The Same People

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: dragontoe @ 06/12/2008 2:12:48 AM

    Why do you people hate gays so much? Will God judge you for hating or me for loving?
    Seriously. All i want to do is marry the person I love. And no, it's not because i'm SEXUALLY attracted. It's because I have an emotional attraction, as many of you heterosexual couples do.

    I saw a comment about gays turning their backs on religion, and I would like to say that is 100% UNTRUE. It is religion that has turned their backs on us. You know... I think God and Jesus are cooler than to judge me for being different so harshly. Just because I love another man? I do believe in God, but I believe he is a loving God. Not such a hating being that all of you portray.

    How would all of you feel if your rights as a couple were taken away? How about you look at it from that point of view, and REALIZE that gay marriage will not affect you in the slightest bit, so STOP CARING ABOUT IT!

  • Posted By: BAJUAMDA @ 06/11/2008 2:28:27 PM

    I noted with great interest that within the space of two paragraphs Anna Quindlen mentioned two very stirring points in her piece on gay marriage, and yet failed to bring them full circle. She says ??????opponents were suggesting that civilization would crash and burn if two gays could register at the pottery barn and raise kids in a ranch house.??? In the next paragraph she quotes a ???Roman poem from the second century A.D.??? describing a marriage ceremony between a ???bearded Callistratus??? and a ???rugged Afer???

    The second century A.D. is in fact marked as the turning point from the rising to the falling of the Roman Empire. The point at which it began, shall we say, "to crash and burn" (literally burn). Most historians note as a huge ingredient in that fall, the moral depravity that had become a cancer at the core of the Roman civilization ate them away from the inside, weakening them to be overcome from the outside.

    If we are indeed the same people, I pray that we are not the same civilization.

  • Posted By: merinurban @ 06/10/2008 11:10:12 PM

    And Ms. Quinlen, if time is supposed to make this acceptable and you quoted an ancient marriage ceremony between two men, why is it not accepted centuries later? It may be an accepted exception but it will never be "ordinary." Interracial marriage is still unusual and the uproar over the candidacies of Obama and Clinton show that it takes decades for attitudes to catch up with legislation. The right to vote was granted long ago and slavery ended over a hundred years ago. And only now do we see candidates that reflect the fruition of those laws.

  • Posted By: merinurban @ 06/10/2008 10:45:38 PM

    We can be as politically correct as we wish, but twenty years from no we will see what this great social experiment nets. I fear dire consequences.

  • Posted By: docma90 @ 06/10/2008 5:18:19 PM

    I agree gays should have the same marital rights as heteros. But they should obtain them the way heteros did, by statute from the people, not by judicial fiat and flawed logic. Equal protection should be for groups of different people, not for protection of people's behavior. By this logic, any activity I should decide to engage in, say prostitution, or bigamy should be equally protected. And I've been paying attention, and this is the argument I hear, not homophobia (urban myth, anyone?)

  • Posted By: Ric86 @ 06/09/2008 12:42:04 PM

    "The kids are all right" is very wrong. Adults who live a homosexual lifestyle are statistically and significantly far more likely to have been sexually abused as a child and to do the same to children. And children growing up deprived and precluded of both a mother and father because they are in a same-sex household are statistically and significantly far more likely to choose same-sex behavior growing up and as an adult.

    It is time to stop lying to children. Children deserve a mother and father. Once cannot "change gender"; dna and chromosomes do not change. It is time to stop cowering in fear of their bullying labels and stop lying to children.

    Read another testimonial. The advocates for same-sex behavior hate these people because they lived to tell the truth. For them and for us, they reserve bullying names. We are not the cowards they expect, which many of you have instead become, in acquiescing to their expectations and discarding the values for children and society. Intimidation and demeaning is not an argument; yet it remains their essential tool. It is to be rejected as their wrong priorities for our culture and children is to be rejected.
    --------------

    Today, lust no longer has a tremendous hold on me. There are occasional difficult moments, but they are the exception, not the rule.

    The most rewarding part of my homosexual recovery has been that I am finally making close male friends. This is a new experience for me. Wouldn't you say it's about time at age 65?

    I had always believed my homosexuality was primarily a problem in dealing with women. However, I now see that that is not where the difficulty lies. My relationship with men has been the issue all along. I could never have a genuine friendship with a man, because I would always fall in love with him! At last I understand why. Now, I'm no longer afraid to talk to men. I can even hug them with no sexual thoughts trying to take over. This is progress!

    The gay lobby is very influential, and they have pretty much convinced the average American that our struggles are genetically induced. According to them, there is no hope of change. They are wrong.
    I've discovered that you're never too ingrained in a habit, or too old to change and begin anew.
    (Don W. Prichard)


    • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/09/2008 5:52:06 PM

      Oh--one more thing. All the kids I know from gay families are straight, just as the overwhelming majority of gay people whose life stories I know had straight parents. That's also consistent with the research--there's no relationship.

      My son has a huge crush on Ariel the mermaid (she kissed him at Disney World during spring break). I think that's a wonderful thing.

      There's something in the genes, or the hormones, or in early development, or all of this combined. It's a normal variation. Most folks are right-handed; some are left-handed. You can still have a good, productive life, however God made you!

      Peace, noahsdad

    • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/09/2008 5:42:13 PM

      No, no, no. All the research--with a consistency rare in social science research--shows that the kids turn out fine, with no significant differences in adjustment between them and their straight peers. There is one difference--they tend to be more tolerant. And some research suggests that lesbians might be the best parents of all...

      I can absolutely vouch for these findings based on anecdotal evidence I observed during my tenure as Sunday School director in a gay church. A male couple I know adopted one of the partners' 2 nephews and a niece, whose addict birth parents were living in a car. They're doing great now.

      It is a slander that gay men are more likely to abuse. Most abuse takes place in straight families. That does not mean we should demonize all of them.

      In my partner's teaching practice, he has observed abused kids, kids with both parents in jail, kids who witnessed their dad's murder of their mom. All of them have straight parents. You're claiming that, simply by virtue of their genitalia, they're better parents than we could ever hope to be. That, sir, IS a lie.

      Please focus on the facts, not on slander and hallucination. You'll be better off.

      Peace, noahsdad

  • Posted By: paad @ 06/09/2008 1:04:17 PM

    I find the quote from Roman 2nd century poetry interesting especially in light of the the fact that eventually, the Roman empire, um, fell. Ms. Quinlen, you do youth a discredit by letting them settle comfortably with " a classmate" who "had come out of the closet." Adolescence if a very trying time, emotionally and physically. Love and fidelity are compatible with friendship apart from lust and sex, in same-sex relationships and opposite-sex relationships. Your reasoning is faulty, flimsy and foolish based on changing mores instead of foundational truth. It wasn't until I read the book of Romans in the Bible, chapter 12 verse 2 that I realized the lie I was believing about my "sexual orientation." I would encourage you to read and thoroughly study the entire Bible beforing offering your opinions on His creatures. With all due respect, PAF

    • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/09/2008 5:32:35 PM

      God has a great sense of humor, you know. My in-laws came to my church on their 45th wedding anniversary. During the sharing of joys and concerns, one male couple announced they were celebrating 45 years together.

      Peace, noahsdad

  • Posted By: Ric86 @ 06/09/2008 12:46:03 PM

    When I was 16, I became sexually active with another teen-age boy. Our sexual relationship continued for the next two years. He introduced me to pornography and to the gay "cruising" scene. By this, I mean that I became actively involved in meeting other men anonymously in parks and public bathrooms for sex. When I started college at age 18, I believed that my homosexual activity would stop. However the stresses of life became greater, and my acting-out increased to an addictive level. At this point, I realized that my homosexual attractions and behavior were not just a "passing phase." I realized that I was truly a homosexual.
    I am now 26 and have been free from homosexual acting-out for three years. I am no longer sexually drawn to other men, and my previously non-existent heterosexual attractions have emerged. My urge to seek sexual change was based on my internal emotional pain, not societal pressures to "become straight."
    I tried living a gay lifestyle, and in my experience, it is unfulfilling and empty. The healing is not about suppressing the homosexual attractions. It is about embracing them for what they are, and for what they truly symbolize.
    I believe that homosexuality is a symptom (such as alcoholism or drug abuse) of deeper wounding. The very fact that 90% of gay couples are not monogamous, and that most gay men report early childhood sexual abuse, clearly states to me that homosexuality is inherently a developmental issue. There are too many environmental common denominators among homosexuals to conclude that the causes are random or biological.
    (anonymous)

    • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/09/2008 5:30:55 PM

      That's your story, and I'm glad you've found peace at last. That isn't true of everyone, though. I came from an intact, loving, 2-parent family. I tried heterosexuality, but for me, it was going through the motions, not who I really was. In my mid-20s, I discovered my true self, and am deeply and profoundly glad I did. I have been with my partner now for 18 years.

      Peace, noahsdad

  • Posted By: Ric86 @ 06/09/2008 3:38:10 PM

    Stop lying to children to justify your own self-centered demands that society approve as "equal" your behavior. It by definition and without exception can NEVER create life and that is fact.

    To the blamers of the Bible as "self-righteous" (not self-rightious ??? learn to spell), go read Matthew 19:4-6 and by YOUR definition then that Jesus, he sure was clearly and of course a self-righteous homophobe bigot !!

    • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/09/2008 5:20:23 PM

      I do accept Jesus, but I think marriage should also be available to the gay and lesbian Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, and atheists, etc., among us.

  • Posted By: sjbrock80 @ 06/09/2008 4:26:31 PM

    Go ahead and shine in all your gayness and self-proclaimed glory. Don't be upset if I puke on you, though.

  • Posted By: twohandsatyr @ 06/09/2008 1:28:05 PM

    To all the Bible thumpers, I want to direct your attention to a single statement by Ms. Quindlen: "...is there so much love and commitment in the world that we can afford, as a society, to be contemptuous of some portion of it?" Now, ask yourself: Why have so many gay people have turned their backs on religion as something they view as devisive and irrational? You may now check your self-rightiousness at the door, please.

  • Posted By: jaymatsen @ 06/09/2008 12:33:23 PM

    I believe a great society grows from accepting the various lifestyles from within the community. Who has the right to tell another "you can't marry the one you love because I think its wrong, or the bible says so." This is a new day and age, think of the suppression (and slavery) of the african american people a mere 90 years ago, and look at them now. Someday gay marriage shall be a norm. I hope it's someday soon.

  • Posted By: Ric86 @ 06/09/2008 12:03:17 PM

    Ms. Quindlen, do believe children deserve a mother and father? Redefining marriage to include same-sex partners precludes this by definition.

    The will of the far greater majority of people are being rebuked by a handful of judges. Why is it not tyranny to redefine marriage for the first time in western civilized history, against our will? Why is redefining marriage against the will of the great majority a better value than what children deserve?

    Why are all the moral leaders and all the religions of the last two thousand years all wrong and you and the minority right? Why do children not deserve a mother and father and why ever preclude that? Why?

    Do you ever read testimonials of people who lived a homosexual lifestyle and later rejected it? Do you even care?

    Do you know who Michael Glatze is? Here is his testimony.

    ------------------------

    When I look back on my life in the gay community, there was always a sense that ???You don???t question your same-sex desires.??? In fact -- it???s rule number one. As soon as you join the club, that???s the first rule. You can go ahead and examine any other thing???s cause, except for homosexuality. It is like a cult.

    Of course, as puberty takes place, the body is full of sexual energy, and already, I???m craving the masculinity, because I obviously need to have it in myself. But at the same time, I don???t want it, because I???m afraid of it. All that makes perfect sense-- and yet the real clincher there, when I look back on it, is this fabricated gay identity [offered by society]. I can remember very clearly when I was 14, a friend of mine coming to me and explaining to me that I was gay. And that???s the problem, right there. If we continue to feed this identity to people, they???ll never solve their problems. It???s like a sugar coating. And it???s really insidious, when you realize that in my work as editor of a gay magazine for young people, I was doing this to teenagers! That???s what made me eventually stop. I had been slowly gaining an understanding about my gay identity, yet I just didn???t want to say anything about that yet, at my job. But then, I would read stories about gay-affirming books going into grade schools, and that???s when I realized that this had to stop.

    (Michael Glatze, A former gay activist, decided at the age of 13 that he
    was gay and eventually founded Young Gay America, a nonprofit
    media outreach project. Through a series of incidents,
    however, Glatze slowly began to realize that he was not gay at
    all but was dealing with fears about his own masculinity. He
    has since rejected his gay identity.)

    --------------------

    There are countless examples of people who have rejected this lifestyle. Do you ever read them and does that matter? Do children matter? Do you care about what you are doing to us and our children? Do you?

    • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/09/2008 12:18:31 PM

      Kids like mine get a "forever family," which you would preclude (see my postings, below). Please explain why you think my son would be better off in an institution.

      And the only ones who seek to change their orientation are by definition those who are troubled by it--not the happy, healthy majority, whom you do not seem well acquainted with. Of those who do undertake that kind of change, many end up discovering their true, gay selves. There are happy couples who met in "reparative therapy." So by all means, live the life that makes you happy--but don't assume it works for everyone.

      Also, please check the research on kids raised in gay families. The kids are all right.

  • Posted By: John Bryans Fontaine @ 06/08/2008 12:22:29 AM

    Contending that the gay marriage issue is over is an Orwellian Lie. The issue of gay marriage could easily cost Democrats the 2008 presidential election. Democrats must weigh whether this issue is indeed more important than other progressive causes, such as re-empowering labor, creating a national health care program or keeping choice legal.

    It is just a fact of political life that working-class folks hold a traditional view of marriage. And remember, before 1993, gay marriage wasn't even an issue.

    If the norma-phobic, Holywood-centered elite of gay marriage advocates were less selfish, self-centered and more honest, they would start up their own political party.

    Again, the issue of gay marriage could cause Democrats to lose in 2008. This is why both Obama and Clinton continue to oppose gay marriage, though both support civil unions.

    I would ask all gay marriage advocates, why do you want to give George W. Bush a third term?

    • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/08/2008 9:36:02 AM

      Well, sir, I think $4 a gallon gas will take precedence for many people. There are a host of other issues that are way more pressing on people's minds right now. They tried throwing the "gay agenda" at the special elections in MS & LA--didn't work. It may draw some to the polls in CA, because of the ballot issue, but the outcome there isn't clear. Nationwide, all the states that could get DOMAs now have them--there's no more room there. I think the momentum has slowed for this sort of thing.

  • Posted By: Concerned Canadian @ 05/31/2008 10:23:51 PM

    Gays should shut up. Society doesn't need to know what a person does for sex. Second , marriage is an entitlement in the Christian church for a man and for a women. This is the foundation of family. Gays cannot form a family. They cannot expect to rear children under this arrangement and expect these children to grow up psychologically normal. This is destructive to society. This is the truth. I don't want to know who's gay, I don't want to know how they have sex, I don't want these people with children. Its a symptom of serious problems a person has with their self esteem. All this gay stuff is not natural. Its way of life is exaggerated
    and to say one is born " gay " is basically a false assessment.

    • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/08/2008 12:35:18 AM

      Well, I feel for you. Canada has gay marriage nationwide. O Canada!

    • Posted By: An=merican60a @ 06/03/2008 9:43:59 AM

      Concerned Canadian, you DO want to interfere in other's live's. You want everyone to adhere to what you believe is Christian truth. Sorry, I'm not buying what you're selling. I am not a Christian.
      i'm a pretty conservative chap myself - I don't publicly discuss my sex life. But I am gay. Again, I am not a Christian. Get it? I am not a Christian. Never was, NEVER will be. I do not share your faith, Canadian. I don't begrudge you your faith. Stay out of my faith, and my life.
      Do you believe in democracy, or just in Christianity?

    • Posted By: Rocketeer @ 06/01/2008 12:17:30 PM

      How many ways can you be wrong? Let's count them.

      1) "God" made homosexuality a common attribute throughout the animal kingdom. There's not a single advanced species that doesn't exhibit the behavior, including many cases with higher frequency than in humans. And don't give me that people are different BS, they're not. Created by God, humans share all the physical characteristics and frailties of other animals. If animals are the creation of God, then they are, by definition,, perfect. Why wouldn't He use the same model for us? Sheesh! Can't you people get your heads around the concept of the 'soul' being the unique gift of heaven?

      2) Several mainstream Christian denominations accept gay marriage and even elevate gays to positions of authority in the church. Maybe YOURS doesn't, but you'll have to provide me and everyone else living a different life in Christ is wrong. And don't eve bother with quoting Romans and Leviticus unless you can prove you're also throwing rocks at people eating shellfish and pork, wearing mixed blend fabric or who have committed adultery. Face it. The New Testament trumps the Old. Maybe God needed to send Christ in part because we were getting His message so wrong. The God of the New Testament certainly found worth and divinity in EVERYONE, and Jesus was quite pointed in His condemnation of anyone who tried to reject or elevate themselves above anyone else.

      3) And finally, even if your other ideas are accepted at face value, you blow it by declaring marriage as being first and foremost about procreation. If you really believed this, then you would have to also oppose marriage for the infertile and to favor making it a crime abstain from reproduction in marriage. Are you going there as well????

    • Posted By: Rocketeer @ 06/01/2008 12:01:19 PM

      How many ways can you be wrong? Let's count them.

      1) "God" made homosexuality a common attribute throughout the animal kingdom. There's not a single advanced species that doesn't exhibit the behavior, including many cases with higher frequency than in humans. And don't give me that people are different BS, they're not. Created by God, humans share all the physical characteristics and frailties of other animals. If animals are the creation of God, then they are, by definition,, perfect. Why wouldn't He use the same model for us? Sheesh! Can't you people get your heads around the concept of the 'soul' being the unique gift of heaven?

      2) Several mainstream Christian denominations accept gay marriage and even elevate gays to positions of authority in the church. Maybe YOURS doesn't, but you'll have to provide me and everyone else living a different life in Christ is wrong. And don't eve bother with quoting Romans and Leviticus unless you can prove you're also throwing rocks at people eating shellfish and pork, wearing mixed blend fabric or who have committed adultery. Face it. The New Testament trumps the Old. Maybe God needed to send Christ in part because we were getting His message so wrong. The God of the New Testament certainly found worth and divinity in EVERYONE, and Jesus was quite pointed in His condemnation of anyone who tried to reject or elevate themselves above anyone else.

      3) And finally, even if your other ideas are accepted at face value, you blow it by declaring marriage as being first and foremost about procreation. If you really believed this, then you would have to also oppose marriage for the infertile and to favor making it a crime abstain from reproduction in marriage. Are you going there as well????

    • Posted By: Rocketeer @ 06/01/2008 11:58:46 AM

      How many ways can you be wrong? Let's count them.

      1) "God" made homosexuality a common attribute throughout the animal kingdom. There's not a single advanced species that doesn't exhibit the behavior, including many cases with higher frequency than in humans. And don't give me that people are different BS, they're not. Created by God, humans share all the physical characteristics and frailties of other animals. If animals are the creation of God, then they are, by definition,, perfect. Why wouldn't He use the same model for us? Sheesh! Can't you people get your heads around the concept of the 'soul' being the unique gift of heaven?

      2) Several mainstream Christian denominations accept gay marriage and even elevate gays to positions of authority in the church. Maybe YOURS doesn't, but you'll have to provide me and everyone else living a different life in Christ is wrong. And don't eve bother with quoting Romans and Leviticus unless you can prove you're also throwing rocks at people eating shellfish and pork, wearing mixed blend fabric or who have committed adultery. Face it. The New Testament trumps the Old. Maybe God needed to send Christ in part because we were getting His message so wrong. The God of the New Testament certainly found worth and divinity in EVERYONE, and Jesus was quite pointed in His condemnation of anyone who tried to reject or elevate themselves above anyone else.

      3) And finally, even if your other ideas are accepted at face value, you blow it by declaring marriage as being first and foremost about procreation. If you really believed this, then you would have to also oppose marriage for the infertile and to favor making it a crime abstain from reproduction in marriage. Are you going there as well????

  • Posted By: jenxyz78 @ 06/01/2008 12:40:03 AM

    To those who dogmatically assert that the gay people should just stop being gay because it is not God's natural plan: have YOU ever looked into the eyes of a spouse who confesses he CAN NOT desire you because he is not normal & can not change ? Have you ever looked into the eyes of your BORN AGAIN CHRISTIAN husband who has just admitted plotting to take his life in the garage ? H-LL no you have not .
    FYI , I am an evangelical christian who knows plenty of other believers who are tortured because they do not want to have homosexual desires . They want to be like everyone else and feel like they can be part of the church .

    I know a man who was a counselor at a prominent ultraconservative seminary and he frequently had young seminary students in his office struggling because they COULD NOT DESIRE WOMEN .

    I can not find one place in scripture where Jesus condemned homosexuals .

    The ignorant suggestion that gay people should just start desiring people of the opposite sex calls this into question . Do you believe YOU choose what you are attracted to ?! NONE OF US DO. While we DO choose who we interact with sexually , none of us has the ability to force ourselves to be attracted to anything !

    As a christian, I find the other believers here to be a poor reflection of the message of Christ
    in their condemning tone .

    Most of you who advise gays to stop having homosexual desires have never batlled a day with the issue, though you seem to view yourself as experts on how to overcome the problem. Give me a break!

    • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 06/01/2008 10:24:52 AM

      I find your comments hopeful and encouraging Jen. It's good to know there are Christians out there with some common sense.

      • Posted By: Mountain lover @ 06/01/2008 12:04:50 PM

        Jen, you are right. I is impossible to control how your attractions develop. But if they develop toward something that is sinful, you have to deal with it. If you wake up lusting for barnyard animals you can't just "go with it". If you are convinced you have to cheat on your spouse, because you have lost all desire for your spousse and now have desire for another you can;t just "go with it". Should pedophiles give up the fight also and go with the flow?

        Homosexuals have been dealt a tough hand, i.e. unwanted sexual desires. The fact is that we all have unwanted sexual desires at some point. They just have it worse. To give in to the desires is not a prerequisite to a happy life. I personally know dozens of people with homosexual desires who live a sexually fulfiilling life with their spouses. It doesn't mean the undesirable attractions have been lost completely. But they choose to live their life out as God intended.

        We all have our secret lusts to fight as married couples. Homosexual face a tough fight. but it is not God's intention to give into wrong sexual desires. Gays can choose to change. Just as a porn addict can choose not to look. The porn addict may live his whole life without porn an go to his grave desiring it. But he chooses not to. Gays must do the same for the Glory of God.

        CV




        Gay people have been dealt a tough hand.

        • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/08/2008 12:32:58 AM

          My deepest joy is from living as I feel God intended--with a partner and a child.

    • Posted By: TGCA @ 06/01/2008 4:33:48 PM

      I generally agree with your comments. My personal belief is that God does not hate gays. Sinning by being gay is no more sinful than other sins in my opinion (i.e. cheating, lying, greed, gluttony, vanity, etc,). I give thanks to God every day for the blessings in my life, no matter how small. They are my first thoughts in the morning and my last thoughts in the evening when I lay down to sleep. I can live with myself as a gay man because I believe God wants me to be a better person and strive towards that, and not a perfect person, something I or anyone will never achieve. That being said, there still are things we can do in our lives that are best for society even if it does not suit our own needs. Gay marriage is my example of that. I do not believe it is best for society based on social impact. It has nothing to do with my religious beliefs; therefore, I cannot support it though it would personally benefit me.

      • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/08/2008 12:31:56 AM

        As a gay man, I believe it would benefit society.

    • Posted By: TXoldgeezer @ 06/01/2008 8:58:45 AM

      Since you are a Christian you might want to consult the Bible. Try the first chapter of Romans for a start to find out what God thinks about homosexuality.

      • Posted By: mlv1055 @ 06/03/2008 4:17:44 PM

        Same to ya. The opinions expressed in Romans are Paul's. Jesus never mentioned homosexuality. Paul tried to pursuade Roman Christians to give up many normal, accepted Roman ways of life so they would stand apart from other Roman citizens. The lesson from Romans is that homosexuality was a normal, accepted part of daily life in Rome. People who use the Bible merely to point out everyone else's sin have missed the boat, and the real important message that Christ tried to teach. You should stand in front of the mirror and read the book of Matthew to yourself.

  • Posted By: slicrespo @ 06/01/2008 11:25:59 AM

    You guys have missed this author's point: the young people don't care! The over 35 crowd still wants to try to debate this, but the young people are over it. As they move into the political scene, this issue is going to disappear. Our courts are beginning to protect the discriminated class from the tyranny of the majority, but the democratic process is also following suit as reflected in the opinions of our young people.

    In response to Quayle below, my same sex partner and I have three children. And they have two parents who love them and raise them not in a lesbian bubble, but in a global community where they have many role models of many genders, ethnicities, religions, ages and abilities. I dare say they fair better than 50% of their friends raised in single-parent households where the parents are spread so thin that their kids don't have the benefit of financial resources or adult time beyond paid babysitters, and that's if they aren't left alone. 50% of heterosexual marriages end in divorce. What we need is more marriages that work, not fewer. There is nothing in your pants that makes you an inherantly better parent along with your wife than what I have with my wife.

    C

    • Posted By: TGCA @ 06/01/2008 3:38:41 PM

      As a gay male, I think it is great that you are raising children in a loving environment but I believe you are missing the point of some posters. Just because the majority of young people don???t care about something does not make it right. The majority of young people would also rather party than go to school, eat junk food than eat healthy, and have sex with someone they think is attractive rather than consider the long-term implication of establishing a stable relationship too, but that does not suggest that their choices are right or healthy for their environment.

      In addition, regarding divorce rates in the US. The 50% number is based on 1st time divorces and varies in cultures, economic classes, and demographics, and is usually attributable to people not ready for marriage (i.e. young and immature). 2nd time marriages last significantly longer. Those with traditional upbringings also tend to be on the lower side of such divorce rates too. And with respect to this number as a whole, 50% is still much less than the long-term commitment survival experience in the gay community. Gay relationships have the shortest of any relationships span and that is why probably 90% or more of gay males can???t sustain a MONOGAMOUS relationship that exceeds 2 to 5 years or more.

      So it is great that you have found success and provide a loving environment for your family, and I hope it lasts forever, but this is not the norm in the gay community so please do not try to pass it off as such by criticizing failures in the straight community because the analogy is not relevant.

      • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/08/2008 12:28:16 AM

        I've been with my partner for 18 years and our son is 9. I know a number of other gay families with kids.

    • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/08/2008 12:21:58 AM

      Good for you!

  • Posted By: real democrat @ 06/01/2008 12:15:34 PM

    What a dishonest column!

    I believe that the debate on gay marriage might have progressed as you describe with compassion and basic practical American politics prevailing over tradition. However, as in the case of abortion an arrogant court trumped democracy.

    I fear the result will be the same: hardened feelings and harsher positions by opponents, and elongated battles because of judges who don't believe in the rule of law.

    • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/08/2008 12:21:17 AM

      But it is progressing in a patchwork that resembles past legal frameworks that ultimately led to civil rights advances. The process is working.

  • Posted By: Denizen @ 06/01/2008 11:46:11 AM

    I have no problems with gay civil unions with the same rights to partners as those that spouses have in marriage. But I don???t want a gay union called marriage. You don???t redefine a centuries-old word to suit your selfish aims. The reason the word is crucial, though, is because they want to force those with a different viewpoint not just to accept, but to endorse their lifestyle.

    • Posted By: noahsdad @ 06/08/2008 12:20:12 AM

      It's not selfish. The trouble is that "union" does not convey the same status as "marriage"--see NJ.

  • Posted By: John Bryans Fontaine @ 06/08/2008 12:19:12 AM

    Like so many gay marriage fanatics, Anna Quindlen lives in a separate reality. The issue of gay marriage could easily cost Democrats the 2008 presidential election. Democrats must weigh whether this issue is indeed more important than other progressive causes, such as re-empowering labor, creating a national health care program or keeping choice legal.

    It is just a fact of political life that working-class folks hold a traditional view of marriage. And remember, before 1993, gay marriage wasn't even an issue.

    If the norma-phobic, Holywood-centered elite of gay marriage advocates were less politically selfish, self-centered and more honest, they would start up their own political party.

    Again, the issue of gay marriage could cause Democrats to lose in 2008. This is why both Obama and Clinton continue to oppose gay marriage, though both support civil unions.

    I would ask all gay marriage advocates, why do you want to give George W. Bush a third term?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse