CAMPAIGN 2008

Fixing the Vote

How to keep new voters from falling off the rolls

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The primaries have been thrilling, marked by surging voter participation. States without Electoral College clout that have traditionally been ignored by candidates—from Indiana and Texas to North Carolina and even South Dakota—have hosted vibrant campaigns. But as the excitement and suspense of the primary season fades and the reality of a general election sets in, how can we make sure this moment of rare public engagement is not just an aberration?

Major change comes when a widely felt public need collides with dysfunctional public institutions. Today, government is broken. The answer must be more than a simple changing of the guard; we know there will be a new president, after all. But there must also be changes in the way our democracy functions. If we want to end the special-interest stasis that paralyzes Congress, for example, we should move to public financing of congressional campaigns. If we worry that Congress is endlessly partisan, we should reform redistricting rules so that lawmakers can't simply carve themselves one-party districts. If we liked the 50-state frenzy that made every vote matter, we should end the Electoral College (which, intriguingly, could be bypassed by states even without a constitutional amendment).

But no improvement would have a more hopeful impact than to craft a modern and inclusive voting system. Turnout in the Democratic primary, at least, has been double that of the last election cycle, and it will likely rise higher in November. But this rising tide may swamp the ramshackle system by which we cast and count votes. With luck, this year won't be a mess. But we can tap this energy to fix voting, for good. Starting next year, the country should move to a system of universal voter registration, in which every eligible citizen can vote. We should end voter registration as we know it.

The United States is one of the few industrialized democracies that erects barriers to registration, making individuals sign themselves up and bear the burden of keeping their registration up to date. The system leaves gaps and inaccuracies in voter rolls, causes voters to fall through the cracks when they move, and creates opportunities for partisan mischief. Former presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter chaired a commission that concluded, "The registration laws in force throughout the United States are among the world's most demanding … [and are] one reason why voter turnout in the United States is near the bottom of the developed world." Today, some 50 million eligible American citizens are not on the rolls.

Yes, voting is a responsibility. But the government should not put up obstacles to registration, either through bureaucratic mistakes or misguided laws. We don't privatize most other key roles in our functioning democracy. We don't tell people to organize themselves to show up for the census, or to collect taxes. We don't ask litigants to rustle up a jury pool. We see all these as government's natural, obvious obligation. We should also see government as having the prime role in creating an accurate list of who can vote. This primary season showed a yearning to participate. Government shouldn't stand in the way.

There are many creative ways to achieve universal voter registration. States could piece together a list from existing tallies, such as drivers' licenses and jury rolls. Or states could do what Massachusetts has done for two centuries, which is conduct an annual census to find out who lives there. A new, universal voting list could be updated yearly with mass mailings, tax returns, auto registrations, and forms from the post office that people could fill out when they change their addresses. The federal government could set a national standard, then give states funds to help them make sure the voters are on the rolls.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/20/2008 12:54:11 PM

    TYLER - The price of oil swelled to another record high Monday morning - before dropping back. It almost hit $140 a barrel - but then fell 25 cents. It appears - a recent increase in oil output from Saudi Arabia -- is not driving down crude prices. Former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, who started a bipartisan group called "American Solutions for Winning the Future" held little back at the Texas Republican Convention. He wants to use American solutions to change to the U.S. energy policy.

    Simply put - he's fed up with Congress: "The problem is not big oil or the foreigners," said Speaker Gingrich. "The problem is not the Saudis. The problem is getting Congress to do it's job." And that job, he says, is to start using the energy we have. "Congress outlaws every conceivable energy source," said Speaker Gingrich. Gingrich is making his case for domestic drilling by launching a campaign with Actor Chuck Norris, with the slogan: "Drill here, Drill now, Pay less." The campaign is urging Congress to do something now to bring down gas prices. Speaker Gingrich also has thoughts on speculators. "It's people who are betting the U.S. is too dumb to produce (its own oil)."


    He sides with East Texas Congressman Louie Gohmert -- when it comes to speculators and drilling. "If you began selling off two million barrels a day...we can pump out of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. It would immediately bring down the price of oil." Speaker Gingrich proposes selling off half of the reserve - now. "Do it suddenly..without telling anybody in advance and punish every speculator."The very speculators, he says, that are betting against America."

    GO TO WWW.AMERICANSOLUTIONS.COM AND SIGN THE PETITION !!!

  • Posted By: Skallywag @ 06/19/2008 8:13:10 AM

    How about we do this to get our elected officials, it eliminates the ???"ties to favored interests" aspect, and the career politician aspect. You put the names of everyone who has served the good of the public such as military, police, firefighters, hospital workers, state, county, city employees, etc, in a hat. Every six years you pull two names out of the hat and there are your senators. They go to Washington, represent their districts and come home and go back to work. Do the same thing at the appropriate times for your house of representatives. You put the names of the ones who served as senators and representatives in a hat and every four years you pull out two names - President and Vice president. Can you imagine the secret service pulling up to your neighbor???s house one morning (think of the one you feel is a little out there)? They knock on the door and out comes the guy dressed in a bathrobe, his wife???s pink slippers and holding a cup of coffee in a "you might be a redneck???" mug, needing a comb and a shave and scratching himself in unusual places - all the while the press has him on national TV and the secret service guy is saying "Good morning Mr. President???" while Matt Lauer is trying to shove a microphone in his face to ask him how does it feel to be president. Who knows, it just might work???.

    Or better yet, eliminate the Electoral College, let every eligible person vote for the individual person they feel is qualified for these jobs and let the democracy work the way it is supposed to work. I don???t like either of the two presidential candidates; it???s like being forced to decide if you want syphilis or gonorrhea. Our freedom of choice is gone ??? under the current system, we can't vote for the individual we feel is most qualified and best able to act as President of the USA. We are forced to choose from two very poorly qualified people. By the way, the best choice dropped out long before the democratic primary was bought.

  • Posted By: 9-volt @ 06/18/2008 7:45:29 PM

    PLEASE, you can not blame the congress that is (barely) held by the dems for the country's economics woes, for exactly the same reason you can't blame bush. The economy is a complex machine - china and saudi arabia probably have more say in our economy than congress. Bush can veto any bill the dems propose, so it currently takes a bi-partisan 2/3 vote to get anything passed. Got realism?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse