seperated for all I understand and feel) ; how 'War on Terror' -for Oil- and a number of other 'We are the greatest' moves... well, he was the first US President in ages who has to be shut away from the German public. That, so I feel, should make you wonder. Wonder and reflect. You seem to be a smart cookie, you can do it.

    • Posted By: WishStone @ 02/19/2009 2:37:57 PM

      Blimy. The closed-mindedness of some few... lime a certain american_1...
      So: I am German. Chunks of colonists in the 'New Lands' were Germans, Dutch or French. What is YOUR language? English, because they seemed to have a bigger populous? How about Scandinavian like Eric the Red? Or maybe you know some Native American languages? After all, Land+Language, eh?
      What makes you so different with your God-This and God-That (a concept most of western Europe abandoned and many feel backwards and chained by it, enslaved even)... how is the bible-thumping different from an Arab stating that Allah is great or to praise him? (Never mind that Judaism; Christianity and Islam all speak about one and the same Deity...)

    • Posted By: WishStone @ 02/19/2009 2:37:09 PM

      Blimy. The closed-mindedness of some few... lime a certain american_1...
      So: I am German. Chunks of colonists in the 'New Lands' were Germans, Dutch or French. What is YOUR language? English, because they seemed to have a bigger populous? How about Scandinavian like Eric the Red? Or maybe you know some Native American languages? After all, Land+Language, eh?
      What makes you so different with your God-This and God-That (a concept most of western Europe abandoned and many feel backwards and chained by it, enslaved even)... how is the bible-thumping different from an Arab stating that Allah is great or to praise him? (Never mind that Judaism; Christianity and Islam all speak about one and the same Deity...)

  • Posted By: Vigilance @ 02/03/2009 3:24:25 PM

    hahahah @ "more deadly than a paisley scarf in spring"

    Michelle Malkin - if you read this - you are a coward of the worst stripe.

  • Posted By: Vigilance @ 02/03/2009 2:16:20 PM

    Dunkin' Donuts' decision to cave on this was one of the most cowardly things I've ever seen. I wanted to draw a political cartoon with an exec asking another, "Pardon me, have you seen my spine anywhere?"

    Even if the article of clothing in question had ACTUALLY BEEN A KAFFIYEH - which it wasn't - kaffiyehs are worn by peace-loving Middle Easterners and others around the world, routinely, every day. There is nothing wrong with them, period. All Dunkin' Donuts has done is to cater to the racist prejudices of the worst of their customer base - including, apparently, Michelle Malkin, whose stance on the whole issue continues to appall me beyond mind or measure.

  • Posted By: EricInColorado @ 02/03/2009 12:31:54 PM

    So, the majority of conservative boggers have a large interest in Krispy Kreme? I mean, this is a political ideology that praises the free market. If they want to start boycotting companys that give Muslim extremist groups power they could put money into alternative energy, couldn't they? Or did Rush Limbaugh tell them wind turbines are another Jihadist plot?

  • Posted By: EricInColorado @ 02/03/2009 12:26:32 PM

    I'm sure all the conservative bloggers who decried this incident to begin with are the same who advocate lassez faire government interaction with affairs of the economy. ITS JUST A DOUGHNUT AD, IT WAS MADE TO SELL DOUGHNUTS. If this is your idea of pro jihadist propaganda, then you really should boycott something major... oh say, an oil company? OH, wait, can't get in the way of the free market, what was I thinking?

    These Limbaugh wanna bes probably just have stock in Krispy Kreme.

  • Posted By: KaiBolger@mac.com @ 07/01/2008 1:27:59 AM

    FYI: The phrase "under God" was added to the Pledge of Allegiance in June 1954 after a vigorous campaign by the Knights of Columbus, the world's largest Catholic fraternal organization.

    • Posted By: byronkhan @ 02/02/2009 11:32:52 PM

      Small but significant correction, Kai- America was indeed founded upon the idea of natural rights (the Constitution says "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness", though it was inspired by John Locke's notion of property, or "Life, Liberty, and Estate"), but the Rights of Man, when written with big, important Capital Letters, is a different concept entirely- the Rights of Man are the French "Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite". Unlike our Constitutional rights, which are based on centuries of English common law and millennia of practical experience, the French sought to abolish the lessons of history and adopt the lofty goal of emancipating Man not only from tyranny and anarchy, but from scarcity and civilization- the former being an undeniable fact of life that even a very clever and passionate French socialist cannot argue away, the latter being the source of our accrued art, science, culture, language, etc. Forgive me for being nitpicky- I agree with your sentiment entirely, America is founded upon self-evident rights, including even the right to name or refute the Creator who supposedly endowed us with them. But the difference between human rights and the Rights of Man is the difference between the American Revolution and the French Reign of Terror (and following Napoleonic Empire). I feel the distinction is an important one, while we're on the subject of what constitutes "American".

  • Posted By: Freyyr @ 02/02/2009 10:44:36 PM

    I wonder how many Americans realize that the word coffee is an English mutation of the Arabic word "qahweh." Coffee was cultivated by the Muslims as one of their replacements for alcohol (forbidden under traditional Islam). Its popularity as a beverage started in Ethiopia and quickly spread to the rest of the Islamic world.

    Most Americans will also associate coffee houses and coffee shops as a late 20th-century, early 21st century American and European concept. The Arabs actually started it - coffee houses were popular in Persia early 1100s. The "American" coffee house is actually an Arabic tradition almost a thousand years old.

  • Posted By: KaiBolger@mac.com @ 07/01/2008 1:17:14 AM

    American_1: Please, PLEASE learn the English language. You seems so offended at the idea of learning another language - like Spanish, which is the mother language of native-born American citizens in Puerto Rico - but you are incapable of expressing a lucid, cogent thought in your native language. And for the record - the original Pledge of Allegiance did NOT include the phrase "under God" until that was added by self-serving hypocrites within our lifetime. This country was NOT "built on God" - it was built on the concept of the Rights of Man. Do yourself a favor and read a little. Your ignorance is appalling.

  • Posted By: American_1 @ 06/28/2008 12:46:24 PM

    the statement i made early on in this discuss was taken so wrong .. i believe that all people should be able to live in the United States .. as long as they are govern with our rules and our way of living .. i believe that Americans should come first for this is our country .. i believe that in order to help others .. you must first help those in your country that needs it .. i understand that people have their own faith that they worship by .. but understand this country was build on GOD .. if we dont take God back into our lives we will lose the Grace of Him .. as for the scarf that Rachael wore that should be her own decision .. whether be for her Faith or style .. not all Muslims are terrorists .. they just want to be respected as much as everyone else living .. We have to stand together as a Nation .. and earn back the respect of the World .. There no country in the World that is as good as the United States .. but we need to stand by and for what this country was built on .. God!!! .. please dont take this comment wrong .. but we Are The Home of the Free and Brave .. and we have men and women to prove this .. I Pray everynight that we will bring our Soldiers home .. we have lost enough .. I want America back the way it was when we had a say so in our Government .. and that was all i was stating .. God Bless America and all of its people .. and I Pledge the alligence to the Flag for which it stands 1 Nation Under God .. with Liberity and justice for all .. American_1

  • Posted By: adastra8 @ 06/13/2008 12:08:27 AM

    I recently received my copy of "Who Speaks for Islam", which reports the results of a Gallup poll of Muslims around the world. The explanation for the kaffiyeh absurdity lies in the fact that the vast majority of Americans - including myself - are shockingly ignorant of the 1/6th of our planet that is Muslim. The more all of us exert to close the gap, the less possible it will be for hate-mongers to get away with this sort of thing.

  • Posted By: joe_mama @ 06/12/2008 11:52:50 AM

    you guys are all sympathizers...

    Clearly Ms. Ray is trying to fatten us up for the impending Muslim invasion!

    Times like this make less than proud to be an American....

  • Posted By: lochcarren @ 06/09/2008 7:05:13 PM

    We have neighbors who have a Persian cat. Do you think they might be terrorists?

  • Posted By: descendfromgrace @ 06/09/2008 2:09:54 AM

    The insanity of it is that It doesn't even remotely resemble a kaffiyeh, just an ugly scarf. I suppose we better start beating down people for owning articles of clothing however remotely tied to the Middle East. Hey guys! I hear that these ladies down at St. Mary's wear black headscarves and black gowns all day long.. the good sisters are clearly terrorists!

  • Posted By: SharedThought @ 06/06/2008 1:21:26 PM

    This is another example of the ways in which an educated, modern industrial society sometimes behaves in less-than-rational ways. A century from now, people will look back on things like this Dunkin' Donuts "controversy," and they will ask themselves, "Was that the SAME country that, in its earlier history, gave us the light bulb and the telephone?"

  • Posted By: jgb2004 @ 06/04/2008 10:44:00 PM

    Reading this article made my day. Thank you.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse