INTERNATIONAL

Inside Guantánamo Bay

Photographer Ziv Koren got a rare chance to photograph and video the U.S. detention facility in Cuba. What he found.

Inside Guantanamo

6/4/08: NEWSWEEK photographer Ziv Koren visits the controversial maximum-security prison. (Video: Ziv Koren, Solo Avital)

 
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Israeli photographer Ziv Koren recently traveled to Guantánamo Bay on assignment for NEWSWEEK to capture some footage inside the detention camps. After months of waiting for clearance, he was able to spend several days in May on the inside shooting both video and still photographs. Koren has developed a special technique for capturing video and still images simultaneously. The resulting video has a stop-motion feel that gives viewers a sense of how photographers choose to frame still images.

U.S. officials are highly concerned about the public image of the detention camps, particularly after the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2006 entitling all detainees to rights and protections in accordance with Geneva Conventions. Few photojournalists have been permitted to capture images at Guantánamo, and NEWSWEEK's Jessica Bloustein spoke with Koren about his rare experience. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: What did it take to get clearance to go in and shoot?
Ziv Koren:
It took five months to get approval to go in. They required a list of my clients, my CV [curriculum vitae], a list of the assignments I'd completed, a list of my gear. Pretty much everything I have.

What happened when you first arrived?
We followed a tight schedule and were told what to film when. I was with another [Associated Press] photographer and two other camera people from different news [outlets]. In two and a half days of shooting, we'd spend half a day shooting and half a day for censorship. They gave us a tour of the border between Guantanamo and Cuba, and interviews with generals. We toured [Camp] X-Ray [a temporary holding facility], which is now totally unoccupied. The grass is three feet high, but they still keep it.

What was your first impression of the camps?
Everything I saw there was in accordance with the Geneva Conventions and human-rights standards. The detainees have TV, a library. I was convinced the way they were being held is totally fine. But the fact that we were censored in such a heavy and irrational way causes the opposite impression. You're left with nothing because they've censored everything.

So you couldn't just snap photos of anything you wanted, right?
They were very strict, with no margin to the left or to the right. In [the U.S. military's] Censorship [Department], they went through every picture and video, frame by frame. For example, we would go into the camp to shoot the watchtowers. But they told us we couldn't shoot more than one in the same frame, for security reasons. There had to be a guard in the watchtower we were shooting, but the guard couldn't be seen in the shot. We also couldn't shoot the security camera on the tower, which to me looked like the generic cameras you'd find in any drugstore. We couldn't shoot the faces of the detainees. No pictures of locks, faces or the seashore.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: mouselion @ 06/09/2008 7:01:30 AM

    Who sets the fine for running over the iguanas, the military?

  • Posted By: joe_mama @ 06/08/2008 2:36:37 PM

    no disrespect ahmed, but the change in governments won't change anything.

    For the record, I am far more concerned about mistaken identities and misinformation (I know it's hard to believe, but a terrorist may actually lie about his/her associations to throw investigators off) than I am about their "rights" as detainees. I do not support torture (there's no proof that it works) but I do not feel as though these individuals should be given the same rights as prisoners of war.

    In other words, I'm stuck about what to do with these individuals....and I'm actually a moderate! There are far stronger feelings in both liberal and conservative circles, and any mention of rights is answered with "9/11", "Khalid Shiek Mohammed" and "soft on terror". No American politician of any standing will talk about these individuals, so they are likely to continue to suffer indefinately.

    And, no, I'm not proud of it.

  • Posted By: Mimebinha @ 06/06/2008 7:10:26 AM

    It is interesting how we forget that the detainees at Guantanamo are just that - detainees; not criminals.
    They were detained for taking up arms against the US or coalition allies and by Common Article III of the Geneva Conventions are unpriviliged beligerents and by Geneva (international law) the US has the right to detain them until the end of hostilities. It is not about guilt or innocence; it is the capability and intent to do harm to the US that keeps the detainees at Guantanamo Bay.

    Several hundred of detainees have been returned to their home countries, and by Department of Defense reporting some have returned to terrorism. Including a Kuwaiti who was a suicide bomber in Iraq last month. (www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/05/07/gitmo.bomber)

    Unfortunately, the cited independent and reliable sources provide their opinion, and those are taken at face value instead of being analyzed or filtered through critical thought and factual research.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg