BETWEEN THE LINES
Jonathan Alter
The Great Mentioner at Work
Strickland, Warner, Webb, Schweitzer, Kaine, Clark, Dodd, Nunn, Sebelius. Who does Barack want?
Franklin D. Roosevelt's first vice president, John Nance Garner, was quoted as saying the vice presidency isn't worth a pitcher of warm spit. But he didn't put it quite that way. "Cactus Jack" actually used the word "piss," and when a reporter changed it to "spit" for the family newspaper he worked for, Garner called him a "pantywaist." Nowadays, the problem with the quote is that it's not true. Nearly half of the presidents since World War II have been veeps first, and the job has become much more powerful. That makes choosing a running mate a more complex challenge than it once was, as Barack Obama is about to find out. He should think of the office not as a bodily fluid but as a curriculum with three subjects: Geography, Chemistry and International Relations. Anyone who can meet at least some of these requirements merits inclusion on the list fancifully floated by what Russell Baker calls "The Great Mentioner."
Geographical balance hasn't proved decisive since LBJ helped JFK carry Texas in 1960. But Obama may feel he needs to secure Ohio to reduce his risk. That makes Gov. Ted Strickland, a former pastor and strong Hillary backer (both big pluses), a possibility, though he'd need more scrutiny. Gov. Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania has said he's not interested, but Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico is. Richardson would help with Hispanic voters, where Obama has trouble, but he didn't make the cut in 2000 and 2004, which doesn't bode well for him.
The other geography play is Virginia, which Obama believes he can turn blue. Popular former governor Mark Warner is a successful entrepreneur, which is an asset. But Warner has yet to explain fully why he dropped out of the 2008 presidential race when he was doing well. And he would have to abandon his current campaign for the Senate, where a President Obama would need every Democrat possible to move his agenda.
Sen. Jim Webb would also have to leave his Virginia seat. Webb is a twofer: Geography and national security. Although he only won his 2006 Senate campaign narrowly (and was stiff and stubborn on the stump), Webb, a Vietnam veteran and former Navy secretary under Ronald Reagan, could help inoculate Obama on defense. Every time John McCain tried to make Democrats look soft on terror, Webb could wave his son's Iraq combat boots. His Scots-Irish brawler heritage would score with Appalachian voters who distrust Obama. On the negative side, Webb, a prolific author, wrote a 1979 magazine article entitled "Women Can't Fight" that would harm him with women still sore over Hillary Clinton's treatment.
There's a third veep-ready Virginian: Gov. Tim Kaine. He's a twofer, too (Geography and Chemistry). After Kaine and Obama learned that their grandparents all lived in the same tiny Kansas town, they became friends. Kaine, a Catholic who got elected by a healthy margin in a conservative state despite opposing the death penalty, lacks any foreign-policy experience. But some Obamanians believe that adding a candidate with national-security credentials would look defensive and accentuate McCain's advantage in experience. If that argument carries, it would open the door to other candidates like Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer (who would have big appeal among independents) and Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, an Obama friend (more Chemistry) and the daughter of former Ohio governor John Gilligan (more Geography). Sebelius is experienced and compelling on the stump. But bypassing Hillary to pick another woman might be seen as insulting, at least at first, by voters who think Hillary earned it.
If Obama prefers a sober white guy who is credible on International Relations, he'll consider retired Gen. Wesley Clark, a staunch Clinton supporter who has never held office but ran respectably in 2004. So, of course, did Sen. John Kerry, an early Obama backer and national-security expert whose unprecedented selection would make Obama look exceptionally secure. Kerry is still popular in the states he carried, but Democrats are notoriously hostile to losers. His 2004 running mate, John Edwards, says he doesn't want a sequel, but he could help Obama with working-class whites. If Chemistry is key, Obama could pick Tom Daschle, though Daschle couldn't even carry South Dakota for him last week.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: lunamoon @ 06/20/2008 9:20:04 PM
Comment: Dear Jonathan Alter,
Again tonight you said on MSNBC's Countdown that "...one thing that can stop Obama from getting to the White House is a terrorist attack."
Why do you, as an analyst, insist on surmising that a terrorist attack would hurt Obama's campaign and help McCain's?
Wouldn't a terrorist attack unfortunately and vividly demonstrate that the Bush/McCain war on terror did NOT work, is NOT working, and will never work?!
I am mystified, and frankly disturbed, at your continued wrong-headed reasoning on this particular hypothetical.
If, God-forbid, there would be a terrorist attack before the fall general elections, I and all rational Americans would blame the Bush/McCain Iraq policy!
Joanne Gordon
Princeton, NJ
Posted By: cadbury @ 06/20/2008 4:18:38 PM
Comment: Whoops! Make that VoteBoth.com (not .org)
Posted By: cadbury @ 06/20/2008 4:02:58 PM
Comment: Rationale for Obama/Cinton in 2008--from Ed Kilgore on VoteBoth.org:
While there are plenty of qualified Democrats -- and even Republicans -- available to Obama, none is without handicaps, risks or shortcomings. Edwards and Strickland have taken themselves out of the running. Many feminists consider Jim Webb unacceptable, and many gays and lesbians feel the same way about Sam Nunn. Mark Warner's running for the Senate. Daschle's been a lobbyist. Biden's been a Washington fixture for 36 years, and supported the war resolution. Like Sebelius, Daschle, Nunn, Evan Bayh and Brian Schweitzer are from states no Democrat is likely to carry. Bayh or Dodd would immediately lose Democrats a Senate seat. Sherrod Brown's not a very unifying figure. And Al Gore excepted, none of those mentioned have been endorsed by 17 million-some-odd primary voters.
I could go on, but you get the idea: There ain't no easy running mate. Those who are so quick to dismiss the unity ticket have an obligation to come up not just with a better idea, but a better idea that can command broad support in the party. It's obviously Barack Obama's choice, and his choice alone, but he should remember that this is one year when a united Democratic Party will have an overwhelming advantage in the general election. That's a change we can believe in.